Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
Check the appropriate box:
[   ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ]Confidential, forFor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ] Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Under Rule 14a-12

Aflac Incorporated

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

AFLAC INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
[X] No fee required.
[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials:
[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Formform or Scheduleschedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
previously paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:
4) Date Filed:



Table of Contents

Notice of
2017 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and
Proxy Statement

Monday, May 1, 2017 10:00 am | Columbus Museum (the Patrick Theatre)
1251 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia

Table of Contents

Our Strategy


Table of Contents

Our Long-Term Growth Strategy

 

March 17, 2017

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

First, let me thank you for putting your faith, confidence and resources in Aflac Incorporated. It is my pleasure to invite you to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Monday, May 1, 2017, where you can hear about Aflac Incorporated’s recent business performance and strategy for the future.

In addition, I encourage you to review the enclosed proxy materials and Aflac Incorporated’s 2016 Year in Review and Annual Report on Form 10-K to learn more about your company and our latest achievements. Then please vote your shares, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. We want to be sure your shares are represented.

Looking back on the Company’s sixty-two years in business, our founding principles are as relevant today as they were in 1955. At that time, John Amos, the Company’s principal founder, was joined by his brothers, Paul and Bill, as they set out to establish a company focused on insurance products that would help ease the financial burden of getting sick or injured. Their vision and dedication laid the groundwork for an incredibly rewarding six decades of growing the business and touching millions of lives. In 2016, we made significant strides in advancing our vision ofoffering high-quality voluntary products, solutions and service through diverse distribution outlets, building upon our market-leading position to drive long-term, sustainable shareholder value.

Our Company has always managed our business for the long term while remaining laser-focused on meeting our more immediate financial objectives. Our activities are centered on protecting policyholders, growing our business and driving shareholder value. By delivering on our promise to be there when our policyholders need us most and running our business The Aflac Way, we’ve gained the trust of more than 50 million people worldwide who count on us to pay claims fairly and promptly.

As we look ahead, delivering on our promise will remain our priority because that is not only what sets our Company apart, it’s who we are. Thank you again for your faith, confidence and investment in Aflac Incorporated.

Sincerely,

 

Daniel P. Amos

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

 

March 17, 2017

To my Fellow Shareholders:

It is an honor for me to serve as Lead Non-Management Director on your behalf, and I am fortunate to work with a diverse group of knowledgeable and experienced Board members who are committed to overseeing corporate governance and business strategy effectively and prudently. On behalf of my fellow directors, I want to share some of our key areas of focus over the past year.

Shareholder Engagement

I have worked with the Company’s Investor and Rating Agency Relations team to ensure we understand the opinions and positions of our shareholders. Our outreach has included Financial Analyst Briefings, attended by many of our shareholders, in both New York and Tokyo as well as other meetings with institutional investors. As a result of these efforts, the Board has received invaluable feedback, related to our board practices, executive compensation structure and sustainability efforts, resulting in positive dialogue and actions on behalf of you, our shareholders.

Board Composition and Succession Planning

The Board engages in a regular self-evaluation process to ensure we maintain the right balance of perspective, experience, skill sets and subject matter experts required for prudent oversight of the Company. We believe it is appropriate to maintain a balance of longer-tenured members who bring valuable, Company-specific knowledge that lends a historical perspective with newer members who bring fresh viewpoints and new ideas. Accordingly, over the last five years, we have added six new directors—most recently, Karole Lloyd, who brings a wealth of financial, accounting and auditing experience and a new, external perspective to our Board.

Corporate Activities

A major part of the Board’s responsibility is working to ensure that the Company is well-positioned in both the short and long term. In 2016 the Board oversaw a variety of corporate activities. Among other things, Aflac initiated the process of converting Aflac’s Japan branch to a subsidiary, which will better align the Company with more common global regulatory practices and corporate structures.

Executive Compensation Program

In response to feedback from investors, our long-term incentive compensation program no longer relies on annual measurements of average risk-based capital (RBC) over a three-year period, and instead incorporates a single three-year measure of RBC in 2016, together with additional new performance criteria in 2017. We believe this revision to executive compensation appropriately motivates executives to focus on the long-term growth of the Company while appropriately minimizing risk to policyholders and the Company.

With these bigger-picture topics in mind, I encourage you to review the accompanying proxy and associated materials and to vote your shares before our annual meeting on May 1, 2017. The Board looks forward to receiving and acting upon feedback from our investors, and we thank you for your support.

 

Sincerely,

 

Douglas W. Johnson

Lead Non-Management Director

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Contents

Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholdersi
Proxy Summary1
Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy5
Election of Directors (Proposal 1)8
Ownership Reporting17
Corporate Governance18
Shareholder Outreach18
Director Independence18
Board Leadership Structure18
Lead Non-Management Director18
Board Self-Evaluation19
Director Nominating Process19
Enterprise-Wide Risk Oversight20
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management Succession Planning21
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics21
Communications with Directors22
Board and Committees22
Director Compensation27
Compensation Discussion & Analysis29
Executive Summary29
Elements of our Executive Compensation Program33
CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance38
Program Changes for 201742
Retirement, Deferral, and Savings Plans43
Additional Executive Compensation Practices and Procedures44
2016 Summary Compensation Tables47
Pension Benefits52
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation54
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control55
Equity Compensation Plan Information59
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal 2)60
Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Say-On-Pay Votes (Proposal 3)61
Audit and Risk Committee Report62
Related Persons Transactions63
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 4)64
Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017) (Proposal 5)65
Proposal to Approve an Amended and Restated 2018 Management Incentive Plan (Proposal 6)72
Other Matters75
Appendix A – Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017)77
Appendix B – Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan93
Appendix C – Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures and Reconciliations to Corresponding GAAP Measures99

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Notice of 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

TheYou are cordially invited to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Aflac Incorporated (the “Company”) will be held on Monday, May 1, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. at the Columbus Museum (in the Patrick Theatre), 1251 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia, for the following purposes, all of which are described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

Logistics

1.Date and Time
toMay 4, 2020
10:00 am

Place(1)
Columbus Museum (in the Patrick Theatre)
1251 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia

Record Date
February 25, 2020

Proposal


To elect fourteenas Directors of the Company the eleven nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;qualified


2.toTo consider a non-binding advisory proposal on the Company’s executive compensation (“say-on-pay”);


3.to hold a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes;

4.toTo ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;2020

Board’s Recommendation

FOReach of the
eleven director nominees

  FOR     FOR     

5.Further Information

PAGEto approve the adoption of the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017) (“2017 LTIP”) with additional shares authorized under the 2017 LTIP;2

6.PAGEto approve the adoption of the 2018 Management Incentive Plan (“2018 MIP”); and27

7.PAGEto transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.58

In addition, any other business properly presented may be acted upon at the meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

How to Vote

It is important that you vote your shares. We encourage you to take advantage of theoffer several easy and cost-effective Internet and telephone voting that the Company offers.methods for your convenience.

   Internet     
Internet:TelephoneMail:MailTelephone:In Person:Person

Visit the website listed on your proxy card. www.proxyvote.com.You will need the control number that appears on your proxy card when you access the web page.card.

Complete and sign the proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope.

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, or other nominee: Follownominee, follow the telephone voting instructions, if any, provided on your proxy card. If your shares are registered in your name: Callname, call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the telephone voting instructions. You will need the control number that appears on your proxy.proxy card.

If you received a full package by mail, complete and sign the proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope.

You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote orally or by ballot.

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company.Directors. The Proxy Statement and the Company’s 20162019 Year in Review and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, are enclosed.(2)The record date for determining which shareholders are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is February 22, 2017.25, 2020. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.

Your vote is important! Even if you expect to attend the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, please vote in advance so that we may be assured of a quorum to transact business. You may vote online or by telephone, or, if you received a paper copy of this proxy statement, by signing, dating and returning your proxy card.advance. If you attend the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person.

By order of the Board of Directors,

 

J. Matthew Loudermilk

Secretary


March 17, 2017

19, 2020
Columbus, Georgia

(1)

We continue to monitor developments regarding the coronavirus (COVID-19). In the interest of the health and well-being of our shareholders, we are planning for the possibility that the Annual Meeting may be held solely by means of remote communication. If we make this change, we will announce the decision to do so in advance and provide details on how to participate at investors.aflac.com.

(2)

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 4, 2020: This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available at proxyvote.com.

* Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 1, 2017. This2020 Proxy Statement     and the Annual Report are available at proxyvote.com.iii


 i

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents


LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

MARCH 19, 2020
Dear Fellow Shareholder:

It is my pleasure to invite you to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Monday, May 4, 2020, where you can learn more about Aflac Incorporated’s recent business performance and strategy for the future. I encourage you to review the enclosed proxy materials and Aflac Incorporated’s 2019 Year in Review and Annual Report on Form 10-K to learn more about your company and our latest accomplishments. Then, please vote your shares, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. We want to be sure your shares and your viewpoints are represented.

Aflac Incorporated continues to manage the business for the long term while keeping our more immediate financial objectives top of mind. We focus on providing protection to our policyholders, growing our business, being a good corporate citizen, and driving shareholder value. In doing so, we’ve gained the trust of more than 50 million people worldwide. We don’t seek out recognition for recognition’s sake, but when we receive it, we know we’re on the right track. In 2019, we appeared on Fortune’s List of World’s Most Admired Companies for the 19th time, and Aflac Incorporated ranks No.2 in its industry for “Long-Term Investment Value.” Following are some other highlights that stand out from 2019:

GROWTH
Aflac Incorporated generated $3.3 billion in net earnings or $4.43 per diluted share, up 13.2% and 17.5% from last year, respectively, and an increase in adjusted earnings per diluted share on a currency-neutral basis of 6.3% to $4.42, driven by strength in core margins. Our results are especially meaningful given the low-interest-rate environment in Japan and our extensive investments in the business to drive future earned premium growth, which will remain a critical strategic focus for 2020.

CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT
When it comes to capital deployment, significant value is achieved through a balance of growth investments, stable dividend growth and disciplined, tactical stock repurchase. In December 2016, we announced our intent to unlock around $1.7 billion in excess capital drawing down Aflac’s U.S. risk-based capital (RBC) ratio closer to 500% by the end of 2019, as part of our conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary. I am happy to report that by the end of 2019 we succeeded in unlocking $1.75 billion in excess capital and brought Aflac’s RBC ratio to 539%. However, we believe our capital position by any measure remains robust given our risk profile, and we continue to have among the highest return on capital and lowest cost of capital in the industry. Investing in our profitable business model remains the first priority for our capital, and this includes buy to build acquisitions like our November 2019 acquisition of Argus Holdings, LLC and its subsidiary Argus Dental & Vision, Inc., a benefits management organization and national network dental and vision company. This acquisition marks our strategic entry into network dental and vision in the U.S., which we will build out over the course of 2020 and roll out nationally in 2021.

We also remain committed to returning capital to our shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchase. Accordingly, our Board of Directors increased the cash dividend 3.8% in 2019, marking the 37thconsecutive year of dividend increases. It goes without saying that we are very proud of, and want to extend, this track record. In addition, we repurchased approximately $1.6 billion, or 32 million of our shares. We will continue to seek the right balance of investing in our business, continuing our long record of dividend growth, and repurchasing stock. Through a combination of dividends and share repurchase, we returned more than $2.4 billion to our shareholders in 2019.

We focus on providing protection to our policyholders, growing our business, being a good corporate citizen, and driving shareholder value... [and] we’ve gained the trust of more than 50 million people worldwide.

iv       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

I’m in my 30th year as CEO of Aflac Incorporated, and since the end of August 1990 to the end of 2019, our stock has generated a total return to shareholders, including reinvested cash dividends, of more than 8,913%. This performance significantly exceeds the S&P Life & Health, S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the same period.

CORPORATE CULTURE OF DOING THE RIGHT THING – THE AFLAC WAY
We believe that fostering and welcoming all forms of diversity in our daily operations, throughout our workforce, management team and in the composition of our Board, enhances our ability to respond to all of our constituents. Living up to the commitments we make to our customers, to our fellow employees and to all the people who rely on us is just the way we work. It’s the Aflac Way. One of the seven commitments of the Aflac Way is “Treat Everyone with Respect and Care.” One way of reinforcing this culture of understanding is by cultivating and fostering a diverse working environment and including people who represent different viewpoints. I’m proud of the fact that in the United States, 35% of our key senior leadership team are ethnic minorities or women, and 66% of our U.S. employees are women. I’m also proud of the fact that Aflac Japan achieved its goal of 30% female leadership at the company in 2019, one year ahead of schedule. By delivering on our promise to be there when policyholders need us most, paying claims fairly and promptly, and managing our business The Aflac Way, we’ve gained the trust of more than 50 million people worldwide.

CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP
At Aflac Incorporated, we have worked to be a good corporate citizen for decades because it’s the right thing to do, and we have captured this in our Corporate Responsibility Report for more than 10 years. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that we have achieved success while focusing on doing the right things for our policyholders, shareholders, employees, sales distribution, business partners and communities. I’m proud of what we have accomplished in terms of both our social purpose and financial results, which have ultimately translated into strong, long-term shareholder return.

In 2019, we followed up the initial U.S. introduction ofMy Special Aflac Duck, a smart, comforting companion that helps children feel less alone by using interactive technology during their cancer treatment, by introducing it in Japan. This special fuzzy companion helps bring comfort to children during their cancer care journey through “feeling cards” that help them express a range of emotions and a compatible web-based app that enables the children to mirror their care routines.

We will continue to drive shareholder value and do so by acting ethically and giving back to the communities in which we operate. Ultimately, we believe this is a more sustainable approach to business that will continue to increase shareholder value. By remaining disciplined and focusing on doing what we do best, I believe we will continue to generate results that build long-term shareholder value.

I also would like to express my gratitude to you, our shareholders, for putting your faith, confidence, and resources in Aflac Incorporated. As we look ahead, delivering on more than a promise will remain our priority, because that is not only what sets us apart, it’s who we are.

Sincerely,

Daniel P. Amos
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


“Treat everyone with respect and care.”

2020 Proxy Statement         v


Table of Contents

LETTER FROM THE LEAD
NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR

MARCH 19, 2020
To My Fellow Shareholders:

I am honored to have the opportunity to serve as Lead Non-Management Director, working with an experienced team of Board members who exemplify acumen in a broad range of disciplines. This team is dedicated to effectively and pragmatically overseeing Aflac Incorporated’s corporate governance and business strategy. I want to share some of the key areas on which my fellow directors and I have focused.

Shareholder Engagement:As lead director, I will continue to engage our investors, gain insight into their perspectives and consider the viewpoints and positions of those who invest in our business. As a result, the Board has received valued feedback related to our Board practices and composition, executive compensation structure, and sustainability efforts, to name a few areas. This results in productive discussions and actions representing you, our shareholders.

Board Composition:Just as we foster diversity within our Company operations, we foster diversity within our Board to ensure that we maintain a 360 degree view of our operations and to prompt productive and informative discussions covering the breadth and depth that our business requires. It is vital that we maintain an accomplished and cohesive Board composed of subject matter experts who are passionate about their respective areas of discipline. Our Board is made up of members whose skill sets align with the current and future needs of our Company. The Board engages in a regular self-evaluation process to ensure we maintain a cohesive, diverse, and well-constituted board of high integrity that exemplifies the right balance of perspective, experience, independence, skill sets, and subject matter experts required for prudent oversight of the Company. Over the last five years, six new directors have been added. Georgette Kiser is the most recent example of an outstanding addition to the Board, and we believe that she will prove to be a tremendous addition to the Audit and Risk Committee, too. In 2020, as a result of the Board’s annual self-evaluation process and feedback from shareholder engagements, we have determined that the Board would benefit from additional representation from Japan. We believe we found an excellent candidate in Nobuchika Mori.

Commitment to Sustainability:We began establishing and defining Aflac Incorporated’s corporate purpose many years ago, even before investors began showing an interest. Establishing and defining the Company’s corporate purpose has been integral to our success. Each year, we highlight some of our efforts in Aflac Incorporated’s Year in Review and Corporate Social Responsibility reports, which I invite you to read. The Board has long recognized the importance of corporate social responsibility and sustainability in creating long-term value for shareholders. We have had a dedicated Board-level sustainability committee since 2007 and in 2017, we broadened the focus of that committee and renamed it the Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee. In addition, we have witnessed increased interest in Environmental, Social and Governance, or ESG, from investors and others alike over the last two years. As a result, the Company has expanded and enhanced its disclosures with the launch of Aflac Incorporated’s ESG Hub, esg.aflac.com, which includes reporting using Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) standards. The Company’s hard work to address ESG

As lead director, I will continue to engage our investors, gain insight into their perspectives and consider the viewpoints and positions of those who invest in our business.

vi       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

issues has been widely acknowledged. For example, in 2020, the Company was recognized by Ethisphere as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies for the 14th consecutive year, remaining the only insurance company in the world to receive this honor every year since this award was inaugurated in 2007. Earlier this year, Bloomberg added Aflac Incorporated to its Gender-Equality Index, which tracks the financial performance of public companies committed to supporting gender equality through policy development, representation and transparency. I think that you will agree that the Company has a good story to tell, and we are excited to share it.

Risk Oversight:It is vitally important that our Board continually works to identify risks that are relevant to both the industry and to the Company. Along with carefully monitoring traditional risks associated with investments and our product risk profile, as well as maintaining strong capital ratios and managing operational risk, the Board has overseen significant advancements in information security and has enhanced our information security policy with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s information assets and data, and the data of its customers, are appropriately protected. The addition of Ms. Kiser’s expertise to our Board has added depth to our IT and information security oversight that protects all aspects of our operations.

With these vital topics in mind, I encourage you to review the accompanying Proxy Statement and associated materials and to vote your shares before our annual meeting on May 4, 2020.

The Board looks forward to continuing our ongoing dialogue with investors and acting upon that feedback, and we thank you for your support and the privilege of representing you and your shares. It is my pleasure, and my privilege, to serve on Aflac Incorporated’s Board, and I look forward, as a fellow shareholder, to all of the ways the Company will continue to uphold its promises.

Sincerely,

W. Paul Bowers
LEAD NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR

We began establishing and defining Aflac Incorporated’s corporate purpose many years ago, even before investors began showing an interest. Establishing and defining Aflac Incorporated’s corporate purpose has been integral to our success.

2020 Proxy Statement       vii


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary



This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summaryStatement, but it does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you shouldconsider. For more information, please refer to the following:

AGENDA AND VOTING MATTERS

To elect as Directors of the Company the eleven nominees named in this Proxy Statement

FOReach nominee

PAGE2

To consider a non-binding advisory proposal on the Company’s executive compensation (“say-on-pay”)

FOR

PAGE27

To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm

FOR

PAGE58

Please read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are being delivered to shareholders on or about March 19, 2020.






For more complete information regarding the Company’s 20162019 performance, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In this Proxy Statement, the terms “Company,” “we,” or “our” refer to Aflac Incorporated, and theIncorporated. The term “Aflac” refers to the Company’s subsidiary, American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, which operates inColumbus. The term “Aflac U.S.” refers collectively to the Company’s United States (“insurance subsidiaries: Aflac; American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York), a wholly owned subsidiary of Aflac; and Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac U.S.”) and as a branch inGroup Insurance. The term “Aflac Japan” refers to Aflac Life Insurance Japan (“Ltd.

viiiAflac Japan”).Incorporated


ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS

DateMonday, May 1, 2017
Time10:00 am
PlaceColumbus Museum
(the Patrick Theatre),
1251 Wynnton Road,
Columbus, Georgia
Record DateFebruary 22, 2017

AGENDA AND VOTING MATTERS

Board
ProposalrecommendationPage
1. to elect fourteen Directors of the CompanyFor each nominee8
2. to consider a non-binding advisory proposal on the Company’s executive compensation (“say-on-pay”)For60
3. to hold a non-binding vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votesFor every year61
4. to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmFor64
5. to approve the adoption of the 2017 LTIPFor65
6. to approve the adoption of the 2018 MIPFor72

Information about our Board Members

BOARD TENURE
2017 Non-management Directors (11)

DIVERSITY OF SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

1

Table of Contents

Proxy Summary



01
Proposal 1
Election of Directors
Each Director stands for election annually. The following provides summary information about the nominees. Our Board believes it is appropriate to maintain a diverse balance of longer tenured members, who bring stability and valuable Company-specific knowledge with a historical perspective, and newer members, who bring fresh viewpoints and new ideas.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the eleven nominees.PAGE 2

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Committee Memberships
  NameINDAgeDirector
Since
ARCCDCGEFICSR
DANIEL P. AMOS
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Aflac Incorporated
681983
W. PAUL BOWERS
Lead Director
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Georgia Power Co.
632013
TOSHIHIKO FUKUZAWA
President and CEO,
Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd.
632016
THOMAS J. KENNY
Former Partner and Co-Head of
Global Fixed Income, Goldman Sachs
Asset Management
562015
GEORGETTE D. KISER
Operating Executive,
The Carlyle Group
522019
KAROLE F. LLOYD
Certified Public Accountant and retired
Ernst & Young LLP audit partner
612017
NOBUCHIKA MORI
Representative Director, Japan Financial
and Economic Research Co. Ltd.
63*
JOSEPH L. MOSKOWITZ
Retired Executive Vice President,
Primerica, Inc.
662015
BARBARA K. RIMER, DrPH
Dean and Alumni Distinguished
Professor, Gillings School of Global
Public Health, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill
711995
KATHERINE T. ROHRER
Vice Provost Emeritus,
Princeton University
662017
MELVIN T. STITH
Dean Emeritus of the Martin J. Whitman
School of Management at
Syracuse University
732012

ARAudit & RiskEExecutiveIndependent
CCompensationFIFinance & InvestmentChair
CDCorporate DevelopmentCSRCorporate Social Responsibility & SustainabilityMember
CGCorporate Governance
*First year nominated

Each Director stands for election annually. The following table provides summary information about the nominees. Our Board believes it is appropriate to maintain a diverse balance of longer tenured members, who bring stability and valuable Company-specific knowledge with a historical perspective, and newer members, who bring fresh perspectives and new ideas.

    Committee Memberships
NameAgeDirector
Since
Ind.Audit & RiskCompensationCorporate
Development
Corporate
Governance
ExecutiveFinance &
Investment
Sustainability

Daniel P. Amos

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Aflac Incorporated and Aflac

651983     CHAIR  

Paul S. Amos II

President of Aflac

412007      

W. Paul Bowers

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power Co.

602013 CHAIR   

Kriss Cloninger III

President of Aflac Incorporated

692001       

Toshihiko Fukuzawa

President and CEO, Yushu Tatemono Co., Ltd.

602016       

Elizabeth J. Hudson

Retired Chief Communications Officer for the National Geographic Society

671990    CHAIR

Douglas W. Johnson*

Certified Public Accountant and retired Ernst & Young LLP audit partner

732004CHAIR    

Robert B. Johnson

Retired Senior Advisor, Porter Novelli PR

722002 CHAIR   

Thomas J. Kenny

Former Partner and Co-Head of Global Fixed Income, Goldman Sachs Asset Management

532015       

Charles B. Knapp

President Emeritus of the University of Georgia

701990   CHAIR 

Karole F. Lloyd

Certified Public Accountant and retired Ernst & Young LLP audit partner

582017      

Joseph L. Moskowitz

Retired Executive Vice President, Primerica, Inc.

632015    

Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH

Dean and Alumni Distinguished Professor, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

681995   CHAIR 

Melvin T. Stith

Dean Emeritus of the Martin J. Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University

70

2012     

*Douglas W. Johnson is also the Lead Non-Management Director.

2Information About Our Board Members
BOARD TENURE

2020 Independent Director nominees (10)

7 of our 10 Independent Director nominees are minority and/or women

 

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENTDIVERSITY OF SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

2020 all Director nominees (11)

INDEPENDENT
CURRENT OR FORMER CEO
MARKETING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
JAPANESE MARKET EXPERTISE
INVEST. AND FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
OPERATIONS EXPERIENCE
REG. AND RISK MGMT. EXPERIENCE
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC HEALTH EXPERIENCE
DIGITAL/CYBER SECURITY
WOMAN DIRECTOR
MINORITY DIRECTOR

2020 Proxy Statement       ix


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

2016 Business HighlightsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Annual director elections
Majority vote standard for director elections
Independent Lead Director
Active and responsive shareholder engagement process
Annual Board evaluations, including individual director interviews
Shareholder ability to call special meetings
Shareholder right of proxy access
Robust CEO succession planning process
Director mandatory retirement age

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS

We carefully consider the impact our actions will have on our communities and our planet – not only today, but in the years to come.We are invested in an inclusive and equitable work environment.

We are proud of the accolades we have received, a handful of which are listed below, and we invite you to read Aflac’s Year in Review and Corporate Social Responsibility reports to learn more about our initiatives.

Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work for in America (20thconsecutive year)
Fortune’s Most Admired Companies (19thtime)
Ethisphere’s World’s Most Ethical Companies (14thconsecutive year)
Named to Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (8thconsecutive year)
Bloomberg’s Gender-Equality Index, which tracks the financial performance of public companies committed to supporting gender equality through policy development, representation and transparency.

x         Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

In 2016,Proxy Summary



02
Proposal 2
Executive Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)
We are committed to achieving a high level of total return for our shareholders. From the end of August 1990, when Daniel P. Amos was appointed the CEO, through December 31, 2019, the Company’s total return to shareholders, including reinvested cash dividends, has exceeded8,913%, compared with 2,111% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 1,748% for the S&P 500 Index, and 1,000% for the S&P 500 Life & Health Insurance Index over the same period.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR our executive compensation.PAGE 27

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Our executive compensation philosophy is to provide pay that is aligned with the Company’s results. We believe this is the most effective method for creating shareholder value and it has played a significant role in making the Company delivered strong operating results.an industry leader. Our pay-for-performance compensation program generally targets market median positioning and delivers the majority of direct compensation through performance-based elements. This ensures proper alignment with our shareholders and ties compensation for named executive officers to the Company’s performance.

The Company’s executive compensation program reflects our corporate governance best practices principles:

The Board’s independent Compensation Committee oversees the program.
The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant that reports only to that Committee.
The independent compensation consultant briefs the full Board annually on CEO pay and performance alignment.
We were the first public company in the U.S. to voluntarily provide shareholders with a say-on-pay vote–three years before such votes became mandatory.
Executive officers and Directors may not enter into 10b5-1 plans unless approved by the Compensation Committee or pledge the Company’s stock.
All employees are prohibited from hedging Company stock.
Executive officers and Directors have been subject to stock ownership guidelines for almost two decades.
We have had a clawback policy since 2007.
We do not provide for change-in-control excise tax gross-ups.
All employment agreements contain double trigger change-in-control requirements.
2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
In 2019, the Company delivered strong operating results.
NET EARNINGS
$3.3B(13.2%)    Operating
EPS
17.5%
ADJUSTED EPS*
6.3%
RETURN ON EQUITY
12.6%
ADJUSTED RETURN ON EQUITY
(“AROE”)*

15.1%
REPURCHASED SHARES
$1.6B
CASH DIVIDEND
3.8%
3 YEAR TSR
+62.5%


U.S. and Japan sales(1)were down 1.3% and 16.9%, respectively.
Total revenues increased 2.5% to $22.3 billion. Total adjusted revenues increased 1.2% to $22.3 billion reflective of continued growth of the inforce business in both United States and Japan. Total adjusted revenues on a currency-neutral basis* increased .4% to $22.1 billion.
We acquired Argus Holdings, LLC which was a key step in the Company’s buy-to-build strategy to deliver best-in-class network dental and vision products to employers and unique solutions to distribution partners. Along with entering a growth market, we believe this portfolio expansion will increase producer productivity and assist with recruiting and retaining agents and expand broker markets.

*Adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding foreign currency effect1, increased 4.7% over 2015, meeting our objective for the 27th consecutive year.We believe operating earnings per diluted share,excluding foreign currency effect, continues to be one of the best measures of our performance and a key driver of shareholder value.

    Combined, we generated $2.5 billion inimpact, total new annualized premium sales in the United States and Japan, driven by a 4.1% increase in third sector sales (which includes cancer and medical insurance)in Japan.

    Revenues rose 8.1% to $22.6 billion. Total operating revenues on a currency-neutral basis1 rose 1.0% to $21.0 billion, reflecting growth in our premium income from our growing business.

    As of December 31, 2016, our capital ratios remained strong. Risk-based capital ratio was 894%. Solvency margin ratio, the principal capital adequacymeasure in Japan, was 945%.

    We have started work on converting our Japanese operations from a branch to a subsidiary form. Converting to this structure will allow the Company to further align with emerging global best practices in the financial services sector and preserve existing state regulatory oversight in the United States while also ensuring that our financial profile is as strong asit is today.

1Operating earnings per diluted share excluding foreign currency effect, operatingadjusted revenues on a currency-neutral basis, and operating return on shareholders’ equity excluding foreign currency effectAROE, are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). See the Appendix C to this Proxy Statement for a descriptiondefinitions of these non-GAAP measures and reconciliation to the nearestmost comparable GAAP measure, as applicable.financial measure.
(1)As defined in Item 1. Business in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2020 Proxy Statement       xi


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

3

Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

Executive Compensation Highlights2019 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our compensation philosophy, which extends to every employee level at the Company, is to provide pay that is directly linked to the Company’s results. We believe this is the most effective method for creating shareholder value and that it has played a significant role in making the Company an industry leader.

The Company’s executivetotal target direct compensation programs reflectmix for 2019 for (1) our corporate governance best practices principles:CEO and (2) our CEO together with our other NEOs is illustrated in the following charts, and reflects the performance-based nature of our compensation program:

    The Board’s independent Compensation Committeeoversees the program.

    The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant that reports only to that committee.

    For the past nineteen years, all of the CEO’s total direct compensation has been determined based on the Company’s financial performance and total shareholder return performance compared to our peers. The Compensation Committee regularly evaluates this formula to ensure it remains appropriate.

    The independent compensation consultant reports annually to the full Board of Directors on CEO pay and performance alignment.TARGET COMPENSATION MIX

     

CEO + NEOs TARGET COMPENSATION MIX    We were the first public company in the U.S.to voluntarily provide shareholders with asay-on-pay vote–three years before such votes became mandatory.

    Executive officers and Directors may not enter into 10b5-1 plans (unless approved by the Compensation Committee) or hedge or pledge the Company’s stock.

    Executive officers and Directors have been subject to stock ownership guidelines for almost two decades.

    We have had a clawback policy since 2007.

    We do not pay change-in-control excise tax gross-ups.

    All employment agreements contain double triggerchange-in-control requirements.

Executive Compensation Program ChangesRECENT SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

From our first voluntary “say-on-pay” advisory vote in 2008 until 2013,We are pleased that, for the Company received endorsement rates frompast two consecutive years, 96% of our shareholders that averaged more than 96%.

In recent yearsvoting on the support for our executive compensation program has been less favorable; approximately 86% of our shareholderssay-on-pay proposal voted in favor of our 2016 say-on-pay proposal. In addition, consistent withexecutive compensation. We believe this continued support reflects favorably on changes we have made to our executive compensation program over the past practice, the Company engaged in shareholder outreach efforts throughout 2016. The Compensation Committee incorporated thefew years to more tightly link compensation metrics to our business strategy while incorporating feedback received from these conversations into its regular review of compensation practices, and also conducted a thorough analysis of best practices. As a result, the Compensation Committee has modified our compensation plans, as further discussed in this proxy statement.

Based on the feedback resulting from the Company’s shareholder engagement and analysis, in 2016 the LTI award for the CEO continued under the current structure and process: the contingent PBRS grant made in February 2016 was trued up as of December 31, 2016, based on the Company’s relative financial and relative TSR performance versus our peers. Beginning in 2017, the Company will grant the CEO’s entire annual LTI award at a competitive level considering peer market data, the Company’s performance, and the tenure and performance of the CEO.

The Compensation Committee also has approved changes to the management incentive program and the LTI award program for executives other than the CEO. The management incentive program will reflect fewer metrics, taking into account a new definition of operating earnings. Additionally, the Aflac Japan direct premium metric will focus on third sector business in Japan. The 2017 LTI program will follow a simplified approach recommended by our independent compensation consultant that is consistent with long-term incentive plans offered by our peers. See “Program Changes for 2017,” which begins on page 42.

shareholders. We work hard to ensure we remain current, continue to leadimplement best practices in executive compensation best practices, and remainwhile staying focused on performance-based program elements that align with shareholder concerns. Accordingly, weinterests. We will continue to review our reviewcompensation program each year to determine if additional changes should be made in 2017.are warranted.

Pay-for-Performance

Our compensation program targets market median positioning and delivers the majority of that compensation through performance-based compensation elements. This ensures proper alignment with our shareholders and ties the ultimate value delivered to named executive officers (“NEOs”) to the Company’s performance.

4Learn more in theCompensation Discussion & Analysisunder the heading “Outcome of 2019 Say-on-Pay Vote”.


03
Proposal 3
Ratification of Auditors
In February 2020, the Audit and Risk Committee voted to appoint KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to perform the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2020, subject to ratification by the shareholders.
The Board of Directors and the Audit and Risk Committee recommend a vote FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP.PAGE 58

xii     Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
iii     

How to Vote

AFLAC INCORPORATEDLetter from the Chairman and CEO
Letter from the Lead Non-Management Director
Proxy Summary
ixInformation about our Board Members
xCorporate Governance Highlights
xCorporate Social Responsibility/Sustainability Highlights
xiExecutive Compensation Highlights
xi2019 Business Highlights
xii2019 Executive Compensation
xiiRecent Say-On-Pay Votes
Corporate Governance Matters
2PROPOSAL 1
2017 PROXY STATEMENTElection of Directors

3Board Composition
3Director Skills Summary and The Link to Our Strategy
3Director Nominees
9Director Nominating Process
11Board Self-Evaluation
11Director Independence
12Our Board and Committees
12Board Leadership Structure
13Lead Non-Management Director
13Committee Structure
21Meeting Attendance
21Board Responsibilities
21Enterprise-Wide Risk Oversight
22Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
22Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management Succession Planning
23Commitment to Social Responsibility and Sustainability
23Shareholder Outreach
24Governance Documents
24Director Compensation
24Cash Compensation
25Equity Compensation
25Vesting
25Retirement Plans
262019 Director Compensation
Executive Compensation
27PROPOSAL 2
Executive Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)
27Compensation Discussion & Analysis
28Executive Summary
32Compensation Design and Philosophy
362019 Executive Compensation
44Additional Executive Compensation Plan Practice and Procedures
45Compensation Committee Report
46Executive Compensation Tables
462019 Summary Compensation Table
472019 All Other Compensation
472019 Perquisites
482019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
492019 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
502019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
50Pension Benefits
52Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
53Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
56CEO Pay Ratio
57Equity Compensation Plan Information
Audit Matters
58PROPOSAL 3
Ratification of Auditors
58Audit Fees and Other Fees
58Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
59Audit and Risk Committee Report
60Related Person Transactions
Stock Ownership
62Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s Securities
63Security Ownership of Directors
64Security Ownership of Management
64Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy
Other Matters
Appendix – Definition of Non-U.S. GAAP Measures and Reconciliations to Corresponding U.S. GAAP Measures

2020 Proxy Statement         1


Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of ProxyCorporate Governance Matters

This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Monday, May 1, 2017, and any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and described in detail herein. The Annual Meeting will be held at 10 a.m. at the Columbus Museum (in the Patrick Theatre), 1251 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia.

The mailing address of our principal executive offices is Aflac Incorporated, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999.

All properly executed proxies returned to the Company will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained thereon. If you return your proxy with no voting instructions indicated, the proxy will be voted FOR the election of all Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, FOR approval of Proposals 2 and 4 through 6, for holding advisory votes on executive compensation every “year” (Proposal 3), and according to the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. If you are a shareholder of record, you also may submit your proxy online or by telephone in accordance with the procedures set forth in the enclosed proxy, or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders can revoke a proxy at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice to that effect to the Secretary of the Company or by submitting a later-dated proxy or subsequent internet or telephonic proxy. Shareholders who attend the Annual Meeting may revoke any proxy previously granted and vote in person orally or by written ballot.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are being delivered to shareholders on or about March 17, 2017.

Solicitation of Proxies

The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. The Company will make arrangements with brokerage firms, custodians, and other fiduciaries to send proxy materials to their customers, and will reimburse these entities for the associated mailing and related expenses. In addition, certain officers and other employees of the Company may solicit proxies by telephone and by personal contacts, but those individuals will not receive additional compensation for those efforts. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $9,500, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

Proxy Materials and Annual Report

As permitted by the SEC rules, we are making these proxy materials available to our shareholders via the internet. Accordingly, we have mailed to most of our shareholders a notice about the internet availability of this Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2016 Year in Review and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (together, the “Annual Report”) instead of paper copies of those documents. The notice contains instructions on how to access those documents online, how to vote at proxyvote.com, and how to request and receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report. If you select the online access option for the Proxy Statement, Annual Report, and other account mailings throughaflinc®, the Company’s secure online account management system, you will receive electronic notice of availability of these proxy materials. If you do not receive a notice and did not already elect online access, you will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. We believe providing online access to our critical documents will conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

 
5
01
Proposal1
Election of Directors

Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy

Multiple Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

The Company is sending only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement or notice of availability of these materials to shareholders who consented and who share a single address. This is known as “householding.” However, any registered shareholder who wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement may contact Shareholder Services by phone at (800) 227-4756, by email at shareholder@aflac.com, or by mail at the address set forth above. If you receive multiple copies of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement or notice of availability of these materials, you may request householding by contacting Shareholder Services (if you are a registered shareholder) or by contacting the holder of record (if you own the Company’s shares through a bank, broker, or other holder of record).

Description of Voting Rights

The Company believes that long-term shareholders should have a greater say in our success. Accordingly, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that each share of the Company’s Common Stock is entitled to one vote until it has been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of longer than 48 months prior to the record date of the meeting, at which time each share becomes entitled to ten votes. If a share is transferred by gift, devise, or bequest, or otherwise through the laws of inheritance, descent, or distribution from the estate of the transferor, or by distribution to a beneficiary of shares held in trust, the transferee is deemed to be the same beneficial owner as the transferor for purposes of determining the number of votes per share. Shares acquired as a direct result of a stock split, stock dividend, or other distribution with respect to existing shares are deemed to have been acquired and held continuously from the date on which the underlying shares were acquired. Shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a stock option are deemed to have been acquired on the date the option was granted.

Shares of Common Stock held in “street” or “nominee” name are presumed to have been held for less than 48 months and are entitled to one vote per share unless this presumption is rebutted by evidence to the contrary. If you wish to demonstrate that you have held your Common Shares in street name for longer than 48 months, please complete and execute the affidavit appearing on the reverse side of your proxy. The Board of Directors may require evidence to support the affidavit.

Quorum and Vote Requirements

Holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on February 22, 2017, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At that date, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote was 401,177,209. According to the Company’s records, this represents the following voting rights:

Number of shares Votes per share Yields this many votes 
371,012,282@1=371,012,282 
30,164,927@10=301,649,270 
401,177,209 Total 672,661,552 

If all of the outstanding shares were entitled to ten votes per share, the total number of possible votes would be 4,011,772,090. However, for purposes of this Proxy Statement, we assume that the total number of votes that may be cast at the Annual Meeting will be 672,661,552.

The holders of a majority of the voting rights entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of such business that comes before the meeting. Abstentions are counted as “shares present” for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes are counted as “shares present” at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

6Each Director stands for election annually. The following provides summary information about the nominees. Our Board believes it is appropriate to maintain a diverse balance of longer tenured members, who bring stability and valuable Company-specific knowledge with a historical perspective, and newer members, who bring fresh viewpoints and new ideas.
     

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy

The following table shows the voting requirements for each proposal we expect at the Annual Meeting.

ProposalVote required to PassEffectThe Board of abstentions and broker non-votes
Uncontested election of directorsVotes cast forDirectors recommends a nominee exceed votes cast against that nomineeAbstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and have no effect
voteAdvisory vote on frequency of future say-on-pay votesFORThe frequency (every year, every two years, or every three years) that attains the most votes will prevailAbstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and have no effect
Ratification each of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmeleven nominees.Majority of the votes castAbstentions are not counted as votes cast and have no effect. Brokers and other nominees may vote without instructions, so we do not expect broker non-votes.
Advisory say-on-pay, 2017 LTIP, and 2018 MIPMajority of the votes castAbstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and have no effect

If a nominee who is already serving as a Director is not re-elected at the Annual Meeting in an uncontested election, Georgia law provides that Director would continue to serve on our Board as a “holdover director.” However, our Director Resignation Policy provides that holdover directors must tender a resignation to our Chairman of the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee will consider such resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject it. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider all factors its members deem relevant, including the stated reasons why shareholders voted against such Director, the qualifications of the Director, and whether the resignation would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board will formally act on the Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than ninety days following the date of the Annual Meeting at which the election occurred. The Company will, within four business days after such decision is made, publicly disclose that decision in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC, together with a full explanation of the process by which the decision was made and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. If a nominee who was not already serving as a Director is not elected at the Annual Meeting, that nominee would not become a Director or a holdover director.

In a contested election at an annual meeting of shareholders (meaning the number of nominees exceeds the number of Directors to be elected), the standard for election of Directors would be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of Directors.

Effect of Not Casting a Vote

If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you provide voting instructions to the record owner. Otherwise, your shares will not count in any proposal other than Proposal 4—Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Your bank or broker is not permitted to vote without your instructions in the election of Directors, on the advisory vote on executive compensation, on the advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes, or on the two proposals to approve our compensation plans. Broker non-votes on these matters will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals. Your bank or broker may vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4).

If you are a shareholder of record and you do not return your proxy card, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any item of business at the Annual Meeting. If you return the proxy card but do not give voting instructions, your proxy will be voted FOR the election of all Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, FOR approval of Proposals 2 and 4 through 6, for “every year” frequency for say-on-pay votes (Proposal 3), and according to the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

7

Table of Contents

Proposal 1:Election of Directors

The Company proposes that the following fourteeneleven individuals be elected to the Board of Directors.Board. These individuals have been nominated by the Board’s Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors and, ifCommittee. If elected, they are willing to serve until the nextfor a one-year term expiring at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders andShareholders. Each Director will hold office until their successors havehis or her successor has been elected and qualified.qualified or until the Director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. The people named in the accompanying proxy (or their substitutes) will vote to elect these nominees unless specifically instructed to the contrary. However, if any nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, the people named in the proxy (or their substitutes) will have discretionary authority to vote or to refrain from voting on any substitute nominee. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve. Our Board believes it is appropriate to maintain a diverse balance of longer tenured members, who bring stability and valuable Company-specific knowledge with an historical perspective, and newer members, who bring fresh perspectives and new ideas.

All but one of the nominees introduced below are currently members of our Board. Ms. Lloyd was appointed as a director, uponUpon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, Mr. Nobuchika Mori has been nominated to serve on January 6, 2017. Ms. Lloydthe Board. Mr. Mori was recommended for the Board by the Chairman of the AuditBoard most notably for his regulatory expertise and Risk Committee.financial acumen gathered over a three-plus decade career in Japan and internationally as a financial regulator, including from July 2015-July 2018, as Commissioner of Japan’s Financial Services Agency.

DIRECTOR SKILLS SUMMARYWe expect all of our Directors to have a demonstrated ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of the Company. As shown below, our nominees have a range of skills and experience in areas that are critical to our industry and our operations.

Japanese
Current orOperationsMarketFinancialRisk Mgmt.IndustryPublic Health
Nameformer CEOExperienceIndependentExperienceExpertiseExperienceExperienceExperience
Daniel P. Amos·····
Paul S. Amos II····
W. Paul Bowers······
Kriss Cloninger III····
Toshihiko Fukuzawa······
Elizabeth J. Hudson··
Douglas W. Johnson···
Robert B. Johnson···
Thomas J. Kenny···
Charles B. Knapp···
Karole F. Lloyd··
Joseph L. Moskowitz·····
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH···
Melvin T. Stith···

2         Aflac Incorporated


FOR
The Board of Directors recommends a vote“for”the election of each of the following nominees as directors.

8

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Proposal 1: Election of DirectorsBOARD COMPOSITION

Director Skills Summary and The Link to Our Strategy

Skills and Experience
Independent
Marketing and Public Relations
Current or former CEO
Operations Experience
Japanese Market Experience
Investment and Financial Expertise
Regulatory and Risk Mgmt. Experience
Industry Experience
Public Health Experience
Digital/Cyber Security Experience

Director Nominees

    

AGE

65

DIRECTOR SINCE

1983

COMMITTEES

Executive(Chair)

Daniel P. Amos
CHAIRMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF AFLAC INCORPORATED

ChairmanAGE
68

DIRECTOR SINCE
1983

COMMITTEES
Executive (Chair)
Finance and Chief Executive Officer of Aflac Incorporated and Aflac

Investment

Mr. Amos has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Aflac since 1990, and Chairman since 2001.2001, was President of Aflac from July 2017 to May 2018, and was President of Aflac Incorporated from February 2018 through December 2019. He has spent 3840 years in various positions at Aflac.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS    

Institutional Investormagazine has named Mr. Amos one of America’s Best CEOs in the life insurance category five times. Additionally,Harvard Business Review has named Mr. Amos was named among the World’s Best Performing CEOs by Harvard Business Review in 2015 and 2016.each of the past four years.CR Magazinerecently honored him with a Lifetime Achievement Award for his dedication to corporate responsibility.

Mr. Amos’ experience and approach deliver insightful expertise and guidance to the Board of Directors on topics relating to corporate governance, people management, and risk management.

·OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Synovus Financial Corp.(2001-2011)
(2001 to 2011)

·Southern Company(2000-2006)
(2000 to 2006)

    

AGE

41

DIRECTOR SINCE

2007

COMMITTEES

Executive

Finance and Investment

Paul S. Amos IIPresident of Aflac

Mr. Amos has been President of Aflac since January 2007. He was Chief Operating Officer of Aflac U.S. from February 2006 until July 2013, and executive vice president, U.S. Operations, from January 2005 until January 2007. Since January 2008, Mr. Amos has also played a leadership role in Aflac Japan sales and marketing efforts. After assuming reporting responsibilities for Aflac Japan in 2013, Mr. Amos relocated to Tokyo for two years to oversee the Aflac Japan operation locally.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION
Mr. Amos brings to the Board a deep knowledge of insurance sales, which forms the core of our business, as well as more than ten years of experience at the Company in various leadership roles. Furthermore, his extensive familiarity with the Japanese culture and insurance industry brings a unique perspective to the Board. 

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

                                   
9

2020 Proxy Statement         3


Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Corporate Governance Matters

     

AGE

60

DIRECTOR SINCE

2013

COMMITTEES

Corporate

Development(Chair)

Audit and Risk* Sustainability

*Financial Expert

W. Paul Bowers
CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF GEORGIA POWER CO.

Chairman, PresidentINDEPENDENT

LEAD NON-MANAGEMENT INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

AGE
63

DIRECTOR SINCE
2013

COMMITTEES
Corporate Development (Chair)
Audit and Chief Risk*
Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability
Executive Officer of Georgia Power Co.
*

Financial Expert

Mr. Bowers has been chairman, president and chief executive officer of Georgia Power, the largest subsidiary of Southern Company, a gas and electricity utility holding company, since 2011. Before that, Mr. Bowers served as chief financial officer of Southern Company from 2008 to 2010. Previously, he served in various senior executive positions across Southern Company in Southern Company Generation, Southern Power, and the company’s former U.K. subsidiary, where he was president and chief executive officer of South Western Electricity LLC/Western Power Distribution.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Mr. Bowers brings to the Board a valuable and unique perspective from his considerable financial knowledge as a former chief financial officer;knowledge; national and international business experience, including experience in Japan and operating in a highly regulated industry; and expertise in corporate development and managing the evolving risks associated with cyber security.

·OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Chair, Atlanta Committee for Progress(2016)
(since 2016)

·Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd.
(since 2009); current Chairman

·Board of Regents of the University
System of Georgia (since 2014)(2014-2018)

·Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s
Energy Policy Council (since 2008)(2008-2018)

    

AGE

69

DIRECTOR SINCE

2001

COMMITTEES

Executive

Kriss Cloninger IIIPresident of Aflac Incorporated

Mr. Cloninger has been President of the Company since 2001, and before that was executive vice president since 1993. He served as Chief Financial Officer from 1992 to 2015, and Treasurer from 1993 to 2015. Prior to joining the Company in 1992, he was a principal in KPMG’s insurance actuarial practice and served as a consultant to Aflac beginning in 1977. Mr. Cloninger will retire as President on December 31, 2017.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITIONOTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Mr. Cloninger has been named Best CFO in America in the insurance/life category by Institutional Investor magazine three times. His financial acumen and expertise in the Company’s operations and corporate strategy bring a unique economic perspective to our Board of Directors.Brand Industrial Holding, Inc, (since 2019) and Audit Committee Chair (since 2019)

 

TotalSystem Services, Inc. (TSYS)
(since 2004)

TupperwareBrands Corporation
(since 2003)

Fellowof the Society of Actuaries


10

Toshihiko Fukuzawa
PRESIDENT AND CEO OF CHUO REAL ESTATE CO., LTD

 

AFLAC INCORPORATEDINDEPENDENT

AGE
2017 PROXY STATEMENT63

DIRECTOR SINCE
2016

COMMITTEES
Finance and Investment

Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

   

AGE

60

DIRECTOR SINCE

2016

Toshihiko FukuzawaPresident and CEO of Yushu Tatemono Co., Ltd

Mr. Fukuzawa has been the president and chief executive officer of Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd., a real estate development and leasing company in Japan, since July 2018. Previously, he was the president and chief executive officer of Yushu Tatemono Co., Ltd. since, also a real estate development and leasing company in Japan, from June 2015 where he also serves as a representative director.to June 2018. He served as deputy president and a representative director at Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. from April 2013 to March 2015, managing executive officer and head of the IT System Group at Mizuho Bank Ltd. from June 2011 to March 2013, and deputy president and a representative director at Mizuho Information & Research Institute Inc. from June 2009 to June 2011. BetweenFrom 2002 andto 2009, he held executive officer and general manager positions at Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and affiliated companies, part of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. which was formed in a merger between his former employer, Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd., and two other banks. Mr.Inc.Mr. Fukuzawa held various positions of increasing responsibility at Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd., from 1979 until 2002.which he joined in 1979.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

Over a 36-year career as a professional banker in Japan, Mr. Fukuzawa has gained extensive business and IT knowledge and experience with a wide range of Japanese financial services institutions, including insurance companies. He provides the Board with valuable insight and expertise relevant to the Company’s Japanese business.

 

                                    

4         Aflac Incorporated

   

AGE

67

DIRECTOR SINCE

1990

COMMITTEES

Sustainability (Chair)

Corporate
Development

Finance and
Investment

Elizabeth J. HudsonRetired Chief Communications Officer for the National Geographic Society

Ms. Hudson was the chief communications officer of the National Geographic Society from 2014 to 2015, and previously served as the senior communications executive since 2000. She oversaw philanthropic development and was responsible for all communications and public affairs initiatives undertaken by the National Geographic Society and its subsidiaries, including media and public relations, community engagement and social media, brand stewardship, employee communications, and related marketing-communications activities.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITIONOTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Ms. Hudson has more than forty years of experience serving on the executive management teams of several national and international organizations, including publicly traded entities and one of the world’s largest scientific and research organizations. She brings extensive experience in strategic corporate communications, including financial and crisis communications management, and in marketing initiatives. She also has expertise in developing and articulating sustainability programs.Co-chair, Washington chapter of Women Corporate Directors (since 2010)


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

11

Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Corporate Governance Matters

    

AGE

73

DIRECTORSINCE

2004

LEAD NON- MANAGEMENT

DIRECTOR

COMMITTEES

Audit and Risk*(Chair)

Compensation

Executive

*Financial Expert

Douglas W. JohnsonCertified Public Accountant and retired Ernst & Young LLP
   audit partner

Mr. Johnson is a certified public accountant who retired as an Ernst & Young LLP audit partner in 2003. He spent the majority of his career focusing on companies in the life, health and property/casualty segments of the insurance industry. During Mr. Johnson’s thirty-year tenure with Ernst & Young and its predecessor firms, he was coordinating partner of several large multinational insurance companies and for the firm’s largest American insurance client.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITIONOTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Mr. Johnson’s work experience includes extensive coordination with the audit committees of publicly held insurance companies. His finance experience and leadership skills enable him to make valuable contributions to our Audit and Risk Committee, where he serves as the Chair.Member, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

    

AGE

72

DIRECTOR SINCE

2002

COMMITTEES

Compensation

(Chair)

Corporate Governance Executive

Robert B. JohnsonRetired Senior Advisor, Porter Novelli PR

Mr. Johnson retired from Porter Novelli PR, where he was a senior advisor from 2003 until 2014. Until 2008, he served as chairman and CEO of the One America Foundation, an organization that promotes dialogue and solidarity among Americans of all races and provides education, grants and technical equipment to disadvantaged youth. Before that, he served in President Clinton’s administration as an assistant to the President and director of the President’s initiative for One America. He served two years in the Carter Administration, and then was the Business Regulations Administrator for Washington, D.C.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITIONOTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Mr. Johnson has extensive experience in political and media strategic planning and community involvement. He also brings to the Board substantial experience in executing public relations strategies and promoting diversity.Deputy chair, Democratic National Committee (2003 to 2004)

12

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

    

AGE

53

DIRECTOR SINCE

2015

COMMITTEES

Finance and
Investment

Thomas J. Kenny
Former PartnerFORMER PARTNER AND CO-HEAD OF GLOBAL FIXED INCOME, GOLDMAN SACHS ASSET MANAGEMENT

INDEPENDENT

AGE
56

DIRECTOR SINCE
2015

COMMITTEES
Finance and Co-Head of Global Fixed Income, Goldman Sachs Asset ManagementInvestment (Chair)

Corporate Development
Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability

Mr. Kenny has served as a trustee of TIAA-CREF, trusteea financial services organization, since 2011. He also currently serves as the chairChair of the TIAA-CREF Funds Board of Trustees, previously served as Chair of the Investment Committee, and also currently sits on the TIAA-CREF Funds Operations Committee.Audit, Investment and Nominating and Governance Committees. Prior to his role at TIAA-CREF, Mr. Kenny held a variety of leadership positions at Goldman Sachs for twelve years, most recently serving as partner and advisory director. He also served as co-head of the Global Cash and Fixed Income Portfolio team at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, where he was responsible for overseeing the management of more than $600 billion in assets across multiple strategies with teams in London, Tokyo, and New York. Before joining Goldman Sachs, Mr. Kenny spent thirteen years at Franklin Templeton. He is a CFA charter holder.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

Mr. Kenny’s extensive experience in investment management and financial markets provideprovides the Board with valuable insight and expertise.

    

AGE

70

DIRECTOR SINCE

1990

COMMITTEES

Finance and
Investment
(Chair)

Audit and Risk*

Corporate
Development

*Financial Expert

Charles B. KnappPresident Emeritus of the University of Georgia

Dr. Knapp is president emeritus of the University of Georgia. Dr. Knapp was president of the Aspen Institute from 1997 to 1999, and from 2000 to 2004 was a partner with the executive search firm Heidrick & Struggles. From 2004 to 2011 he was director of Educational Development for the CF Foundation. Dr. Knapp was also interim dean of the Terry College of Business at the University of Georgia from 2013 through 2014. Earlier in his career, Dr. Knapp served as the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Tulane University and as U.S. deputy assistant secretary of labor in the Carter Administration.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION
OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Dr. Knapp’s experience
CREF Board of Trustees, Chairman
TIAA-CREF Fund Complex
Executive Committee, Chair
Investment Committee
Audit Committee
Nominating and knowledge provide the Board with valuable insight into the areas of finance, investments, and management.Governance Committee
 Chairman, East Lake Foundation (2006 to 2011)


AFLAC INCORPORATEDGeorgette D. Kiser
2017 PROXY STATEMENTOPERATING EXECUTIVE, THE CARLYLE GROUP

    13

INDEPENDENT

AGE
52

DIRECTOR SINCE
2019

COMMITTEES
Compensation

Ms. Kiser is an Operating Executive at The Carlyle Group, a global alternative asset management firm, where she advises CARLYLE professionals through the investment process, from sourcing deals, conducting diligence, managing companies and exiting transactions. She also helps set IT strategy for Carlyle Portfolio companies and drives IT / digital diligence and advisory efforts. Ms. Kiser was a managing director and chief information officer at The Carlyle Group, where she was responsible for leading the firm’s global technology and solutions organization from February 2015 until May 2019. In this role, Ms. Kiser developed and drove information technology strategies across the global enterprise, which includes the firm’s application development, data, digital, infrastructure, cyber security, and program management and outsourcing activities. Prior to joining The Carlyle Group, Ms. Kiser held positions of increasing responsibility at T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., also a global alternative asset management firm, from 1996 to 2015, including the role of vice president, Enterprise Solutions and Capabilities within the services and technology organization.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION Throughout Ms. Kiser’s three-plus decade career, she has established extensive experience and success developing and leading talented teams to deliver decision support systems and technical solutions, including cyber security, for financial services firms. She has consistently been recognized for bringing credibility to solutions and technical organizations in addition to building strong business partnerships, leveraging human and technical resources, implementing investment and customer management systems, and producing advanced data management solutions.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Jacobs Engineering (since 2019)
Adtalem Global Education(since 2018)
YearUp.org (National Capital Region) Board of Trustees(since 2016)
The Boys’ Latin School of Maryland Board of Trustees(since 2009)
Previously served on the Boards of Trustees for the University of Baltimore Foundation, T. Rowe Price Foundation, the University of Baltimore Merrick School of Business Advisory Board, The Maryland Business Roundtable STEMnet board, and the Greater Baltimore Committee Leadership

2020 Proxy Statement         5


Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Corporate Governance Matters

     

I

AGE

58

DIRECTOR SINCE

2017

COMMITTEES

Audit and Risk*

*Financial Expert

Karole F. Lloyd
Certified Public AccountantCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AND RETIRED ERNST & YOUNG LLP AUDIT PARTNER

INDEPENDENT

AGE
61

DIRECTOR SINCE
2017

COMMITTEES
Audit and retired Ernst & Young LLP audit partnerRisk* (Chair)

Executive Finance and Investment
*Financial Expert

Ms. Lloyd is a certified public accountant and recently retired as vice chair and regional managing partner for Ernst & Young, LLP.LLP (“EY”), a global accounting firm, in December 2016. She brings to Aflac more than 37 years of work experience and leadership, most recently as part of the board of Ernst & Young,US Executive Board, Americas Operating Executive and the Global Practice Group for EY, and has extensive experience in the audits of large financial services, insurance, and health care companies. Ms. Lloyd served many of EY’s highest profile clients through mergers, IPOs, acquisitions, divestitures, and across numerous industries including banking, insurance, consumer products, transportation, real estate, manufacturing, and retail. She has served as an audit partner for publicly held companies in both the United States and Canada. Ms. Lloyd’s other experience includes leadership and consulting with respect to financial reporting, board governance and legal matters, regulatory compliance, internal audit, and risk management.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Ms. Lloyd’s extensive accounting and advisory experience across many industries,the financial service industry, combined with her leadership skills and strategic thinking, provide valuable perspective for our Audit and Risk Committee.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Churchill Downs Incorporated and Audit Committee (since 2018)
The University of Alabama President’s Advisory Council (since(since 2003)

The University of Alabama Board of Visitors for the Commerce and Business School (since(since 2001)

AtlantaSymphony Orchestra Board of Directors (since(since 2010)

MetroAtlanta Chamber of Commerce, Board of Trustees and Executive Committee (2009 to 2016)(2009-2016)

Nobuchika Mori
REPRESENTATIVE DIRECTOR, JAPAN FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH CO. LTD.

INDEPENDENT

AGE
63

DIRECTOR NOMINEE

Mr. Nobuchika Mori is representative director of the Japan Financial and Economic Research Co. Ltd., a research and consulting firm. In this role, he has been responsible for providing research and consulting services to companies in Japan and abroad since July 2018. He is currently also an adjunct professor and senior research scholar at Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (since October 2018). From July 2015 until his retirement in July 2018, Mr. Mori served as commissioner of the Financial Services Agency of Japan (the “JFSA”), Japan’s integrated financial regulator. In this role, he led supervision of financial institutions including banks, securities firms and insurance companies, and directed legislative and regulatory planning to ensure financial stability and enhance economic growth in Japan. Before becoming the head of JFSA, he spent more than 30 years in senior positions at JFSA and Japan’s Ministry of Finance (the “MOF”), including JFSA Vice Commissioner for Policy Coordination, Director General for Inspection, and Director General for Supervision (July 2014 to July 2015). He also served in a range of diplomatic posts reflecting his expertise in international financial markets and regulatory standards, including as the Chief Representative in New York for the MOF, Minister of the Embassy of Japan in the United States of America, and as Deputy Treasurer at the Inter-American Development Bank.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION Over a three-plus decade career immersed in Japan’s finance industry as a financial regulator, policymaker, and standard setter in Japan and internationally, Mr. Mori gained extensive specialized economic, policy, and financial regulatory expertise, knowledge and experience. He brings to the Board indispensable, significant insight with respect to the Company’s Japanese business operations from his considerable financial and economic knowledge, international business experience, and regulatory acumen spanning highly regulated industries in Japan and internationally.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Center on Japanese Economy and Business (CJEB) Professional Fellow(since 2018)

6         Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

    

AGE

63

DIRECTOR SINCE

2015

COMMITTEES

Audit and Risk*

Compensation

Corporate
Development

*Financial Expert

Joseph L. Moskowitz
Retired Executive Vice President, Primerica, Inc.RETIRED EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, PRIMERICA, INC.

INDEPENDENT

AGE
66

DIRECTOR SINCE
2015

COMMITTEES
Audit and Risk*
Compensation

Corporate Development

*Financial Expert

Mr. Moskowitz retired from Primerica, Inc., an insurance and investments company, where he served as executive vice president from 2009 until 2014, leading the Product Economics and Financial Analysis Group. He joined Primerica in 1988, and served in various capacities, including managing the group responsible for financial budgeting, capital management support, earnings analysis, financial supplement, and analyst and stockholder communications support. He served as chief actuary from 1999 to 2004. Before joining Primerica, Mr. Moskowitz was vice president of Sun Life Insurance Company from 1985 to 1988 and was a senior manager at KPMG from 1979 to 1985.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
With forty years of actuarial experience and leadership roles in the financial services industry, Mr. Moskowitz provides insight into the analysis and evaluation of actuarial and financial models, which form the basis of various aspects of corporate planning, financial reporting, and risk assessment, to the Board.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Fellow, Society of Actuaries

Member, American Academy of Actuaries

14 

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Proposal 1: Election of Directors


    

AGE

68

DIRECTOR SINCE

1995

COMMITTEES

Corporate Governance

(Chair)

Executive Sustainability

Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH
Dean and Alumni Distinguished Professor, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillDEAN AND ALUMNI DISTINGUISHED PROFESSOR, GILLINGS SCHOOL OF GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL

INDEPENDENT

AGE
71

DIRECTOR SINCE
1995

COMMITTEES
Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability (Chair)
Corporate Governance

Dr. Rimer has been dean of the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health since 2005, and alumni distinguished professor since 2003. Previously, she was director of the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences at the National Cancer Institute. She is a former director of Cancer Control Research and professor of community and family medicine at the Duke University School of Medicine. She was elected to the Institute of Medicine in 2008.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION At the Gillings School of Public Health, Dr. Rimer works to improve public health, promote individual well-being, and eliminate health inequities across North Carolina and around the world. In 2012, Dr. Rimer was appointed Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel and was reappointed twice since then. Her insight and leadership with respect to the public health sector are extremely relevant to the Company’s business and operations.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Chair, President’s Cancer Panel(2012-2019)
Elected to Institute of Medicine (2008)
Awarded the American Cancer Society Medal of Honor (2013)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill General Alumni Association’s Faculty Service Award (2020)

2020 Proxy Statement         7


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Katherine T. Rohrer
VICE PROVOST EMERITUS, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

INDEPENDENT

AGE
66

DIRECTOR SINCE
2017

COMMITTEES
Compensation
Corporate Governance

Dr. Rohrer is vice provost emeritus, Princeton University, having served as vice provost for Academic Programs from 2001 until 2015. Prior to assuming this role, starting in 1988, Dr. Rohrer held several senior leadership positions at Princeton University, including associate dean of the faculty and assistant dean of the college. Following her retirement, she served as interim associate dean of the graduate school in 2016-17. At theGillings SchoolColumbia University, she was an assistant professor from 1982 to 1988. Dr. Rohrer is also a trustee ofPublicHealth,Dr.Rimer workstoimprove publichealth, promoteindividual well-being, andeliminatehealth inequitiesacrossNorth Carolinaandaround the world. In 2012,Dr.Rimer wasappointedChairman of the President’sCancerPanel andhasbeen reappointed twice since then.Her insight andleadershipwithrespectto the publichealth sectorareextremelyrelevantto the Companys businessandoperations.

● Chair, President’sCancer Panel(since 2012)

    

AGE

70

DIRECTOR SINCE

2012

COMMITTEES

Audit Emory University, where she chairs the academic affairs committee and Risk*

Corporate Governance

*Financial Expertserves on the finance and executive committees.

MelvinT.StithDean Emeritusof theMartin J.Whitman School ofManagement atSyracuseUniversity

Dr.Stith is deanemeritus of theMartinJ.WhitmanSchool ofManagement atSyracuseUniversity, havingserved as deanfrom 2005 until2013.Priortoassuming this role,Dr.Stith was thedeanemeritus and theJimMoranProfessor ofBusinessAdministration atFlorida StateUniversity forthirteenyears. He has been a professor ofmarketing andbusinesssince1977following his serviceas a captain in the U.S.ArmyMilitaryIntelligence Command.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITION With more than 30 years as a university leader, Dr. Rohrer brings a wealth of experience highlighted by a commitment to academic rigor and financial management. Her operational expertise includes: executing on institutional budgetary decisions; leading academic governance and priority-setting; spearheading the recruitment of deans and other senior academic administrators; developing university-level messaging and communications; and managing endowments. Dr. Rohrer’s management career has included a focus on social responsibility, inclusion, and diversity.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Emory University Board of Trustees(since 2008; chair, Academic Affairs Committee; member, Executive Committee, Finance Committee)
Previously served on the boards of Morristown-Beard School, Morristown, NJ; Trinity Church, Princeton, NJ; Crisis Ministry of Trenton and Princeton (now “Arm in Arm”); and Dryden Ensemble.

Melvin T. Stith
DEAN EMERITUS OF THE MARTIN J. WHITMAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AT SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY

INDEPENDENT

AGE
73

DIRECTOR SINCE
2012

COMMITTEES
Corporate Governance (Chair)
Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability
Executive

Dr. Stith is dean emeritus of the Martin J. Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University, having served as dean from 2005 until 2013. Recently, Dr. Stith served as interim president of Norfolk State University from January 2018 to June 2019. Prior to assuming this role, Dr. Stith was the dean emeritus and the Jim Moran Professor of Business Administration at Florida State University for thirteen years. He has been a professor of marketing and business since 1977 following his service as a captain in the U.S. Army Military Intelligence Command.

SKILLS AND RECOGNITIONDr. Stith’s financial acumen and his leadership skills in consensus building,consensus-building, risk management, and executive management add an important dimension to the composition of our Board.

OTHER BOARD OR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS
Synovus Financial Corp. (since 1998)(1998-2019)

Flowers Foods, Inc. (since(since 2004)

Jim Moran Foundation (since(since 2000)

Dr. Stith also previouslyPreviously served on the boards of Correctional Services Corporation, JM Family Enterprises Youth Automotive Training Center, the Keebler Company, United Telephone of Florida, and Rexall Sundown.

Daniel P. Amos is the father of Paul S. Amos II. No other family relationships exist among any other executive officers or Directors.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

 15

8         Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Proposal 1: ElectionDirector Not Eligible for Re-election

Under the Company's Bylaws, Mr. Robert B. Johnson, who has turned 75 prior to our Annual Meeting, is not eligible to be nominated for re-election and, as a result, the Company has not nominated Mr. Johnson for election to the Board at the 2020 Annual Meeting. Mr. Johnson has served on our Board since 2002. We thank Mr. Johnson for his service to the Board.

Board Succession Planning and Refreshment Process

Our Board believes it is appropriate to maintain a diverse balance of Directorslonger tenured members, who bring stability and valuable Company-specific knowledge with a historical perspective, and newer members, who bring fresh viewpoints and new ideas. Our regular self-evaluation process ensures we maintain a cohesive, diverse, and well-constituted board of high integrity that exemplifies the right balance of perspectives, experience, independence, skill sets, and subject matter experts required for prudent oversight. Over the last five years, we have added six new directors as we make it a priority to identify candidates with the skills needed to ensure effective oversight.

Director Nominating Process

The following informationOur Corporate Governance Committee is provided with respect to each Directorresponsible for establishing criteria, screening candidates and nominee:

 Shares of Common Stock   
 Beneficially Owned onPercent of OutstandingVoting Rights on 
NameFebruary 22, 2017(1)SharesFebruary 22, 2017Percent of Available Votes
Daniel P. Amos4,123,2471.037,248,4955.4
Paul S. Amos II2,064,879.519,813,5432.9
W. Paul Bowers9,780*9,780*
Kriss Cloninger III715,406.25,184,183.8
Toshihiko Fukuzawa3,582,368.935,336,9695.3
Elizabeth J. Hudson84,501*765,437.1
Douglas W. Johnson71,118*380,196.1
Robert B. Johnson20,306*115,310*
Thomas J. Kenny14,212*14,212*
Charles B. Knapp94,355*803,951.1
Karole F. Lloyd6,241*6,241*
Joseph L. Moskowitz5,750*5,750*
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH43,552*295,921*
Melvin T. Stith12,752*45,211*
*Percentage not listed if less than .1%.
(1)Includes options to purchase shares, which are exercisable within 60 days for: Daniel P. Amos, 1,550,457; Paul S. Amos II, 206,975; Kriss Cloninger III, 215,419; Elizabeth J. Hudson, 25,026; Douglas W. Johnson, 55,831; Robert B. Johnson, 5,000; Thomas J. Kenny, 9,735; Charles B. Knapp, 41,919; and Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH, 31,419. Also includes shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Daniel P. Amos, 408,093, Paul S. Amos II, 61,756, and Kriss Cloninger III, 169,166, for which these individuals have the right to vote but not to transfer. These shares will vest three years from the date of grant if the Company attains certain performance goals. Also includes shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for W. Paul Bowers, 6,740, Toshihiko Fukuzawa, 1,946, Elizabeth J. Hudson, 4,125, Robert B. Johnson, 4,125, Thomas J. Kenny, 4,405, Karole F. Lloyd, 991, Joseph L. Moskowitz, 2,527, and Melvin T. Stith, 6,078, for which these individuals have the right to vote but not to transfer. These shares will vest four years from the date of grant, except restricted shares granted after 2014, which will vest one year from the date of grant.

Also includesevaluating the following shares:

Daniel P. Amos: 2,281 shares owned by his spouse; 446,325 shares owned by partnershipsqualifications of which he ispersons who may be considered for service as a partner; 991,506 shares owned by trusts of which he is trustee; 324,003 shares owned by the SOMA Foundation Inc.; 128,604 shares owned by the Daniel P. Amos Family Foundation, Inc.; 54,648 shares owned by a trust with his spouse as trustee; and 112,444 shares owned by the Paul S. Amos Family Foundation, Inc.

Paul S. Amos II: 95,028 shares owned by his spouse; 58,164 shares owned by his children; 166,736 shares owned by trusts with his spouse as trustee; 837,983 shares owned by trusts of which he or his children are beneficiaries; 15,000 shares owned by a partnership of which he is a partner; 18,471 shares owned by the Paul & Courtney Amos Foundation; 8,000 shares owned by the Dan Amos Dynasty Trust; 128,604 shares owned by the Daniel P. Amos Family Foundation, Inc.; 112,444 shares owned by the Paul S. Amos Family Foundation, Inc.; and 62,795 in the Amos Trust.

Kriss Cloninger III: 33,403 shares owned by his spouse; 58 shares owned by his spouse’s children; 35,615 shares owned by partnerships of which Mr. Cloninger is a partner; and 6,300 shares owned by trusts with Mr. Cloninger as trustee.

Elizabeth J. Hudson: 3,200 shares owned by her children; 45,192 shares owned by trusts with Ms. Hudson as trustee.

Charles B. Knapp: 21,000 shares owned by his spouse.

Toshihiko Fukuzawa: 3,580,388 shares owned by The Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. Mr. Fukuzawa shares the power to vote these shares.

Director.

 16
Succession Planning

Our Corporate Governance Committee considers the current and long-term needs of our business and seeks potential candidates in light of evolving needs, current Board structure, tenure, skills, experience and diversity.

AFLAC INCORPORATEDIdentification of Candidates

The Committee may identify potential candidates from three sources:

2017 PROXY STATEMENTsuggestions from current Directors and executive officers;
firms that specialize in identifying director candidates; and/or
as discussed below, candidates recommended by shareholders.
Threshold Qualifications

The Committee believes that, at a minimum, nominees for Director must have:

a demonstrated ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of the Company; and
an impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in both professional and personal activities.
Additional Qualifications

The Committee strives to build a diverse Board that is strong in its collective knowledge. In particular, the Committee looks for nominees with experience in the following areas:

accounting and finance
management and leadership
vision and strategy
business operations
business judgment
industry knowledge
corporate governance
global markets
communication

In addition, the Committee considers diversity in nominating Directors. Nominees must be between the ages of 21 and 74.

2020 Proxy Statement         9


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Meeting with Candidates

Once the Committee identifies one or more potential nominees, its members:

review publicly available information and contact candidates who warrant further consideration;
request further information for those potential nominees willing to be considered for a Board seat;
conduct one or more interviews with each prospective nominee; and
may contact references provided by candidates and speak with members of the business community or other people who have firsthand knowledge of a candidate’s record.

This process enables the Corporate Governance Committee to compare the accomplishments and qualifications of all potential nominees.

Decision and Nomination

The Committee nominates the candidates best qualified to serve the interests of the Company and all shareholders for nomination and approval by the Board.

Election

Shareholders consider the nominees and elect Directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to serve one-year terms. The Board may also appoint Directors during the year when determined to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Ownership ReportingConsideration of Director Candidate from Shareholders

No person, as of February 22, 2017, wasThe Corporate Governance Committee will consider Director candidates recommended by shareholders. As with any prospective nominee, the owner of record or, to the knowledgeCorporate Governance Committee will evaluate shareholder-nominated candidates in light of the Company, beneficial owner of more than 5%needs of the outstanding shares of Common Stock orBoard and the qualifications of the available votes ofparticular individuals. In addition, the Company other than as shown below.

Name and AddressTitle of ClassAmount of Beneficial Amount of BeneficialPercent ofPercent of
of Beneficial OwnerCommon StockOwnership Shares Ownership VotesClassAvailable Votes
BlackRock, Inc.*1 Vote Per Share26,189,214 26,189,2146.53.9
55 East 52nd Street      
New York, NY 10055      
State Street Corporation*1 Vote Per Share21,357,788 21,357,7885.33.2
State Street Financial Center      
One Lincoln Street      
Boston, MA 02111      
The Vanguard Group*1 Vote Per Share30,932,512 30,932,5127.74.6
100 Vanguard Boulevard      
Malvern, PA 19355      
Daniel P. Amos**10 Votes Per Share3,680,583 36,805,8311.05.4
1932 Wynnton Road1 Vote Per Share442,664 442,664  
Columbus, GA 319994,123,247 37,248,495   
*The above information is derived from Schedule 13G filings filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated January 19, 2017, by Blackrock Inc., dated February 9, 2017, by State Street Corporation and The Vanguard Group. According to the Schedule 13G filings, BlackRock, Inc., State Street Corporation, and The Vanguard Group have sole and dispositive power with respect to these shares.
**See footnote (1) on page 16.

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth, as of February 22, 2017,Corporate Governance Committee may consider the number of shares and percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by: (i) our named executive officers, comprising our CEO, CFO,held by the recommending shareholder and the three other most highly compensated executive officerslength of time such shares have been held.

To recommend a candidate for the Board, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing, including: (i) the name of the shareholder and evidence of the person’s ownership of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”), including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership; and (ii) the name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or qualifications to be a Director, and the candidate’s consent to be named as listed ina Director if nominated by the 2016 Summary Compensation Table whoseBoard.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above generally must be received by the Corporate Secretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. However, if the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 25 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder, to be timely, must be received no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was not providedmailed or public disclosure of that date was made, whichever occurs first.

Shareholder recommendations and accompanying information should be sent to the Corporate Secretary at Aflac Incorporated as described at the end of this Proxy Statement under the heading “Proposal 1: Election“Other Proposals or Director Nominations to be brought before our 2021 Annual Meeting.”

Our proxy access bylaw permits a shareholder (or group of Directors,” and (ii) all Directors and executive officers as a group.

up to twenty shareholders) owning shares of our outstanding Common Stock Beneficially Owned and Approximate Percentage of Class as of February 22, 2017

NameShares(1)Percent of SharesVotesPercent of Votes
Frederick J. Crawford62,694*62,694*
Eric M. Kirsch104,254*332,899*
All Directors, nominees, and11,969,0503.0105,929,26315.2
executive officers as a group (25 persons)    
*Percentage not listed if less than .1%.
(1)Includes options to purchase shares, which are exercisable within 60 days for Eric M. Kirsch of 17,152 and all Directors and executive officers as a group, 2,471,076. Also includes shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan; in 2015, 2016 and 2017 for Frederick J. Crawford of 61,656; in 2015, 2016 and 2017 for Eric M. Kirsch of 48,698; and all Directors and executive officers as a group 1,007,374 which they have the right to vote, but they may not transfer until the shares have vested. Includes 47,814 shares pledged for an executive officer who is not an NEO and prior to the prohibition beginning in 2013. No Director nominee or other executive officer has any pledged shares. For information on the Company’s pledging policy, please see “Stock Ownership Guidelines; Hedging and Pledging Restrictions” beginning on page 44.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16representing at least 3% of the Securities Exchange Actvotes entitled to be cast on the election of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), executive officers, Directors to nominate and holders of more than 10%include in our proxy materials Director candidates constituting up to 20% of the Common Stock are required to file reportsBoard. The nominating shareholder or group of shareholders must have owned their tradingshares continuously for at least three years, and the nominating shareholder(s) and nominee(s) must satisfy other requirements specified in Company equity securities with the SEC. Ms. Audrey B. Tillman, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, did not timely report the sale of 6,639 shares on July 27, 2012. A Form 4 for this transaction was filed on March 6, 2017, due to a delay caused by administrative error.Bylaws.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such reports received by the Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all other filings required to be made by its reporting persons complied with all applicable Section 16 filing requirements during the last fiscal year.10       Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

17

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Shareholder OutreachBoard Self-Evaluation

The effectiveness of our Board is of the utmost importance. The Board recognizes that we live in a dynamic world that requires regular self-evaluation to ensure that we have the best skill set and experience to serve the Company has a long history of engaging shareholdersand that the Board is fulfilling its responsibilities.

Annual Assessment Oversight

The Corporate Governance Committee is charged with overseeing an annual process of self-evaluation for the Board as a whole and for its individual members

Committee Self-Evaluations

The charters of the Board committee also require annual evaluations, which are typically overseen by each committee’s chair
One-on-One DiscussionsThe process, which includes completion of written questionnaires for the Board and for each committee on which the Director serves, involves an interview of each Director
Executive SessionsThe Chairman discusses the results of the surveys and interviews with the full Board in executive sessions. In addition, the Lead Non-Management Director leads executive sessions with the Board, without the Chairman, to discuss the self-evaluation results

Feedback Incorporated

Based on the self-evaluation results, any follow-ups including changes in practices or procedures are considered and implemented, as appropriate.

In addition to learn about the issuesformal self-evaluation process, the Non-employee Directors regularly meet in executive session, during which the Board’s performance and concerns thatoversight responsibilities are important to them. We believe that open communications can have a positive influence on our corporate governance practices. For example, we are proud to have been the first publicly traded company in the United States to voluntarily allow shareholders a say-on-pay vote. In keeping with this governance philosophy, we communicate with our shareholders on a regular basis and incorporate their feedback into our decision-making process.frequently discussed.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors annually assesses the independence of each Director and Director nominee. Daniel P. Amos Paul S. Amos II, and Kriss Cloninger III are all employeesis an employee of the Company. With the exception of Thomas J. Kenny, due to fees paid for his previous role as a consultant to the Board, theThe Board has determined that all of the other Director and Director nominees are “independent” under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards. None of the independent nominees has a material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The Board made its determination based on information furnished by all Directors regarding their relationships with the Company and research conducted by management.

2020 Proxy Statement       11


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

OUR BOARD AND COMMITTEES

Board Leadership Structure

Daniel P. Amos has served asIf the Chairman ofand Chief Executive Officer roles are filled by the same person, or if the Chairman is not independent, the Board since 2001 and as CEO since 1990. The Board believes the most effective Board leadership structure for the Company is for the CEO to continuethat an independent Director should be appointed to serve as Chairman of the Board, working with a Lead Non-Management Director. This structure has servedThe Lead Non-Management Director is elected annually by the Company wellBoard (effective at the first Board of Director’s meeting following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders) based upon a recommendation by the Corporate Governance Committee. Although subject to an annual election, the Lead Non-Management Director is generally expected to serve for manymore than one year, but no more than four years. The CEO is ultimately responsible for the day-to-day

Daniel P. Amos
Chairman and CEO

W. Paul Bowers
Lead Non-Management Director

Mr. Amos has served as Chairman of the Board since 2001 and as CEO since 1990. The Board believes the most effective Board leadership structure for the Company is for the CEO to continue to serve as Chairman, working with a Lead Non-Management Director. This structure has served the Company well for many years. The CEO is ultimately responsible for the day-today operation of the Company and for executing the Company’s strategy, and the performance of the Company and for executing the Company’s strategy, and the Company’s performance is an integral part of Board deliberations. Accordingly, the Board believes that Mr. Amos is the Director most qualified to act as Chairman. The Board believes that Mr. Amos’ in-depth, long-term knowledge of the Company’s operations and his vision for the Company’s development provides decisive and effective leadership for the Board. However, the Board retains the authority to modify this structure to best advance the interests of all shareholders if circumstances warrant such a change.

The Corporate Governance Committee has nominated Mr. Bowers to serve as Lead Non-Management Director, a position he has held since May 2019. Mr. Bowers’ experience at Southern Company, particularly his strong leadership and operational background, make him well-suited to serve as our Lead Non-Management Director. He has also served as Chair of the Corporate Development Committee and a member of the Audit and Risk, Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability and Executive Committees.

The Board believes its existing corporate governance practices achieve independent oversight and management accountability. These governance practices are reflected in the Company’s Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues and the Committee charters. In particular:

a substantial majority of our Board members are independent;
the Audit and Risk, Compensation, and Corporate Governance Committees all comprise independent Directors;
the Company has a Lead Non-Management Director with thesignificant responsibilities, as described below; and
the Non-employee Directors meet at each regularly scheduled Board meeting in executive session without management present.

12       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Lead Non-Management Director

Douglas W. Johnson is currently the Lead Non-Management Director. The responsibilities of the Lead Non-Management Director include:

consulting with the Chairman and Secretary to establish the agenda for each Board meeting;
setting the agenda for, and leading, all executive sessions of the Non-employee Directors;
when appropriate, discussing with the Chairman matters addressed at such executive sessions;
presiding over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present;
presiding over discussions of the Board when the topic presents a potential conflict of interest for the Chairman;
facilitating discussions between Board meetings, among the Non-employee Directors;Directors between Board meetings;
serving as a liaison between the Non-employee Directors and the Chairman of the Board;Chairman;
when appropriate, serving as a liaison between management and the Board;

  18AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Board Self-Evaluation

representing the Board in shareholder outreach; and
in coordination with the Chairman, of the Board, facilitating the annual Board self-evaluation.

The Lead Non-Management Director has the authority to call meetings of the independent Directors.

Board Self-EvaluationCommittee Structure

The effectiveness of our Board is ofhas seven standing committees: Audit and Risk; Compensation; Corporate Development; Corporate Governance; Executive; Finance and Investment; and Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability. Each committee (other than the utmost importance. The Board recognizes that we live inExecutive Committee) operates under a dynamic world that requires regular self-evaluation to ensure that we havewritten charter adopted by the best skill set and experience to serve the Company and that the Board is fulfilling its responsibilities. To that end, the Corporate Governance Committee is charged with overseeing an annual process of self-evaluationBoard. Charters for the Board as a whole and for its individual members.

The Board’s annual self-evaluation process involves both the Chairman and the Lead Non-Management Director separately scheduling one-on-one conferences with the Directors to address a variety of topics related to the Board’s performance and oversight responsibility. Among other things, the Board considers its composition, with the goal of ensuring its members have the mix of skills and subject matter expertise required for prudent oversight of the Company. In addition, the Board evaluates the Board’s processes and operations, the Board’s organization and committee structure, the Board’s oversight responsibility, the Board’s performance, and the quality of the information provided to Directors by the Audit and Risk Committee, aboutthe Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance Committee all can be found on the Company’s risk managementwebsite, aflac.com, under “Investors,” then “Governance,” and corporate compliance programs.then “Governance Documents.”

Director Nominating ProcessAll members of the Audit and Risk, Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees qualify as “outside” Directors as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, “Non-employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and independent Directors under NYSE listing standards, as appropriate.

Board Committee Refreshment

The Corporate Governance Committee believes that, at a minimum, nomineesconsiders the periodic rotation of committee members and committee chairs to introduce fresh perspectives and to broaden and diversify the views and experience represented on Board committees. As Mr. Johnson is not being nominated to stand for Director must have two qualifications:

a demonstrated ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of the Company; and
an impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in both professional and personal activities.

Beyond these threshold requirements,re-election due to the Company’s mandatory retirement policy, the Corporate Governance Committee examines each prospective candidate’s specific experienceshas nominated Mr. Moskowitz to serve as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and skills, time availability in light of other commitments, potential conflicts of interest, and independence from management andjoin the Company. The Corporate GovernanceExecutive Committee strives to build a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of backgrounds. In particular,effective May 4, 2020. Also, the Corporate Governance Committee looks for nominees with experience in the following areas:

accounting and financebusiness operationscorporate  governance
management and leadershipbusiness judgmentglobal markets
vision and strategyindustry  knowledge

Finally, the Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity (including gender, ethnicity, race, color, and national origin) in nominating Directors. Nominees must be between the ages of 21 and 74.

The Corporate Governance Committee identifies potential nominees from three sources. The Committee seeks suggestions from current Directors and executive officers; may engage firms that specialize in identifying director candidates; and, as discussed below, considers candidates recommended by shareholders.

Once the Corporate Governance Committee identifies a potential nominee, members review publicly available informationhas nominated Ms. Kiser to assess whether that person should receive further consideration. Candidates who warrant further consideration will be contacted. If a potential nominee is willing to be considered for a seatserve on the Board, the Corporate GovernanceAudit and Risk Committee will request more information.beginning May 4, 2020.

Generally, the Corporate Governance Committee conducts one or more interviews with each prospective nominee. Committee members also may contact references provided by each candidate, and speak with members of the business community or other people who may have firsthand knowledge of a candidate’s record. This process enables the Corporate Governance Committee to compare the accomplishments and qualifications of all potential nominees.2020 Proxy Statement       13

The Corporate Governance Committee will consider Director candidates recommended by shareholders. As with any prospective nominee, the Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate shareholder-nominated candidates in light of the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the particular individual. In addition, the Corporate


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

19

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Audit and Risk Committee

MEMBERS*RESPONSIBILITIES
 

Karole F. Lloyd
(Chair)

W. Paul Bowers

Joseph L. Moskowitz

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
11

*All members of the committee are Financial Experts
ensuring that management maintains the reliability and integrity of the reporting process and systems of internal controls of the Company and its subsidiaries regarding finance, accounting, and legal matters;
issuing annually the Audit and Risk Committee Report set forth below;
selecting, overseeing, evaluating, determining funding for, and, where appropriate, replacing or terminating the independent registered public accounting firm;
monitoring the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm;
pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm;
pre-approving or ratifying all related person transactions that are required to be disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
overseeing the performance of the Company’s internal auditing department;
assisting with Board oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
overseeing the Company’s policies, process, and structure related to enterprise risk engagement and management, including information security; and
providing an open avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, the internal auditing department, and the Board.

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.The independent registered public accounting firm has direct access to the Audit and Risk Committee and may discuss any matters that arise in connection with its audits, the maintenance of internal controls, and any other matters relating to the Company’s financial affairs. The Audit and Risk Committee may authorize the independent registered public accounting firm to investigate any such matters, and may present its recommendations and conclusions to the Board. At least annually, the Audit and Risk Committee reviews the services performed and the fees charged by the independent registered public accounting firm. For additional information, see “Proposal 3: Ratification of Auditors” and the “Audit and Risk Committee Report” sections beginning on page 58.

All Audit and Risk Committee members have been determined by the Board to be “audit committee financial experts,” as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of SEC Regulation S-K.

14|       Aflac Incorporated


Enterprise-Wide Risk OversightTable of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Compensation Committee

MEMBERSRESPONSIBILITIES

Robert B. Johnson
(Chairman until May 4, 2020)

Joseph L. Moskowitz

Georgette D. Kiser

Katherine T. Rohrer

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
5

reviewing and approving compensation levels, equity-linked incentive compensation, and annual incentive awards under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan;
reviewing, at least annually, the goals and objectives of the Company’s executive compensation plans;
evaluating annually the performance of the CEO with respect to such goals and objectives and determining the appropriate compensation level;
evaluating annually the performance of the Company’s other executive officers in light of such goals and objectives and setting their compensation levels based on this evaluation and the recommendation of the CEO;
reviewing the Company’s incentive compensation programs to determine whether they encourage excessive risk taking, and evaluating compensation policies and practices that could mitigate any such risk; and
reviewing the Company’s general compensation and benefit plans to ensure they promote our goals and objectives.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former employee or officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During 2019, no Director was an executive officer of another entity on whose compensation committee any executive officer of the Company served. In addition, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under the section titled “Related Person Transactions” in this Proxy Statement.

2020 Proxy Statement       15


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Corporate Development Committee

MEMBERSRESPONSIBILITIES

W. Paul Bowers
(Chairman)

Thomas J. Kenny

Joseph L. Moskowitz

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
3

reviewing the Company’s corporate and strategic organizational development to identify, evaluate, and execute on appropriate opportunities that could enhance long-term growth and build shareholder value;
assisting the Board in reviewing, evaluating, and approving specific strategic plans for corporate development activities, including mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, joint venture marketing and distribution arrangements, and strategic equity investments;
assisting the Board in reviewing proposals to enter new geographic markets;
reviewing corporate development proposals prepared by the Company’s officers and managers and other strategic projects as determined by the Board to ensure consistency with the Company’s long-term strategic objectives; and
assisting the Board in monitoring the nature of investments made as part of Aflac Ventures in both the U.S. and Japan, including the Company’s overall corporate venture capital strategy.

16       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Corporate Governance Committee may consider

MEMBERSRESPONSIBILITIES
 

Melvin T. Stith
(Chairman)

Robert B. Johnson
(until May 4, 2020)

Katherine T. Rohrer


Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
4

selecting individuals qualified to serve as Directors to be nominated to stand for election to the Board;
recommending assignments to the Board’s standing committees;
advising the Board with respect to matters of Board structure, composition, and procedures;
developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;
monitoring compliance with the Company’s political participation program;
overseeing the evaluation of the Board; and
ensuring that the Company’s management and succession plans are appropriate.

2020 Proxy Statement       17


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

MEMBERSRESPONSIBILITIES

We believe “sustainable growth” means being able to meet the needs of our shareholders and customers while taking into account the needs of future generations, and also ensuring the long-term preservation and enhancement of the Company’s financial, environmental, and social capital.

Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH
(Chair)


W. Paul Bowers


Thomas J. Kenny


Melvin T. Stith

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
3

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

overseeing the Company’s policies, procedures, and practices with respect to corporate social responsibility and sustainability, recognizing that these goals and initiatives vary widely among industries, organizations and geographies, in the context of what is appropriate and relevant to the Company, our people and the communities we serve;
monitoring the impact of the Company’s activities on customers, employees, communities, and other stakeholders in light of the Board’s fundamental duty to preserve and promote long-term value creation for the Company’s shareholders;
monitoring and reviewing the Company’s strategies, procedures, and practices related to social responsibility on a global basis, including significant philanthropic and community engagement activities;
monitoring and reviewing the development of metrics, information systems, and procedures to track progress toward achievement of the Company’s social responsibility objectives;
monitoring preparation of the Company’s annual Corporate Social Responsibility report, and reviewing such report before it is published; and
monitoring and reviewing the Company’s support of charitable, educational, and business organizations.

SUSTAINABILITY

monitoring and reviewing the Company’s policies, procedures, and practices related to corporate social responsibility and sustainability in light of the Company’s intent to foster the sustainable growth of the Company on a global basis;
monitoring and reviewing the Company’s strategies, policies, procedures, and practices related to environmental and related health and safety matters;
monitoring and reviewing the Company’s policies, procedures, and practices that enable us to proactively respond to evolving public sentiment and government regulations with regard to sustainability, especially in the areas of environmental stewardship, energy use, recycling, and carbon emissions (i.e., our carbon footprint);
reviewing the goals and objectives of the Company’s environmental stewardship policy, and amending or, to the extent an amendment requires Board approval, recommending that the Board amend, these goals and objectives if the Committee deems appropriate; and
reviewing the Company’s communication and marketing strategies related to sustainability.

18       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Executive Committee

MEMBERSPURPOSE
 

Daniel P. Amos
(Chairman)

W. Paul Bowers

Robert B. Johnson
(until May 4, 2020)

Karole F. Lloyd

Melvin T. Stith

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
4

During the intervals between meetings of the Board, the Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers of the Board that may be delegated under Georgia law.

COMPOSITION
Under the Company’s Bylaws, the Executive Committee must consist of at least five Directors, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Board, and such additional Directors as the Board may from time to time determine. Currently, the membership of the Executive Committee also includes the chairpersons of the Audit and Risk, Compensation, and Corporate Governance Committees, and includes the Company’s Lead Non-Management Director. The Chief Executive Officer (or another member of the Executive Committee chosen by him) is the Chairman of the Executive Committee.

2020 Proxy Statement       19


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Finance and Investment Committee

MEMBERSRESPONSIBILITIES
 

Thomas J. Kenny
(Chairman)

Daniel P. Amos

Toshihiko Fukuzawa

Karole F. Lloyd

NUMBER OF MEETINGS IN 2019
4

FINANCE RESPONSIBILITIES

reviewing and reassessing significant financial policies and matters of Treasury and corporate finance, including the Company’s overall capital structure, dividend policy, share repurchase program and liquidity, and the issuance or retirement of debt and other capital securities;
reviewing and providing guidance to the Board on significant reinsurance transactions and strategies;
reviewing and providing guidance on the Company’s credit ratings, ratings strategy, and overall rating agency dialogue;
reviewing and providing guidance to the Board on the financing strategy and capital impact of corporate development activities and multiyear strategic capital project expenditures;
reviewing and reassessing the Company’s overall hedging strategy, including foreign exchange and cash flow hedging, and ensuring proper governance over policies and procedures associated with trading in derivative instruments;
in partnership with the Compensation Committee, overseeing the Company’s processes for managing the finances of the employee pension and defined contribution benefit plans, including the related investment policies, actuarial assumptions, and funding policies; and
in partnership with the Audit and Risk Committee, reviewing and providing guidance on the Company’s corporate insurance coverages.

INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

overseeing the investment process and the policies, strategies, and programs of the Company and its subsidiaries relating to investment risk management;
periodically reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Global Investment Policy of the Company and its subsidiaries, and approving any changes to that policy;
reviewing and approving investment transactions made on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries; and
reviewing the performance of the investment portfolios of the Company and its subsidiaries.

20       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Meeting Attendance

The Board met 4 times in 2019, and all Directors attended at least 75% of the numbermeetings of shares held by the recommending shareholderBoard and the length of time such shares have been held.

To recommend a candidate for the Board, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing, including:(i) the name of the shareholder and evidence of the person’s ownership of Common Stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership; and (ii) the name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or qualifications to be a Director, and the candidate’s consent to be named as a Director if nominated by the Board.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to the Corporate Secretary at Aflac Incorporated, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999, and must be received by the Corporate Secretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 25 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder, to be timely, must be so received no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the daycommittees on which such notice ofthey served. It is Company policy that each Director should attend the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made, whichever occurs first.

Shareholder recommendations and accompanying information should be sent to the Corporate Secretary at Aflac Incorporated as describedAnnual Meeting. All Directors serving at the end of this Proxy Statement undertime attended the heading “Other Proposals or Director Nominations to be brought before our 20182019 Annual Meeting.

Our proxy access bylaw permits a shareholder (or group of up to twenty shareholders) owning shares of our outstanding capital stock representing at least 3% of the votes entitled to be cast on the election of directors to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to 20% of the Board. The nominating shareholder or group of shareholders must have owned their shares continuously for at least three years, and the nominating shareholder(s) and nominee(s) must satisfy other requirements specified in our Bylaws.BOARD RESPONSIBILITIES

Enterprise-Wide Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management designed to achieve organizational and strategic objectives, to improve long-term performance, and to enhance shareholder value. Risk management requires more than just understanding the risks we face and the steps management takes to manage those risks. The Board also must understand what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. Our Directors are equipped to make all of these determinations because they are integral to the process of setting the Company’s business strategy.

While the Board of Directors oversees the risk managementrisk-management process generally, several Board and management committees have specific roles that correspond with their areas of responsibility.

Role of Management

The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management. Our enterprise risk-management framework, which is aligned with and overseen by the Board and its committees, includes several executive management committees whose roles incorporate risk management across the enterprise. For example, executive management’s Global Risk Committee oversees the processes for identifying, assessing, measuring, monitoring, controlling, and mitigating the key risks associated with the Company. Other management committees are responsible for implementing policies and risk-management processes relating to strategic, operational, investment, competitive, regulatory and legislative, product, reputational, and compliance risks.

Spotlight on Information Security Risk Oversight

The Board has adopted an information security policy directing management to establish and operate an information security program with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s information assets and data, and the data of its customers, are appropriately protected. The Board has delegated oversight of the Company’s information security program to the Audit and Risk Committee. The Company’s senior officers, including its Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer, are responsible for the operation of the information security program and regularly communicate with the Audit and Risk Committee on the program, including with respect to the state of the program, compliance with applicable regulations, current and evolving threats, and recommendations for changes in the information security program. The information security program also includes a cyber security incident response plan that is designed to provide a management framework across Company functions for a coordinated assessment and response to potential security incidents. This framework establishes a protocol to report certain incidents to the Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer and other senior officers, with the goal of timely assessing such incidents, determining applicable disclosure requirements and communicating with the Audit and Risk Committee. The incident response plan directs the executive officers to report certain incidents immediately and directly to the Lead Non-Management Director.

Audit and Risk Committee

Under its charter, the Audit and Risk Committee’s responsibilities include risk management and compliance oversight. Specifically, the Audit and Risk Committee:

discusses guidelines and policies governing the process by which senior management and the relevant departments of the Company assess and manage exposure to risk;
reviews the Company’s risk assessment and enterprise risk-management framework, including risk managementrisk-management guidelines, risk appetite, risk tolerances, key risk policies, and control procedures;

2020 Proxy Statement       21


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

reviews critical regulatory risk-management filings and enterprise risk-management material shared with regulators and rating agencies;
reviews the general structure, staffing models, and engagement of the Company’s risk governance departments and practices;
reviews the Company’s major financial risk exposures and evaluates processes and controls that management has adopted to monitor and controlmanage those risks;
meets in executive session with key senior leaders involved in risk management;
reviews with the internal auditors, the independent auditor, and the Company’s financial management team the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls, including information security policies and internal controls regarding information security, and any special steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies; and
reports to the Board, at least annually, with respect to matters related to key enterprise risks and risk management areas of concentration.

  20AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management Succession Planning

Finance and Investment Committee

The Finance and Investment Committee oversees the investment process and investment risk management of the Company and its subsidiaries by monitoring investment policies, strategies, and transactions and reviewing the performance of the investment portfolio.portfolio and overall capital and liquidity position of the Company.

Investment processThe manner in which we invest cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries and manage investments to emphasize safety, liquidity, returns, tax considerations, applicable laws and regulations, and conformity with the needs of each Company.the Company and its subsidiaries.
Investment riskIncludes liquidity risk, market risk, and credit risk.
Liquidity riskWhen an investment is not marketable and cannot be bought or sold quickly enough to prevent or minimize a loss.
Market riskThe risk that market movements will cause fluctuations in the value of our assets, the amount of our liabilities, or the income from our assets.
Credit riskThe risk of loss arising from the failure of a counterparty to perform its contractual obligations.
Enterprise:
Capital & Liquidity risk
Review of enterprise capital adequacy, access to capital, and maintenance of liquidity position to protect credit ratings and the Company’s ability to meet short and long-term obligations.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee strives to create incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking behavior consistent with the Company’s business strategy. As more fully discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee establishes incentive compensation performance objectives for management that are realistically attainable so as not to encourage excessive risk taking.

Management Committees

The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management. Our enterprise risk-management framework, which is aligned with and overseen by the Board and its Committees, includes several executive management committees whose roles incorporate risk management across the enterprise and who provide regular reports to the Board of Directors or its committees. For example, the global Disclosure Committee comprises senior managers from across the Company to ensure that disclosure controls and procedures are effective and that the information required to be disclosed to the investing public is accumulated and evaluated in a timely manner. Other management committees are responsible for implementing policies and risk-management processes relating to strategic, operational, investment, competitive, regulatory and legislative, product, reputational and compliance risks.

Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management Succession Planning

The Board of Directors, in coordination with the Corporate Governance Committee, is responsible for succession planning for key executives to ensure continuity in senior management. As part of that effort, the Board and the Corporate Governance Committee ensure that the Company has an appropriate process for addressing Chief Executive Officer succession planning in the event of extraordinary circumstances.

The Chief Executive Officer plays an active role in the succession-planning process. In coordination with the Company’s executive management team, including the General Counsel and the Director of Human Resources, the Chief Executive Officer periodically evaluates potential successors, reviews development plans recommended for such individuals, and makes recommendations to the Corporate Governance Committee. Together these parties also identify potential successors for critical executive management positions. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer reviews executive succession planning and management development at an annual executive session of independent Directors.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all Directors, executives, and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, there are provisions specifically applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Accounting Officer. The Company intends to satisfy any disclosure requirements regarding amendments to, or waivers from,of, any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our website, aflac.com, under “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance.“Governance,” then “Governance Documents.

Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management Succession Planning

The Board, in coordination with the Corporate Governance Committee, is responsible for succession planning for key executives to ensure continuity in senior management. As part of that effort, the Board and the Corporate Governance Committee ensure that the Company has an appropriate process for addressing Chief Executive Officer succession as a matter of regular planning and in the event of extraordinary circumstances.

22       Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

21

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

The Chief Executive Officer plays an active role in the succession-planning process for other executive management positions. In coordination with the Company’s executive management team, including the General Counsel and the Director of Human Resources, the Chief Executive Officer periodically evaluates potential successors, reviews development plans recommended for such individuals, and makes recommendations to the Corporate Governance Committee. Together these parties also identify potential successors for other critical executive management positions. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer reviews executive succession planning and management development at an annual executive session of independent Directors.

Commitment to Social Responsibility and Sustainability

As noted above, the Company has a dedicated, Board-level committee, which oversees the Company’s policies, procedures, and practices with respect to corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Specifically, the Board, through this committee, receives updates on the business’ focus on certain U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, environmental initiatives, workplace diversity and inclusion efforts, and philanthropic activities. The Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee also monitors the preparation of and reviews the Company’s annual Corporate Social Responsibility report, which provide more detail around CSR and sustainability initiatives and which are available on our website, aflac.com, under “About Aflac,” then “Corporate Citizenship.”

Recently, the Company launched a digital ESG hub at esg.aflac.com. The purpose of the hub is to provide enhanced disclosures of the Company’s environmental and social efforts. These disclosures align with the Global Reporting Initiative, United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board.

Shareholder Outreach

The Company has a long history of engaging shareholders to learn about the issues and concerns that are important to them. We believe that open communications can have a positive influence on our corporate governance practices. For example, we are proud to have been the first publicly traded company in the United States to voluntarily allow shareholders a say-on-pay vote. In keeping with this governance philosophy, we communicate with our shareholders on a regular basis and incorporate their feedback into our decision-making process.

Our Approach

YEAR-ROUND ENGAGEMENT

Aflac Incorporated’s Investor and Rating Agency Relations proactively engages year-round with shareholders and fixed income investors, both:

current and prospective
retail and institutional
portfolio management and stewardship teams

These efforts often include executive management and extend to:

proxy advisory firms,
ESG rating firms and
credit rating agencies

Both outside of and leading up to the annual meeting, the Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Secretary conduct meetings (in person when possible and by telepresence) and calls to update investors and regularly relay feedback to the Chairman, Lead Non-Management Director and the Board.

 

2020 Proxy Statement       |23


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Communications with Directors

Communications with Directors

Shareholders and other interested parties may contact members of the Board by mail. If you wish to communicate with the Board, of Directors, any individual Director, or any group or committee of Directors, address your correspondence to the Board or to such individual Director, group, or committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary of Aflac Incorporated, at the following address: 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999. The Corporate Secretary will forward any message that is not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material.

It is Company policy that each Director should attend the Annual Meeting. Twelve Directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Board and CommitteesGovernance Documents

The Board of Directors met four times in 2016, and all Directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the Committees on which they served.

The Board of Directors has seven standing committees: Audit and Risk; Compensation; Corporate Development; Corporate Governance; Executive; Finance and Investment; and Sustainability. Each committee (other than the Executive Committee) operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. Charters for the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance Committee, as well as the Company’s Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues, and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other governance-related documents, all can be found on the Company’s website, aflac.com, under “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance.“Governance,” then “Governance Documents.” Shareholders can request printed copies of these documents by submitting a request to the Corporate Secretary at the address shown above.

MEMBERS

Douglas W. Johnson

(Chairman and

The Audit and Risk Committee
financial expert)RESPONSIBILITIES

W. Paul Bowers

(financial expert)

Charles B. Knapp

(financial expert)

Karole F. Lloyd

(financial expert)

Joseph L. Moskowitz

(financial expert)

Melvin T. Stith

(financial expert)

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

11

    ensuring that management maintains the reliability and integrity of the reporting process and systems of internal controls of the Company and its subsidiaries regarding finance, accounting, and legal matters;

    issuing annually the Audit and Risk Committee Report set forth below;

   selecting, overseeing, evaluating, determining funding for, and, where appropriate, replacing or terminating the independent registered public accounting firm and monitoring that firm’s independence;

●   pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm;

●   pre-approving or ratifying all related person transactions that are required to be disclosed in this Proxy Statement;

●   overseeing the performance of the Company’s internal auditing department;

●   assisting with Board oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

●   overseeing the Company’s policies, process, and structure related to enterprise risk engagement and management; and

●   providing an open avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, the internal auditing department, and the Board.

PURPOSE
The independent registered public accounting firm has direct access to the Audit and Risk Committee and may discuss any matters that arise in connection with its audits, the maintenance of internal controls, and any other matters relating to the Company’s financial affairs. The Audit and Risk Committee may authorize the independent registered public accounting firm to investigate any such matters, and may present its recommendations and conclusions to the Board. At least annually, the Audit and Risk Committee reviews the services performed and the fees charged by the independent registered public accounting firm.All Audit and Risk Committee members qualify as “outside” Directors as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, “Non-employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and independent Directors under the NYSE listing standards, and have been determined by the Board to be “audit committee financial experts,” as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of SEC Regulation S-K. Ms. Lloyd joined the Audit and Risk Committee upon her appointment to the Board on January 6, 2017; Dr. Stith will no longer serve on the Audit and Risk Committee after May 1, 2017

22

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Board and Committees

MEMBERS

Robert B. Johnson

(Chairman)

The Compensation Committee
Joseph L. MoskowitzRESPONSIBILITIES

Douglas W. Johnson

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

6

●   reviewing, at least annually, the goals and objectives of the Company’s executive compensation plans;

●   evaluating annually the performance of the CEO with respect to such goals and objectives and determining the appropriate compensation level;

●   evaluating annually the performance of the Company’s other executive officers in light of such goals and objectives, and setting their compensation levels based on this evaluation and the recommendation of the CEO;

●   reviewing the Company’s incentive compensation programs to determine whether they encourage excessive risk taking, and evaluating compensation policies and practices that could mitigate any such risk; and

●   reviewing the Company’s general compensation and benefit plans to ensure they promote our goals and objectives.

PURPOSE

The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves compensation levels, equity-linked incentive compensation, and annual incentive awards under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan.

The Compensation Committee recommended and the Board adopted a policy regarding Non-employee Director compensation and actual Non-employee Director compensation levels consistent with that policy. If the Board creates a special purpose committee made up of Non-employee Directors, the Compensation Committee recommends remuneration for the individuals who serve. The Board makes final determinations regarding Non-employee Director compensation.

The members of the Compensation Committee are Robert B. Johnson (Chairman), Joseph L. Moskowitz, and Douglas W. Johnson. All of these

individuals are “outside” Directors as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, “Non-employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and independent Directors under NYSE listing standards.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former employee or officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During 2016, no Director was an executive officer of another entity on whose compensation committee any executive officer of the Company served. In addition, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under the section titled “Related Person Transactions” in this Proxy Statement.

MEMBERS

W. Paul Bowers

(Chairman)

The Corporate Development Committee
Elizabeth J. HudsonRESPONSIBILITIES

Charles Knapp

Joseph L. Moskowitz

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

2

●   reviewing the Company’s corporate and strategic organization development to identify, evaluate, and execute on appropriate opportunities that could enhance long-term growth and build shareholder value;

●   assisting the Board in reviewing, evaluating and approving specific strategic plans for corporate development activities including mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, joint venture marketing and distribution arrangements, and strategic equity investments;

●   assisting the Board in reviewing proposals to enter new geographic markets; and

●   reviewing corporate development proposals prepared by the Company’s officers and managers and other strategic projects as determined by the Board to ensure consistency with achieving long-term strategic objectives.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

23

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Board and Committees

MEMBERS

Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH

The Corporate Governance Committee
(Chair)RESPONSIBILITIES

Robert B. Johnson

Melvin T. Stith

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

3

   selecting individuals qualified to serve as Directors to be nominated to stand for election to the Board;

   recommending assignments to the Board’s standing committees;

   advising the Board with respect to matters of Board structure, composition and procedures;

   developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;

   monitoring compliance with the Company’s political participation program;

   overseeing the evaluation of the Board; and

   ensuring that the Company’s management and succession plans are appropriate.

The members of the Corporate Governance Committee are Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH (Chair), Robert B. Johnson, and Melvin T. Stith. All Corporate Governance Committee members qualify as “outside” Directors as defined bySection 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, “Non-employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and independent Directors under NYSE listing standards.

MEMBERS

Daniel P. Amos

(Chairman)

The Executive Committee
Paul S. Amos IIPURPOSE

Kriss Cloninger

Douglas W. Johnson

Robert B. Johnson

Barbara Rimer, DrPH

NUMBER OF

MEETINGS IN 2016

7

Under the Company’s Bylaws, the Executive Committee must consist of at least five Directors, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, and such additional Directors as the Board may from time to time determine. Currently, the membership of the Executive Committee also includes the chairpersons of the Audit and Risk, Compensation, and Corporate Governance

Committees, and includes the Company’s Lead Non-Management Director. The Chief Executive Officer (or another member of the Executive Committee chosen by him) is the Chairman of the Executive Committee. During the intervals between meetings of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers of the Board that may be delegated under Georgia law.
24

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Board and Committees

MEMBERS

Charles B. Knapp

(Chairman)

The Finance and Investment Committee
Paul S. Amos IIFINANCE RESPONSIBILITIES

Elizabeth J. Hudson

Thomas J. Kenny

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

7

●   reviewing and reassessing significant financial policies and matters of Treasury and corporate finance, including the Company’s overall capital structure, dividend policy, share repurchase program, liquidity, and the issuance or retirement of debt and other capital securities;

●   reviewing and providing guidance to the Board on significant reinsurance transactions and strategies;

●   reviewing and providing guidance on the Company’s credit ratings, ratings strategy, and overall rating agency dialogue;

●   reviewing and providing guidance to the Board on the financing strategy and capital impact of corporate development activities and multiyear strategic capital project expenditures;

●   reviewing and reassessing the Company’s overall hedging strategy, including foreign exchange and cash flow hedging, ensuring proper governance over policies and procedures associated with trading in derivative instruments;

●   in partnership with the Compensation Committee, overseeing the Company’s processes for managing the finances of the employee pension and defined contribution benefit plans, including the related investment policies, actuarial assumptions, and funding policies; and

●   in partnership with the Audit and Risk Committee, reviewing and providing guidance on the Company’s corporate insurance coverages.

INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

●   overseeing the investment process and the policies, strategies, and programs of the Company and its subsidiaries relating to investment risk management;

●   periodically reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Global Investment Policy of the Company and its subsidiaries, and approving any changes to that policy;

●   reviewing and approving investment transactions made on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries; and

●   reviewing the performance of the investment portfolios of the Company and its subsidiaries.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

25

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance|Board and Committees

MEMBERS

Elizabeth J. Hudson

(Chair)

The Sustainability Committee
W. Paul BowersRESPONSIBILITIES

Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH

NUMBER OF
MEETINGS IN 2016

2

●   helping the Board fulfill its responsibility to shareholders in regards to the policies and practices that relate to the sustainable growth of the U.S. operation of the Company and its subsidiaries;

●   overseeing the Company’s sustainability plans and practices, including internal policies and procedures as well as public-facing corporate policy;

●   helping management set strategy, establish goals, and integrate sustainability into the daily business activities of the Company’s U.S. operation;

●   formulating and implementing policies, procedures, and practices that permit the Company to respond to evolving public sentiment and government regulation in the areas of environmental stewardship, energy use, recycling and carbon emissions; and

●   reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s environmental activities and impacts.

PURPOSE
We believe “sustainable growth” means being able to meet the needs of our shareholders and customers while taking into account the needs of future generations, and also ensuring the long-term preservation and enhancement of the Company’s financial, environmental and social capital.In February 2017, the Sustainability Committee was renamed the Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee.
26

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Director CompensationDIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors who also serve as employees of the Company or its subsidiaries do not receive compensation as Board members. The Compensation Committee reviews the policy regarding total compensation for Non-employee Directors at least every other year and recommends compensation to the Board consistent with that policy. When making its recommendation, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, including the Non-employee Director pay packages at our peer group companies, the skills and backgrounds required of Non-employee Directors to serve on the Company’s Board, and the balance between the cash and equity components of the package. The Board makes final determinations regarding Non-employee Director compensation. In 2016, cash

Compensation Committee assess Director compensation and uses its independent compensation consultant to benchmark against peers every other year.

Cash Compensation

Cash compensation for the Non-employee Directors was as follows:

May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019
All Non-employee directorsDirectors$135,000 annually$115,000 annually
Audit and Risk Committee membersAdditional $10,000 annuallyAdditional $10,000 annually
Chairs—Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability, Corporate Development,Additional $15,000 annually
Chairs—Compensation, Finance and InvestmentAdditional $20,000 annuallyAdditional $20,000 annually
Chair—Audit and RiskAdditional $30,000 annuallyAdditional $30,000 annually
Chair—CompensationAdditional $25,000 annuallyAdditional $20,000 annually
Lead Non-Management DirectorAdditional $25,000$50,000 annuallyAdditional $35,000 annually

Upon joining the Board, every Non-employee Director is granted an award of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value as determined by the Board of Directors not in excess of the value of a nonqualified stock option covering 10,000 shares of Common Stock. In every year thereafter, the Non-employee Directors may, at the discretion of the Board, receive restricted stock, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, or a combination thereof with an aggregate dollar value that approximates $135,000. The values of these stock options and stock appreciation rights are determined based upon the most current Black-Scholes-Merton three-year period valuation price of option shares as determined by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. If the Board grants restricted stock, it may permit Non-employee Directors to elect to receive nonqualified stock options instead. In 2016, one Non-employee Director elected to receive nonqualified stock options covering 19,425 options of Common Stock, one Non-employee Director elected to receive half the grant in nonqualified stock options covering 9,713 options of Common Stock, and the remaining eight received all restricted stock. Grants of restricted stock made to Non-employee Directors in 2016 at the annual meeting become vested at the next annual meeting if the Non-employee Director continues to serve on the Board. Upon retirement, a Non-employee Director becomes immediately vested in all outstanding stock options and awards that have not yet expired. Retirement is defined as either (1) after ten years of service on the Board of Directors or (2) as of the date of the first annual Shareholders’ meeting of the Company on or after the date the Participant attains age 75, and is no longer eligible to stand for reelection as per the Bylaws of the Company. Beginning in 2017, these retirement provisions will no longer be included in award agreements. Upon death or disability or a change in control of the Company, Non-employee Directors will become 100% vested in all outstanding options and stock awards.

Non-employee Directors, with the exception of those who are, or within one year will become, retirement eligible, may elect to have all or a portion of their Board annual retainer paid in the form of immediately vested nonqualified stock options, restricted stock that vests after one year of continued service, or a combination thereof as determined by the Board of Directors.Board. In 2016,2019, one of the Non-employee DirectorsDirector elected to receive restricted stock in lieu of a cash annual retainer, and no Non-employee Director elected to receive stock options.

24       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Equity Compensation

As shown below, Non-employee Directors also receive equity on a regular basis to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our shareholders.

Timing of equity grantForm of equity grant(1)Value of equity grant(2)
Upon joining the Boardnonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or a combination thereofaggregate value as determined by the Board not in excess of the value of a nonqualified stock option covering 20,000 shares of Common Stock
Annually, at the discretion of the Boardrestricted stock, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, or a combination thereofaggregate dollar value of approximately $155,000
(1)If the Board grants restricted stock, it may permit Non-employee Directors to elect to receive nonqualified stock options instead. In 2019, no one made this election.
(2)The values of any stock options or stock appreciation rights are determined based upon the most current Black-Scholes-Merton three-year period valuation price of option shares as determined by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. For grants made in the three-year period of 2019 to 2021, our deemed fair value of a stock option is $6.54.

Non-employee Directors are required to hold shares worth at least four times the amount of the annual cash retainer.

For additional information, please see “Stock Ownership Guidelines; Hedging and Pledging Restrictions” on page 44.

Vesting

Grants of stock options or, if elected, restricted stock, made to Non-employee Directors upon joining the Board become vested one year from the grant date, generally subject to continued service. Grants of restricted stock or, if elected, stock options, made to Non-employee Directors at the time of an annual meeting become vested at the next annual meeting, generally subject to continued service. Upon death or disability or a change in control of the Company, Non-employee Directors will become 100% vested in all outstanding options and stock awards.

Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a retirement plan for Non-employee Directors who have attained age 55 and completed at least five years of service on the Board, but that plan was closed to new participants effective 2002.2002 and Dr. Rimer is the only Non-employee Director who participates in the retirement plan. The dollar value and length of payment of the annual retirement benefits were frozen effective May 3, 2010. For qualifying participants, payments under the plan begin upon termination of service as a Non-employee Director and continue for the shorter of the number of years the participant served as Non-employee Director prior to May 3, 2010, or the life of the participant (or, if applicable, his or her surviving spouse). On an annual basis, such payments are equal to the annual compensation paid to a participant during his or her service as a Non-employee Director during the 12-month period immediately preceding May 3, 2010, excluding committee fees, and subject to a cap of $30,000 for the annual retainer fee and $2,000 per meeting. The Non-employee Directors do not participate in any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

For additional information, please see “Stock Ownership Guidelines; Hedging and Pledging Restrictions” beginning on page 44.2020 Proxy Statement       25


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

27

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Matters

Director Compensation

20162019 Director Compensation

The following table identifies each item of compensation paid to Non-employee Directors for 2016.2019.

   Change in Pension  
    Value and  
    Nonqualified  
    Deferred  
 Fees Earned or PaidStockOptionCompensation  
 in CashAwardsAwardsEarningsAll Other 
 (2)(3)(4)(5)CompensationTotal
Name(1)($)($)($)($)($)($)
W. Paul Bowers140,000135,011275,011
Toshihiko Fukuzawa76,667134,527211,194
Elizabeth J. Hudson130,000135,0114,724269,735
Douglas W. Johnson175,000261,18510,401446,586
Robert B. Johnson135,000135,011270,011
Thomas J. Kenny115,032135,011250,043
Charles B. Knapp145,000135,0112,99313,473296,477
Joseph L. Moskowitz125,00067,540130,59912,844335,983
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH130,000135,0113,803268,814
Melvin T. Stith125,000135,011260,011

*   Takuro Yoshida’s term on the Board of Directors ended May 2, 2016.

Name(1)     Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash(2)
($)
    Stock
Awards(3)
($)
     Option
Awards(4)
($)
      Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
($)
     All Other
Compensation
($)
     Total
($)
W. Paul Bowers205,000155,046360,046
Toshihiko Fukuzawa125,000155,046280,046
Douglas W. Johnson*62,50062,500
Robert B. Johnson150,000155,046305,046
Thomas J. Kenny145,040155,046300,086
Georgette D. Kiser77,083130,847207,930
Karole F. Lloyd165,000155,046320,046
Joseph L. Moskowitz135,000155,046290,046
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH145,000155,04617,115317,161
Katherine T. Rohrer125,000155,046280,046
Melvin T. Stith145,000155,046300,046
*Douglas W. Johnson’s term on the Board of Directors ended May 6, 2019.
(1)Daniel P. Amos Paul S. Amos II, and Kriss Cloninger III areis not included in the table; they are employeestable because he is an employee and thus dodid not receive compensation for their servicehis services as Directors.a Director. The compensation received by these individualsMr. Amos as employeesan employee is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)Thomas J. Kenny elected to receive a portion of his annual retainer in restricted stock. The value of these shares on the grant date was $115,032.$135,040.
(3)This column represents the dollar amount recognized in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”) for financial statement purposes with respect to the 20162019 fiscal year for the fair value of restricted stock granted in 2016.2019. The fair values of the awards granted in 20162019 were calculated using the closing per-share stock price on the date of grant of $69.13.$50.52 for the awards granted on May 6, 2019. As of December 31, 2016, each2019, the following Non-employee DirectorDirectors held the following number of restricted stock awards: W. Paul Bowers, 6,740;3,069; Toshihiko Fukuzawa, 1,946; Elizabeth J. Hudson, 4,125;3,069; Robert B. Johnson, 4,125;3,069; Thomas J. Kenny, 4,405;5,742; Georgette D. Kiser, 2,590; Karole F. Lloyd, 3,069; Joseph L. Moskowitz, 2,527;3,069; Barbara K. Rimer, 3,069; Katherine T. Rohrer, 3,069; and Melvin T. Stith, 6,078. The following shares issued3,069.
(4)No Directors received stock options in 2016 to the retirement eligible Non-employee directors, as defined in the equity agreements, were accelerated to vest within the year and are not included in the number of restricted shares held: Elizabeth J. Hudson, 1,953; Robert B. Johnson, 1,953; Charles B. Knapp, 1,953, and Barbara K. Rimer, 1,953.
(4)In accordance with the SEC’s reporting requirements, this column represents the dollar amount recognized in accordance with ASC 718 for financial statement purposes with respect to the 2016 stock option grants. The Company’s valuation assumptions are described in Note 12 “Share-Based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2016. Stock options granted to Non-employee Directors vest in one year.2019. As of December 31, 2016, each non-employee Director2019, the following Non-employee Directors held stock options covering the following number of shares of Common Stock: Elizabeth J. Hudson, 25,026; Douglas W. Johnson, 62,661; Robert B. Johnson, 7,000; Thomas J. Kenny, 14,735; Charles B. Knapp, 48,749;29,470; Joseph L. Moskowitz, 9,713;41,729; and Barbara K. Rimer, 38,249; and Takuro Yoshida, 31,988.108,348.
(5)Represents change in pension value. W. Paul Bowers, Toshihiko Fukuzawa, Douglas W. Johnson, Robert B. Johnson, Thomas J. Kenny, Joseph L. Moskowitz, Melvin T. Stith and Takuro YoshidaBarbara K. Rimer participates in the Directors’ retirement plan. The other directors do not participate in the DirectorDirectors’ retirement plan since they first became Directors after the plan was closed to new participants in 2002.

26       Aflac Incorporated


28

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Executive SummaryCompensation

02
Proposal 2
Executive Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)
We are committed to achieving a high level of total return for our shareholders. From the end of August 1990, when Daniel P. Amos was appointed the CEO, through December 31, 2019, the Company’s total return to shareholders, including reinvested cash dividends, has exceeded 8,913%, compared with 2,111% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 1,748% for the S&P 500 Index, and 1,000% for the S&P 500 Life & Health Insurance Index over the same period.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR our executive compensation.

We believe our compensation policies and procedures are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Beginning in 2008, we voluntarily provided our shareholders an annual advisory vote (commonly known as “Say-on-Pay”), which is now required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this vote gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation of our named executive officers through the following resolution:

“Resolved, on an advisory basis, the shareholders of Aflac Incorporated approve the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and accompanying tables and narrative in the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.”

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the decisions made by the Compensation Committee related to those programs, and the factors considered when making those decisions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

28Executive Summary
32Compensation Design and Philosophy
362019 Executive Compensation
44Additional Executive Plan Compensation Practices and Procedures
45Compensation Committee Report

2020 Proxy Statement       27


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

This CD&A focuses on our NEOsnamed executive officers (“NEOs”) for 2016,2019, who were:

Named Executive OfficerTitle
DanielDANIEL P. AmosAMOS
Chairman, & Chief Executive Officer and President*
FrederickFREDERICK J. CrawfordCRAWFORD
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerOfficer*
Kriss Cloninger IIIPresident
Paul S. Amos IIPresident, Aflac
EricERIC M. KirschKIRSCH
Executive Vice President, Global Chief Investment Officer,Officer; President, Aflac Global Investments
CHARLES D. LAKE II
President, Aflac International; Chairman and Representative Director, Aflac Life Insurance Japan
MASATOSHI KOIDE
President and Representative Director, Aflac Life Insurance Japan
*Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Crawford was promoted to President, Chief Operating Officer.

Pay-for-PerformanceExecutive Summary

Pay-For-Performance Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation programs are designed to ensure that a substantial amount of executive pay is directly linked to the Company’s results. We believe this is the most effective method for creating shareholder value and that it has played a significant role in making the Company an industry leader. Importantly, performance-based elements of our compensation programs apply to all levels of Company management—not just the executive officers. In fact, pay-for-performance components permeate compensation at every employee level. As a result, we are able to attract, retain, motivate, and reward talented individuals who have the necessary skills to manage our growing global business on a day-to-day basis and to position the Company for success in the future.

Our executive compensation program is designed to drive shareholder value via three critical features:

1 2 3
A pay-for-performance philosophy and compensation program structure that directly motivates our executives to achieve our annual and long-term strategic and operational goals Compensation elements that help us attract and retain high-caliber talent to lead the Company “Best practice” compensation governance policies, such as stock ownership guidelines, clawback provisions, and no change-in-control excise tax gross-ups

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

29

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Executive Summary

Strong Compensation Governance Policies and Leader in Best Practices

The Company has been a leader in corporate governance best practices. Our executive compensation programs reflect the strong, long-standing governance principles outlined below.

What We DoWhat We Don’t Do

ìFirst public company in the U.S. to provide shareholders with a say-on-pay vote (voluntary action starting in 2008, three years before such votes were required)

ìPrioritize active engagement with our shareholders regarding our compensation program

ìHistory of responding to our shareholders’ feedback

ìAdherence to a rigorous pay for performance philosophy in establishing program design and targeted pay levels for its NEOs

ìIndependent Compensation Committee oversees the program

ìIndependent compensation consultant is hired by and reports to the Compensation Committee

ìAnnual report by theBoard’s independent compensation consultant to the full Board on CEO pay and performance alignment

ìLong-standing stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and Directors

ìLong-standing clawback policy

ìSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan frozen to new participants effective January 1, 2015

ìDouble trigger change-in-control requirements in all employment agreements

îNo golden parachute payments for CEO or President following a change in control

îOfficers and Directors may not implement 10b5-1 plans unless approved by the Compensation Committee

îOfficers and Directors may not hedge or engage in short sales of Company stock

îExecutive officers and Directors may not pledge Company stock, and “grandfathered” pledged Company stock does not count toward the stock ownership guidelines

îNo repricing underwater stock options

îNo change-in-control excise tax gross-ups

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained a nationally recognized compensation consultant, Mercer LLC, to assist and advise the Compensation Committee in its deliberations. Mercer works with the compensationCompensation Committee to review executive compensation practices, including the competitiveness of pay levels, design issues, market trends, and other technical considerations.

Mercer typically assists in the following areas:Our executive compensation program is designed to drive shareholder value via three critical features:

A pay-for-performance philosophy and compensation program structure that directly motivates our executives to achieve our annual and long-term strategic and operational goalsproviding comparative company performanceCompensation elements that help us attract and retain high-caliber talent to determine CEO pay;
lead the Companyevaluating the competitiveness of the Company’s executive“Best practice” compensation governance policies, such as stock ownership guidelines, clawback provisions, and benefit programs;
reviewing plan design issues and recommending improvements;
apprising the Compensation Committee of trends and developments in the marketplace;
assessing the relationship between executive pay and performance;
assessing proposed performance goals and ranges for incentive plans;
providing comparative company data to determine NEO compensation;
conducting training sessions for the Compensation Committee; and
determining the compensation of Non-employee Directors.no change-incontrol excise tax gross-ups

Fees paid to Mercer for these services totaled $286,295 in 2016. Management retained certain Mercer affiliates to provide additional services not pertaining to executive compensation during 2016, and approved payments totaling $16,139,173—primarily for broker commissions for insurance sales—for those services. As reported by Mercer to the Compensation Committee, these payments represented less than 0.15% of Mercer’s parent company’s annual revenue. The Compensation Committee has assessed Mercer’s independence pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists with respect to the work Mercer performs for the Committee.28       Aflac Incorporated


30

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion & Analysis2019 Business Overview

TSR
The Company’s stock hit an all-time highduring the year.
CASH DIVIDEND
+3.8%
ANNUAL TSR
+18.6%
3 YEAR TSR
+62.5%
We increased our cash dividend by3.8%, marking the37thconsecutive year of increasing the dividend.
Our annual total shareholder return* was18.6%, versus 23.2% for the S&P 500 Life and Health Insurance subindex.
Our annual total shareholder return* was62.5%, versus 13.6% for the S&P 500 Life and Health Insurance subindex.
Financial
Highlights

RETURN ON EQUITY
12.6%
NET EARNINGS
$3.3B
ADJUSTED EPS(1)
+6.3%
We generated a strong return on equity of 12.6%, and our AROE for the full year was 15.1%.
We generated net earnings of$3.3 billion, an increase of 13.2% over 2018.
Adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding the impact of foreign currency, grew6.3%.
Capital
SHARE REPURCHASE
$1.6B
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS*
1,043%
We repurchased approximately 32.0 million of the Company’s shares as part of a balanced capital allocation program.
Aflac Japan Solvency Margin Ratio
539%
Aflac Risk Based Capital

*

As of December 31, 2019

(1)

The adjusted earnings per share, excluding the impact of foreign currency, metric is one of the principal financial measures used to evaluate management’s performance, and we believe it continues to be a key driver of shareholder value.

On December 3, 2018, the Company gave guidance for 2019 consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share of $4.10 to $4.30 using an exchange rate of 110 ¥/$, which on a currency-neutral basis and normalized for certain tax items identified in 2018 equated to approximately a 3% increase. With the release of first quarter 2019 earnings, the Company affirmed the outlook at the 2018 weighted-average exchange rate of 110.39 ¥/$. After consistent strong performance in the first three quarters of 2019, the Company upwardly revised the range to $4.35 to $4.45. Ultimately, the Company reported adjusted earnings per diluted share of $4.44, or $4.42 excluding the effect of foreign currency, after continued strong performance driven by strong pretax profit margins supported by favorable benefit ratios and net investment income in Japan and the U.S., and disciplined capital management.

|2020 Proxy Statement      29


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

In 2019 the Company advanced the vision of offering high-quality supplemental products, solutions, and service through diverse distribution outlets, building upon our market-leading position to drive long-term shareholder value.

In Japan, management continued to strengthen relationships with customers and agencies by focusing on a new rider strategy. This rider strategy allowed Aflac Japan medical policyholders to update their existing coverage for advances in medical treatment as well as their stage in life by adding a mid-term rider to their existing policy without having to lapse. With this more flexible approach, Aflac Japan not only attracts and retains new customers, but also lowers new product refreshment costs and improves persistency. This strategy was instrumental in maintaining the Company’s status as the leading provider of both medical and cancer insurance in Japan. Results reflect a sharp decline in the sale of cancer products after Japan Post Group announced an internal investigation into the sale of insurance products through Japan Post Co., Ltd. and Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. While the investigation and eventual suspension of sale of Japan Post Insurance products did not involve the sale of Aflac Japan cancer policies, the events had a negative impact on cancer sales in the postal network. Despite the competitive market for cancer and medical insurance products, the persistent low interest rate environment in Japan and higher expenses related to technology investments and marketing, the Company exceeded its financial objectives—driving Aflac Japan’s pretax profit margin to the high end of the forecasted range.
In keeping with our vision to be the number one distributor of benefit solutions supporting the U.S. workforce, Aflac U.S. management continued to focus on serving the benefit needs of small businesses with its extensive agent distribution channel, as well as the needs of larger employers by continuing to build relationships with brokers. Results partially reflect a decline in recruiting and retention of commission-only agents in a strong economic environment. At the same time, Aflac U.S. continued to advance efforts to reach workers through a direct-to-consumer platform and associate partnerships. While the Company has been known for its organic growth, 2019 was also marked by prudent investments to promote growth and to drive efficiencies. Most notably, Aflac took an opportunity to accelerate growth through a measured buy-to-build transaction with the acquisition of Argus Dental and Vision. While these investments were largely responsible for the elevated expense ratio, Aflac U.S.’s pretax profit margin ended the year in the middle of the forecasted range.

Management and the Board are committed to ensuring comprehensive risk management and to safeguarding the Company’s financial strength. In 2019, core capital strength measures remained very strong. The Company’s strong capital and cash flow positions continue to support our financial strength ratings, which are among the highest in the industry, and our 37-year track record of increased Common Stock dividends.

Summary of Our Executive Compensation Program

ResponseAs a leader in our industry segment, we recognize that a sound executive management compensation program is one of the things that make us an employer of choice. Our executive compensation program directly links compensation incentives with our business goals and shareholder interests.

We consider annual and long-term incentive compensation to be the most important compensation awarded; these pay elements represent the largest part of total rewards for executives and provide the strongest link to Company results and shareholder value creation. Moreover, incentive compensation enables us to attract, retain, motivate, and reward talented individuals who have the necessary skills to manage our growing global enterprise now and for the future. Due to our focus on incentive compensation, base salary is the smallest component of compensation for the NEOs.

30     Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

KEY ELEMENTS OF OUR 2019 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

CEO pay mix
and Element
TermsPerformance Measure(s)Objective
Base salary
The fixed amount of annual cash compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities. Generally reviewed biennially for potential increase based on a number of factors, including market levels, performance, and internal equity.Levels set based on market data, job scope, responsibilities, experience, and individual performance.Attract and retain talent
Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”)
Annual variable cash compensation based on the achievement of predetermined annual performance goals.
Performance metrics align with our business strategy, geographic segment goals, and key value drivers:
Corporate goal: adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding the impact of foreign currency
U.S. goals: increase in new annualized premium, increase in earned premium
Japan goals: new annualized premium (third sector and first sector protection sales), increase in earned premium (third sector and first sector protection sales), increase in pretax adjusted earnings
Global Investments goals: net investment income; credit losses/impairments

Performance goals are rigorous and set to align the Company’s business plan with the expectation of achieving target performance.
Motivate executives and reward annual operational and strategic performance
Drive enterprise growth
Focus on key near-term drivers of long-term value for our business
Retain key talent
Exercise sound risk-management practices
Long-term incentives (“LTI”)
Long-term variable equity awards granted annually in performance-based restricted stock (“PBRS”) (100% of LTI for the CEO and other NEOs) under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan. PBRS vests based on three-year financial performance.AROE, Risk-Based Capital (“RBC”), and Solvency Margin Ratio (“SMR”) are metrics that affect our long-term business strategy and operating environment. Payout is also contingent on a relative TSR modifier.
Motivate executives and reward long-term operational and strategic performance
Focus on key long-term value drivers for our business
Align executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests
Retain key talent
Exercise sound risk-management practices

2020 Proxy Statement      31


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Outcome of 2019 Say-on-Pay Vote

The Company has a history and a well-earned reputation with its shareholders as a transparent organization. That commitment to transparency on all levels was certainly a driving force behind our decision in 2008 to allow shareholders a “say-on-pay” advisory vote, years before such votes became mandatory for allmost public companies. In 2016, 86%2019, 96% of our shareholders voted in favor of our executive compensation program.

Consistent with our approach in prior years, the Company engaged in shareholder outreach efforts throughout 2016.2019. The feedback from these conversations, together with a thorough analysis of best practices and guidance from our compensation consultant, was incorporated into the Compensation Committee’s regular review of our compensation practices. This review has prompted severalprograms.

Compensation program changes, to our compensation program over the years:

lIn 2014, we changed the process for setting the CEO’s compensation to better align that compensation with our relative financial and total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance. The prior method for setting the CEO’s pay had an inherent timing disconnect between performance and the related compensation as reported.
lIn 2015, we eliminated an overlap in performance metrics used in the annual non-equity incentive plan and the long-term equity incentive plan.
lIn 2016, we began using a three-year average vesting metric for performance-based restricted stock (“PBRS”), rather than vesting incrementally each year based on performance within the respective year.
lFor 2017, the Company made the following changes:
·Our Chairman & CEO received his entire target annual long-term incentive award in February 2017 at a market competitive level in relation to our peers.
·The long term incentive award for all NEOs was granted exclusively in the form of PBRS.
·The PBRS program was modified to include both upside and downside payout leverage, along with the incorporation of two additional performance metrics to better align the PBRS awards with our strategic and operational goals.
·The MIP program was modified to reflect a proactive approach to simplifying and aligning performance metrics and increasing the level of performance required to achieve maximum goals.

For more information, see “Program Changes for 2017,” which beginsif any, are made with a focus on page 42.

ensuring that pay is aligned with Company performance and corporate strategy. We continually analyze our policiescompensation program to ensure that we remain current in our approaches, a leader in executive compensation best practices, and cognizant of shareholder concerns. Moreover, we pride ourselves on incorporating ethics and transparency into everything we do, including compensation disclosure. Accordingly, we will continue our review and dialogue with investors to determine if additional changes are warrantedwarranted.

Compensation Design and Philosophy

Strong Compensation Governance Policies and Leader in 2017.Best Practices

2016 Business Overview

UnderThe Company has long been a leader in corporate governance best practices. Our executive compensation programs reflect the leadership of the CEO and executive management, the Company achieved strong, financial and operating results in 2016. The Company’s annual TSR as of December 31st was 19.1% and the Company’s stock hit an all-time high during the year.

From a financial standpoint, 2016 net earnings increased 5.0% to $2.7 billion and operating earnings per diluted share, excluding the impact of foreign currency, grew 4.7%. The operating earnings metric is one of the principal financial measures used to evaluate management’s performance, and we believe it continues to be a key driver

of shareholder value. The Company’s relative financial performance improved as EPS growth, return on revenues, return on average equity and return on average assets were in the top quartile in relation to our peers (see the “2016 Financial Performance Ranking Matrix” below).

In 2016, the Company advanced the vision of offering high-quality voluntary products, solutions and service through diverse distribution outlets, building upon the Company’s market-leading position to drive long-term shareholder value. In Japan, where the Company insures one in four households, management seized the opportunity in 2016 to strengthen relationships with sales channels and enhance the product line to ensure that the needs of consumers continue to be met. These actions were instrumental in maintaining the Company’s status as the leading provider of both medical and cancer insurance in Japan. Despite the negative interest rate environment in Japan, we were able to achieve our financial objectives. In the U.S., although new annualized premium sales came in below expectations last year, management was able to offset this with record profits and record persistency.

Management and the Board are committed to comprehensive risk management and safeguarding the financial strength of the Company. In 2016, core capital strength measures, SMR ratio in Japan and RBC ratio in U.S., remained very strong at 945% and 894% respectively. The Company’s strong capital and cash flow position continues to support strong financial strength ratings and a 34 year track record of increased common stock dividends.

long-standing governance policies outlined below.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENTWhat We Do

  31

What We Don’t Do

First public company in the U.S. to provide shareholders with a say-on-pay vote (voluntary action starting in 2008, three years before such votes were required)
Prioritize active engagement with our shareholders regarding our compensation program
History of responding to our shareholders’ feedback
Adherence to a rigorous pay-for-performance philosophy in establishing program design and targeted pay levels for NEOs
Independent Compensation Committee oversees the program
Independent compensation consultant is hired by and reports to the Compensation Committee
Annual report by the independent compensation consultant to the full Board on CEO pay and performance alignment
Long-standing stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and Directors
Long-standing clawback policy
Double trigger requirements in all employment agreements with change-in-control provisions
No golden parachute payments for CEO following a change in control
Officers and Directors may not implement 10b5-1 plans unless approved by the Compensation Committee
All employees are prohibited from hedging or engaging in short sales of Company stock
Executive officers and Directors may not pledge Company stock
No repricing underwater stock options
No change-in-control excise tax gross-ups

Process of Setting Executive Compensation

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained a nationally recognized compensation consultant, Mercer LLC (“Mercer”), to assist and advise the Compensation Committee in designing and refining the Company’s executive compensation program. Mercer typically assists in the following areas:

providing comparative company performance to determine NEO compensation;
evaluating the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation and benefit programs;
reviewing plan design issues and recommending improvements;

32     Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Executive SummaryCompensation

apprising the Compensation Committee of trends and developments in the marketplace;
assessing the relationship between executive pay and performance;
assessing proposed performance goals and ranges for incentive plans;
conducting training sessions for the Compensation Committee; and
proposing the compensation for Non-employee Directors.

SummaryFees paid to Mercer for these services totaled $220,225 in 2019. Management retained certain Mercer affiliates to provide additional services not pertaining to executive compensation during 2019, and approved payments for those services totaling $36,255. In addition, as the Company grows the sales of Our Executiveits insurance products through brokers in the U.S., this has resulted in commission payments totaling $34,834,880 during 2019 to the broker subsidiaries of Mercer. These subsidiaries are separate from the subsidiary that provides compensation consulting to the Company. As reported by Mercer to the Compensation Program

As a leader in our industry segment, we recognizeCommittee, the total payments from the Company represented less than 0.21% of Mercer’s parent company’s annual revenue. The Compensation Committee assessed Mercer’s independence pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that a sound management compensation program is a partno conflict of what makes us an employer of choice.

Base salary isinterest exists with respect to the smallest component of compensationwork Mercer performs for the NEOs. We consider annual and long-term incentive compensation to be the most important compensation awarded: these pay elements represent the largest part of total rewards for executives and provide the strongest link to Company results and shareholder value creation. Moreover, incentive compensation enables us to attract, retain, motivate and reward talented individuals who have the necessary skills to manage our growing global enterprise on a day-to-day basis, as well as for the future. As shown below, our executive compensation program directly links compensation incentives with our business goals and shareholder interests.

KEY ELEMENTS OF OUR 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

ElementTermsPerformance MeasureObjective
Base salaryThe fixed amount of annualcash compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities. Levels set based on market data, job scope, responsibilities and experience. Generally reviewed biennially for potential increase based on a number of factors, including market levels, performance and internal equityAttract and retain talent
Management
Incentive Plan
(“MIP”)
Annual variable cash compensation based on the achievement of predeterminedannual performance goals

Annual incentive award performance metrics align with our business strategy, geographic segment goals, and key value drivers:

Corporate Goals:Operating Earnings per share, OROE, Solvency Margin Ratio (SMR), Net Investment Income

U.S. Goals:increase in new annualized premiums, increase in premium income, increase in pretax operating earnings

Japan Goals:new annualized premiums, increase in premium income, increase in pretax operating earnings

Global Investments:credit losses/ impairments.

Performance goals are rigorous and set with the expectation of achieving target performance

Motivate executives and reward achievement toward annual operational and strategic goals

Focus on key short-term value drivers for our business

Retain key talent

Exercise sound risk management practices

Long-term
incentives
(“LTI”)
Long-term variable equity awards granted annually as a combination of PBRS and stock options. PBRS vests based on three-year financial performance, and options cliff vest after three years of service

PBRS (100% of LTI for CEO and President; 80% of LTI for other NEOs)

Risk-based capital (RBC) ratio metric represents key industry performance measure that aligns with creation of long-term value

Stock Options (0% of LTI for CEO and President; 20% of LTI for other NEOs)

Motivate executives and reward achievement toward long-term operational and strategic goals

Focus on key long-term value drivers for our business

Align executives’ interests with shareholder interests; stock options only provide value if share price increases

Retain key talent

Exercise sound risk management practices

32

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Committee.

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Elements of our Executive Compensation Program

Importance of the Peer Group

The Compensation Committee sets target compensation for the NEOs at market competitive levels with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant. Factors considered include target pay levels in the market for comparable roles, the primary duties and responsibilities of the role at the Company, and the individual’s relevant experience and performance.

As discussed in this CD&A, the Compensation Committee considers our peer group when setting compensation amounts orand targets. Each year, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, reviews the composition of the peer group to ensure it remains appropriate. Key factors the Compensation Committee considers during this annual review include operating characteristics, revenue size, asset size, profitability, market value, and total number of employees. Based on the annual review, the Compensation Committee selects a peer group of companies that are engaged in businesses similar to that of the Company, are of a similar size as the Company, and compete against the Company for talent. In terms of the size factors considered, the Company is positioned near the middle of this group.

2019 Peer Group
The Allstate Corporation
Assurant, Inc.
Brighthouse Financial
The Chubb Corporation
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Humana Inc.
Lincoln National Corporation
Manulife Financial Corporation
MetLife, Inc.
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
The Progressive Corporation
Prudential Financial, Inc.
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
Unum Group

The 20162019 peer group which has not changed since 2013, consistsreflects two changes from the peer group used in 2018. First, Aetna Inc. was removed because it was acquired by CVS Health, and its operating characteristics are unlike the Company’s other peers. Second, CIGNA Corporation was removed following its acquisition of Express Scripts and is much larger in revenue size than the companies shown at right.peer group norm.

The data below shows how the Company’s revenues, total assets, and market value compare to the peer group medians for those metrics.medians:

(in millions)Revenue
(1)
    Total Assets
(2)
    Market Value
(3)
($ millions)Revenue(1)Total Assets(2)Market Value(2)
Aflac Incorporated$21,216(4) $129,530(4) $28,404     $22,307     $152,768     $38,830
Peer Median$27,095 $108,537 $27,294$31,581$119,950$35,349
Percentile Rank for Aflac Incorporated vs. Peers44th54th69th
(1)For the trailing twelve monthsyear ending September 30, 2016December, 31, 2019.
(2)As of September 30, 2016
(3)As of December 31, 2016, when data was compiled2019.

2020 Proxy Statement       33


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Performance-Based Compensation: How Performance Goals Are Set

The Board and the Compensation Committee believe it is important for the Company to manage the business to provide long-term value to our shareholders. Therefore, performance goals under the MIP and LTI program involve metrics that drive shareholder returns, and payouts depends entirely upon the level of achievement of those goals. The following sections provide detail on how we select metrics under the MIP and LTI program, determine performance target amounts and other important considerations in setting these targets.

We have used the same methodology for setting MIP goals for many years. MIP segment metrics for Aflac U.S., Aflac Japan, and Global Investments are consistent with assumptions used in developing segment financial projections (described below) based on the Company’s best estimates for the coming year. The segment projections are consolidated into the corporate financial projection used to develop earnings per share guidance.

The goal-setting process generally proceeds in two stages.

1.The Company’s CEO, President and COO, and CFO recommend to the Compensation Committee the specific Company performance objectives that are aligned with corporate strategy, and thus will drive shareholder value and ensure financial soundness. Recommended ranges are based, in part, on past performance results and scenario tests of the Company’s financial outlook as projected by a complex financial model. The model projects the impact on various financial measures using different levels of total new annualized premium, investment returns, budgeted expenses, morbidity, and persistency.
2.The Compensation Committee refers to these modeled results to establish a target performance level, as well as a minimum and maximum level, for each performance measure. The target goal is not equidistant between the minimum and maximum goals. Instead, for the majority of metrics the MIP payout curve is “sloped” to require significant above-target performance reviewto achieve a maximum payout. Correspondingly, the payout for a minimum result is one-half of the target payout, while the payout for the maximum goal (or better) is twice the target payout. No payouts are made for performance below the minimum goal. Interpolation is used to calculate incentive payouts for results between minimum and target goals or target and maximum goals. The 2019 MIP goals were approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2019.

For 2019, the Compensation Committee established the following metrics under the MIP:

(4)Figures are net ofCorporate Metric: Adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding foreign currency effect
2016 Peer GroupU.S. Segment: New Annualized Premium and Earned Premium
l   Aetna Inc.Japan Segment: New Annualized Premium, Earned Premium, and Pretax Adjusted Earnings
l   The Allstate CorporationGlobal Investment Metrics: Net Investment Income (U.S. and Japan GAAP Segments only) and Credit Losses/Impairments

Considerations in setting the target goal amount for each of these MIP metrics are described in more detail below.

Importance of Measuring Management’s Performance Excluding the Impact of Currency

Since 1991, the Company has communicated external earnings guidance that excludes foreign currency effects. Similarly, MIP objectives are set on a currency-neutral basis.

Aflac Japan’s performance is important to our results, as the Japan segment reflects approximately 69% of total revenues for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Company’s reported U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) revenue, earnings, assets, book value, and cash flow are affected by changes in the relative values of the yen and the dollar, which is outside management’s control. Recognizing that strengthening and weakening of the yen can affect the value of the Company’s shares, the Compensation Committee believes it is important to ensure that executives bear the same exposure to the yen/dollar exchange rate as our shareholders and that equity awards under the LTI program and stock ownership requirements serve to align management with shareholders. When setting the MIP objectives, the Compensation Committee strongly believes that management should not be unduly rewarded because of short-term movement in the yen/dollar exchange rate when the yen is strong or penalized in periods of yen weakening when those currency shifts influence key incentive compensation metrics.

MIP Target-Setting Considerations

In addition to currency neutrality, the Compensation Committee considers the prior year’s results, current business operating environment and the forecasts emerging from the Company’s strategic planning process when setting MIP objectives for each metric. For example, new product launches and distribution expansion can materially affect the Company’s sales results in Japan from one year to the next. In addition, low interest rates were expected to continue in 2019, especially in Japan. A low-rate environment would continue to pressure Aflac Japan’s net investment income, as private placement investments were called or matured, and lead the Company to continue actively managing down sales of first sector savings-type products, which have returns that are more interest-rate sensitive. The goals for these metrics are generally consistent with the Company’s public guidance as provided during the annual December Outlook Call.

34       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

CORPORATE METRIC

In 2018, the Company generated $2.9 billion in net earnings and an increase in adjusted earnings per diluted share on a currency-neutral basis of 21.5% to $4.13, driven by strength in core margins, investment income and a lower effective tax rate resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”). These results were above the (split-adjusted) range of $3.90 to $4.06 a share, assuming the 2017 weighted-average exchange rate of 112.16 yen to the dollar, which was upwardly revised with the release of better than expected earnings for the first half of 2018. In addition, these results were especially meaningful given the low-interest-rate environment in Japan and increased expenses associated with the build-out of our technology platform in both segments. Within the context of Japan’s low-rate environment, we planned to continue shifting capital away from lower return, asset-leveraged first sector savings products to higher return third sector business. The impact of this strategy emerges over time in the form of improved Japan regulatory earnings and cash flow but pressured GAAP revenues and earnings over the course of the transition. We expect our third sector benefit ratio to continue benefiting from favorable claims trends. Likewise, in the U.S., our assumptions included a continuation of experiencing favorable benefit ratios and underlying claims trends. At the same time, we expected expense ratios to be elevated in both segments as a result of continued investment in IT platforms and digital growth initiatives. We assumed net investment income to be stabilized in Japan but still pressured by low rates, while also challenged by our planned capital draw down in the U.S. When taken all together, the Compensation Committee increased the 2019 adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding the impact of foreign currency, target and range from 2018 levels, and “sloped” those goals as described above in order to properly challenge management to achieve maximum payout results.

U.S. AND JAPAN SEGMENT METRICS

In 2018, Aflac U.S. sales increased 3.16% to $1.6 billion, which amounted to the largest sales year in the history of Aflac U.S. The 2018 sales were driven by improvements in productivity and strong growth in broker distribution. In addition, net earned premium increased 2.61% and benefited from strong sales and record persistency, which was 78.7% at the end of 2018.

Looking into 2019, Aflac U.S. expected to maintain its dominance in the small case market (i.e., employers with less than 100 employees) through agency distribution and an expanding broker business, which was growing at a faster rate than agency distribution. In the U.S., metrics take into account long-term growth strategies that require near-term investment such as expansion of network dental and vision and direct to consumer digital sale of insurance products. On the back of such success in 2018, the Company expected Aflac U.S. to deliver stable sales growth in 2019 within a range of 3% to 5.5% driven by improved productivity of agents and brokers and stable persistency which led to 2% to 3% growth of net earned premium in 2019.

Also, 2018 marked Aflac Japan’s largest combined sales of third sector and first sector protection in a decade, with ¥93.9 billion in sales, which was largely driven by the very successful launch of new cancer insurance products, Days 1 and Days 1 Plus, through all distribution channels, including more than 20,000 Japan Post offices. Aflac Japan planned to continue focusing on third sector sales complemented to a lesser degree by the sales of first sector protection insurance products in 2019 primarily in exclusive agencies. However, the successful launch of new cancer insurance products in 2018 presented challenging comparable sales for 2019, and the 2019 sales strategy included the introduction of a new mid-term rider strategy for medical insurance policies. While this mid-term rider strategy preserves and builds upon the favorable economics of Aflac Japan’s inforce policies, the strategy naturally pressures sales as defined by incremental annual rider premium versus the additional premium that would accompany the sale of a whole policy. Therefore, the Company expected third sector and first sector protection sales to decline in the low-single-digit range. At the same time, certain medical policies sold on a limited pay basis in prior years would reach paid up status, and the related negative impact would be reflected in third sector earned premium. As a result, the Compensation Committee concluded that a lower range for sales and earned premium for third and first sector protection products that incorporated the success of the prior year and new rider strategy was justified for 2019. The Compensation Committee set a range of ¥86.4 billion to ¥94.4 billion for third sector and first sector protection sales and third sector and first sector protection earned premium to increase 0.75% to 1.6%.

GLOBAL INVESTMENTS METRICS

For 2019, Aflac Japan net investment income including hedge costs was expected to modestly decline, driven by higher yielding calls and maturities with lower projected reinvestment yields, reducing yen stable income. In addition, we expected overall spread compression on fixed rate yen and dollar asset classes including floaters. Partially offsetting these headwinds, the Company planned increased net investment income from the build-out of the U.S. dollar floating rate portfolio and growth in the alternatives portfolio, which increased variable net investment income.

The Company also expected net investment income for Aflac U.S. to decline, partially reflecting lower yields and spreads as well as a reduction of assets as part of the RBC drawdown strategy, which modestly shifted net investment income from our Aflac U.S. segment to Aflac Incorporated.

Strong outperformance in 2018 as well as the growing floating rate and alternatives portfolios resulted in widening and sloping of the net investment income MIP metrics. In order to properly balance income and risk, targets for 2019 were expressed as a range around budget based on a bottom-up review of asset allocation and cash flows and were sloped accordingly to require above budget performance for maximum payout while not encouraging excessive risk-taking.

2020 Proxy Statement       35


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Equity Granting Policies

Each year, typically in February, the Compensation Committee meets shortly after the Company’s fiscal year results are released to the public. At that time, the Compensation Committee reviews recommendations developed by the CEO, President and COO, and CFO (with input from Mercer) for LTI awards of PBRS, stock options, and time-based restricted stock. Option grants are awarded on the date of the meeting, and have a per share exercise price set at the closing price on the date of grant. The Company has never engaged in “backdating” of options. For PBRS, the specific Company performance objectives are aligned with long-term corporate strategy, and thus are intended to drive shareholder value and ensure financial soundness.

For 2019, the Compensation Committee established the following metrics for the 2019 PBRS grant:

Adjusted Return on Shareholders’ Equity
l   Assurant, Inc.Risk Based Capital
l   The Chubb Corporation
l   CIGNA Corporation
l   CNO Financial Group, Inc.
l   Genworth Financial, Inc.
l   The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
l   Humana Inc.
l   Lincoln National Corporation
l   Manulife Financial Corporation
l   MetLife, Inc.
l   Principal Financial Group, Inc.
l   The Progressive Corporation
l   Prudential Financial, Inc.
l   The Travelers Companies, Inc.
l   Unum Group
Solvency Margin Ratio

We showTotal Shareholder Return Relative to Peer Group (RTSR) acts as a modifier. The Company may periodically make additional equity grants during the Company’s 2016 performance relative tocourse of the peer group onyear, but as a varietymatter of metrics belowpolicy does not make equity grants in the “CEO and Presidentadvance of material news releases.

2019 Executive Compensation and Pay-for Performance” section

Elements of this CD&A.Our Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary

Base salary is typically the smallest component of total compensation for the NEOs; the majority of their compensation comes from performance-based cash and equity awards.

The base salaries of our executive officers are competitively positioned relative to comparable executives at our peers and in the broader insurance sector, generally targeting market median, but also reflect each individual’s scope of responsibilities and performance. The Compensation Committee uses comparative market data onfor salaries in reviewing and determining the CEO’s salary, and the CEO uses thatthe market data to inform his recommendations forto the Compensation Committee regarding the salaries of the other executive officers.

Mr. Daniel P. Amos has not received a salary increase in the last fiveeight years. Messrs.Mr. Crawford Cloninger, and KirschMr. Lake did not receive a salary increase in 2019. Mr. Kirsch and Mr. Koide received base salary increases in 2016. Mr. Paul S. Amos received a base salary increase of approximately 3.3% for 2016 due to a change in his role9.5% and responsibilities and in order15%, respectively, to align histheir base salarysalaries competitively relative to similar roles in the market.market and to help secure their continued service and leadership for the Company.

Management Incentive Plan (MIP)

All of the NEOs are eligible to participate in the MIP, an annual non-equity incentive plan, referred to as the MIP, which was originally submitted to and approved by shareholders in 2012. See proposal 6 for the adoption of a newThe current MIP, which will bebecame effective January 1, 2018, (Appendix B).was approved by shareholders in 2017.

TARGET MIP

The Compensation Committee, with assistance from its independent compensation consultant, established target MIP levels for 2019 for the NEOs. These targets, shown below, were determined to be competitive generally relative to market median targets for executives with comparable positions within our peer group.

The MIP payouts for the NEOs cannot exceed two times their target.

AFLAC INCORPORATEDNamed Executive Officer

2017 PROXY STATEMENTTarget MIP
(as percent of
base salary)

Daniel P. Amos     33220%
Frederick J. Crawford125%
Eric M. Kirsch200%
Charles D. Lake II100%
Masatoshi Koide115%

36       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

HOW MIP PERFORMANCE GOALS ARE SET

The Board of Directors believes it is important for the Company to manage the business to provide long-term value to our shareholders. Therefore, performance goals under the MIP involve metrics that drive shareholder returns.

The MIP payout depends entirely upon the level of achievement of performance goals. We have used the same methodology for setting MIP goals for many years:

lMIP segment metrics for Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan are consistent with assumptions used in developing segment financial projections (described below) based on the Company’s best estimates for the coming year.
lThe segment projections are consolidated into the corporate financial projection used to develop earnings per share guidance.

First, the Company’s CEO, President, and CFO recommend to the Compensation Committee the specific Company performance objectives aligned with corporate strategy, driving shareholder value and ensuring financial soundness. Recommended ranges are based, in part, on past performance results and scenario tests of the Company’s financial outlook as projected by a complex financial model. The model projects the impact on various financial measures using different levels of total new annualized premium sales, investment returns, budgeted expenses, morbidity, and persistency.

After receiving recommendations for each performance measure, the Compensation Committee establishes a target performance level, as well as a minimum and maximum level. Typically, the target goal is equidistant between the minimum and maximum goals. The payout for a minimum result is one-half of the target payout, while the payout for a maximum result is twice the target payout; no payouts would be made for performance below the minimum level of performance. Interpolation is used to calculate incentive payouts for results between minimum and target or target and maximum.

The annual incentive goals for each performance measure typically are set in February for the current calendar year. At this time, the Compensation Committee assesses management’s recommendations and approves or, if deemed appropriate, modifies those goals for the year. This CD&A discusses MIP goals that were approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2016.

IMPORTANCE OF NEUTRALIZING FOREIGN CURRENCY EFFECTS

Since 1991, the Company has communicated external earnings guidance that excludes foreign currency effects. Our Japanese business is important to our results, but currency changes are largely outside of management’s control. However, reported earnings do reflect the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Our Japanese segment’s revenues, including realized gains and losses on it investment portfolio, accounted for 71% of the Company’s total revenues in 2016. The percentage of the Company’s total assets attributable to the Japan segment was 83% at December 31, 2016.

The Compensation Committee strongly believes that management should not be unduly rewarded when the yen is strong or penalized in periods of yen weakening, which is why MIP objectives are set on a currency-neutral basis.

MIP PERFORMANCE METRICS

The incentive measures include statistical and non-GAAP financial measures, as more fully described below. Appendix C to this proxy statement provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the corresponding GAAP measures.

Corporate metrics

Operating earnings per diluted share and operating return on shareholders’ equity (“OROE”)both are calculated to exclude the impact of foreign currency effect. We define operating earnings per diluted share as:

the profits derived from operations, including interest cash flows associated with notes payable, before realized investment gains and losses from securities transactions, impairments, derivative and hedging activities, and other nonrecurring items

÷

theweighted-average number ofshares outstanding fortheperiod, plus anumber of weighted-average shares to compensate forthe dilutiveeffect ofshare-based awards

34

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Operating earnings per diluted share growth is computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the prior year, which eliminates fluctuations from currency rates that can magnify or suppress reported results in dollar terms.

In 2016, we defined OROE as:

the profits derived fromoperations,including interest cash flows associated with notes payable,beforerealized investment gains and losses fromsecuritiestransactions,impairments, derivative and hedging activities,and other nonrecurring items÷average shareholder’s equity, excluding unrealized gains/losses from investments and derivatives

OROE growth is computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the prior year for earnings. For the average shareholder’s equity, we adjust the ending equity balance to the prior year-end spot yen/dollar exchange rate. The combination of these adjustments to both components of this measure effectively eliminates fluctuations from currency rates on operating earnings, which can magnify or suppress reported results in dollar terms.

The Japan Solvency Margin Ratio (“SMR”)is a metric associated with our regulatory reporting to the Financial Services Agency in Japan. SMR measures an insurance company’s ability to satisfy policy obligations. A strong SMR serves to protect our policyholders’ interests, while also improving our flexibility to invest in additional asset classes, with the objective of enhancing risk-adjusted investment returns and returning capital to our shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends. The SMR is an important financial indicator and key benchmark for industry regulators. Maintaining a strong capital position has been a long-standing priority. Aflac’s SMR remains high, and was 945% at the end of 2016, compared to 828% at the end of 2015.

Net Investment Incomeemphasizes that each NEO is responsible for maximizing the Company’s risk-adjusted performance subject to our liability profile and capital requirements.

U.S. and Japanese segments

For both the U.S. and Japanese segments, we use a metric referred to as the increase in total new annualized premiums (on policies sold and converted) during the reporting period. Both segments’ MIP metrics include the percentage increase in Direct Premiums and the percentage increase in Pretax Operating Earnings. We defineDirect Premiumsas the insurance premium earned by the segment during the period, prior to any reinsurance ceded or assumed. We definePretax Operating Earningson a segment basis as the operating profit before realized investment gains and losses from securities transactions, impairments, and derivative and hedging activities, as well as nonrecurring items. The percentage increase in Pretax Operating Earnings for the Japan segment is also measured before expenses allocated from the U.S., and excludes foreign currency effect.

TARGET SETTING CONSIDERATION

In addition to currency neutrality, the Compensation Committee considers the current business operating environment and forecasts emerging from the strategic planning process when setting MIP objectives for each metric. For example, new product launches and distribution expansion can materially affect the Company’s results from one year to the next. Aflac Japan launched a major cancer product, New Cancer Days, at the end of 2014, and its strong sales momentum carried into 2015. Aflac Japan also launched its EVER medical insurance in June 2015. Over this same timeframe, Aflac Japan continued to deepen and expand its relationship with Japan Post Holdings.

It was also anticipated that low interest rates, especially in Japan, would continue in 2016. This expectation was reinforced on January 29, 2016, when the Bank of Japan announced a negative interest rate policy, which exacerbated problems faced by insurance companies in Japan, especially in regard to finding yen-denominated assets to match against longer duration liabilities. The low rate environment would continue to pressure Aflac Japan’s net investment income as private placement investments were called or matured. Furthermore, the Company planned in 2016 to actively manage down sales of first sector savings products, which have returns that are more interest rate sensitive. As such, the difficult sales comparison produced by the successful product launches and enhanced distribution in 2015, combined with the anticipated effects of de-emphasizing first sector products in 2016, led the Compensation Committee to identify that a lower third sector new annualized premium target was justified for 2016.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

35

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Operating earnings per diluted share excluding foreign currency effect rose 7.5% in 2015, presenting a challenging comparison for 2016. Aflac Japan earnings are impacted by the low rate environment and an expected premium decline from the Company’s tactical decision to de-emphasize first sector savings products. For Aflac U.S., expense ratios were expected to increase modestly in 2016 as a result of investment in overall IT, group product administration and everwell platforms. This combination of natural sales patterns in Japan, the low rate environment’s impact on net investment income, and increased investment in the business led to modestly lowered consolidated profitability targets for 2016.

TARGET BONUS OPPORTUNITY

Target bonuses for 2016 for the NEOs, which were determined to be competitive relative to comparable positions within our peer group, were as follows:

Named Executive Officer

Target MIP

(as percent of base salary)

Daniel P. Amos220%
Frederick J. Crawford125%
Kriss Cloninger III150%
Paul S. Amos II125%
Eric M. Kirsch200%

The MIP opportunities for all NEOs are capped at 200% of their target opportunities.

WEIGHTINGS OF EACH PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE FOR 2016

The performance measures are weighted differently for each NEO and for all other officer levels in the Company. We vary the weightings to reflect how each position can and should influence the outcome of particular metrics.

 Weightings of Annual Incentive Metrics as a Percent of Target
 Daniel P. Amos     Frederick J. Crawford    ��Kriss Cloninger III      Paul S. Amos II          Eric M. Kirsch

Corporate Objectives:

Operating earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the Company (excluding foreign currency effect)

22.73%24.00%22.67%24.00%30.00%
OROE (excluding foreign currency effect)11.36%8.80%9.33%8.00%15.00%
SMR11.36%8.80%9.33%8.00%15.00%
Net Investment Income excluding hedge costs (Consolidated)9.10%8.00%8.67%8.00%30.00%
Subtotal Aflac Incorporated54.55%49.60%50.00%48.00%90.00%

U.S. Segment:

New Annualized Premium

6.81%5.20%5.33%
Direct Premiums4.55%5.20%5.33%
Pretax Operating Earnings4.55%5.60%6.01%8.00%
Subtotal15.91%16.00%16.67%8.00%

Japan Segment:

New Annualized Premium (third sector sales)

11.36%10.40%10.00%16.00%
Direct Premiums9.09%10.40%10.00%8.00%
Pretax Operating Earnings9.09%13.60%13.33%20.00%
Subtotal29.54%34.40%33.33%44.00%

Global Investments:

Credit Losses/Impairments

10.00%
Subtotal10.00%
GRAND TOTAL100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%

Metric       Compensation Rationale       Weighting
     Daniel P.
Amos
     Frederick J.
Crawford
     Eric M.
Kirsch
     Charles D.
Lake II
     Masatoshi
Koide
Corporate Objective

Adjusted earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the Company (excluding foreign currency effect)

This is calculated as:

Adjusted earnings, excluding the impact of foreign currency* ÷ Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

Growth in adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding the impact of foreign currency, is computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the prior year, which eliminates fluctuations from currency rates that can magnify or suppress reported results in dollar terms.45.45%41.60%22.50%24.00%29.57%
Subtotal45.45%41.60%22.50%24.00%29.57%

U.S. Segment

New Annualized Premium (increase over 2018)

 

New annualized premium is policies sold and converted during the reporting period.9.09%8.00%2.50%

Earned Premium (increase over 2018)

9.09%8.00%2.50%
Subtotal18.18%16.00%5.00%
Japan Segment
New Annualized Premium (third sector and first sector protection sales)Focuses on maintaining our leadership position in cancer and medical (third sector) insurance while also offering first sector protection products. Both third sector and first sector protection products are less interest-rate sensitive than savings-type products and have strong and stable margins.13.64%17.20%3.75%32.00%25.22%
 
Earned Premium (increase in third sector and first sector protection sales)13.64%17.20%3.75%32.00%14.78%
Pretax Adjusted Earnings (increase over 2018)30.43%
Subtotal27.28%34.40%7.50%64.00%70.43%
Global Investments
Net Investment Income (U.S. and Japan GAAP Segments only)Recognizes the need to responsibly invest the premium and other cash flows to maximize the risk-adjusted performance of our portfolio, subject to our liability profile and capital requirements.9.09%8.00%45.00%12.00%
 
Credit Losses/Impairments20.00%
Subtotal9.09%8.00%65.00%12.00%
Total100%100%100%100%100%
36*

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Adjusted earnings, excluding the impact of foreign currency, is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. See the Appendix to this Proxy Statement for a definition for this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

2020 Proxy Statement       37


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

20162019 MIP TARGETS AND ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

Corporate Metric

Adjusted earnings per share on a currency-neutral basis for the full year came in at $4.42 per share, at the upper end of our upwardly revised guidance range of $4.35 to $4.45 per share. Adjusted earnings reflect stronger than expected net investment income, especially in Japan, and lower expenses.

U.S. Segment Metrics

Aflac U.S. sales and U.S. earned premium decreased 1.3% and 1.8%, respectively, in 2019, which resulted in zero MIP payout for these metrics. Sales below the target range and higher than anticipated lapse rates have led to earned premium growth below the bottom of the range. Results partially reflect a decline in recruiting and retention of commission-only agents in a strong economic environment.

Japan Segment Metrics

Aflac Japan’s sales decreased in 2019 primarily due to the impact of lower Japan Post sales following the very successful cancer insurance launch in the 2ndquarter of 2018. Results reflect a sharp decline in the sale of cancer products after Japan Post Group announced an internal investigation into the sale of insurance products through Japan Post Co., Ltd. and Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. While the investigation and eventual suspension of sale of Japan Post Insurance products did not involve the sale of Aflac Japan cancer policies, the events had a negative impact on cancer sales in the postal network. While non-Japan Post channels have performed as planned for the year, our other distribution channels did not fully offset the decline in Japan Post group sales. However, Japan third sector and first sector protection earned premium remained on track and increased 1.3%, in line with our expectations.

Global Investments Metrics

In 2019, interest rates fell in both Japan and the U.S., including the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), U.S. Treasury rates, and Japanese Government Bond rates. The higher allocation and accelerated investment in dollar-denominated floating rate and alternative assets for both Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. helped drive net investment income for the year. Pretax variable investment income for the full year was $32 million, of which $21 million was above the target for 2019. Hedge costs for Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar portfolio for the full year were $257 million, 8.9% higher than the prior year but favorable to target for 2019. Overall credit conditions and asset quality remained strong for the year and allowed us to do some targeted de-risking across the portfolio. This included reducing our exposure to public equity markets.

Please refer to the 2019 Business Overview section beginning on page 29 for additional information.

38       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Actual performance relative to 2019 MIP targets was determined after the end of the year and presented to the Compensation Committee for discussion and approval at its February 20172020 meeting. The following table shows the corporate and business segment metrics, objectives, and results for the 20162019 MIP awards.

 Minimum GoalTarget GoalMaximum Goal2016 Actual2016 Payout
Percentages

Corporate Metrics:

Operating earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the Company (excluding foreign currency effect)*

$6.17$6.29$6.41$6.45200%
OROE (excluding foreign currency effect)17%19.5%22%17.3%56%
SMR500%600%700%945%200%
Net Investment Income excluding hedge costs (Consolidated)Budget
minus 2%
BudgetBudget
plus 2.25%
Budget
plus 0.91%
140.42%

U.S. Segment Metrics:

Increase in New Annualized Premiums

3.00%4.00%5.00%-.34%
Increase in Direct Premiums1.50%2.25%3.00%2.08%88.39%
Increase in Pretax Operating Earnings1.00%3.00%5.00%9.67%200%
Japan Segment Metrics:
New Annualized Premiums
(third sector sales) (billions)
¥74.22¥75.84¥77.45¥83.99200%
Increase in Direct Premiums0.25%0.75%1.25%.96%141.51%
Increase in Pretax Operating Earnings before allocated expenses and foreign currency change-4.00%-3.25%-2.00%-2.02%198.56%

Global Investments Metrics (Eric M. Kirsch only):

Credit Losses/Impairments (in millions)

($465)($315)($165)($97)200%
*CorrespondsMinimum
Goal
Target
Goal
Maximum
Goal
2019 Payout
Percentages vs
Target

Corporate Metric:
Adjusted earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the Company (excluding foreign currency effect)(1)(2)

200%

U.S. Segment Metrics:
Increase in New Annualized Premium

0%
Increase in Earned Premium0%

Japan Segment Metrics:
Increase in New Annualized Premium in billions of Yen
(third sector and first sector protection sales)

0%

Increase in Earned Premium
(third sector and first sector protection sales)

136.07%

Increase in Pretax Adjusted Earnings(2)

181.92%

Global Investments Metrics:
Net Investment Income
(U.S. and Japan GAAP segments only)(3)

191.57%

Credit Losses/Impairments (in millions)(4)

200%
(1)The target corresponds to ana .96% increase from the 2018 base of a minimum goal$4.16 per diluted share (net of .2%, a target goalforeign currency effect).
(2)In February 2020, the Compensation Committee excluded net make-whole income over $15 million (exclusion of 2%,$11 million) and a maximum goalthe accretion from previously impaired securities totaling approximately $14 million. This change was made due to net make-whole income was much higher than anticipated, and for the change in accounting for the accretion from previously impaired securities. This change had no impact on the Adjusted Earnings Per Share payout. For Japan Pretax Adjusted Earnings, the payout percentage for prepaid tax adjusted earnings would have been 200% without this exclusion.
(3)Excludes Aflac Incorporated portfolio income, alternative investments (externally managed private equity and real estate equity). Net make-whole income is included but capped at $15 million (security specific make-whole income less lost NII on reinvestment). Adjusted for any corporate shift in USD hedging strategy. In February 2020, the Compensation Committee also excluded accretion from previously impaired securities totaling approximately $14 million. The payout percentage would have been 200% without this exclusion.
(4)This measure excludes realized losses on securities sold for pre-approved tax purposes, Japan principal reserve matching and segregated portfolio asset liability management, corporate shift in RBC drawdown plan, switch trades in excess of 4% from a 2015 base or $6.16 per share.$100 million in assets, and compliance with internal risk limits. Excludes accounting policy driven mark-to-market losses on equities, alternatives, and perpetual securities.

Please refer to the 2016 Business Overview section on page 31 for additional information.2020 Proxy Statement       39


Table of Contents

2016Executive Compensation

2019 MIP PAYOUTS

The following table below reflects target and earned percentages of salary for each NEO for the MIP based on 20162019 performance results.

 As a % of base salary
NEOTargetEarned
Daniel P. Amos220%339%
Frederick J. Crawford125%200%
Kriss Cloninger III150%238%
Paul S. Amos II125%223%
Eric M. Kirsch200%321%

The Compensation Committee has the discretion in certain limited circumstances to adjust the MIP results related to particular performance measures if the Committee determines that a class of MIP participants would be unduly penalized or rewarded because a payout is incompatible with the performance measure. There were no adjustments to the NEOs’ MIP payouts for 2016.2019, and these awards were paid in February 2020.

As a % of
base salary
NEO     Target     Earned
Daniel P. Amos220%279%
Frederick J. Crawford125%152%
Eric M. Kirsch200%353%
Charles D. Lake II100%115%
Masatoshi Koide115%135%

For additional information about the MIP, please refer to the 20162019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below, which shows the threshold, target, and maximum award amounts payable under the MIP for 2016,2019, and the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table, which shows the actual amount of non-equity incentive plan compensation paid to the NEOs for 2016.2019.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

37

Table of ContentsLong-Term Incentives

Compensation Discussion & AnalysisOVERVIEW OF LTI PROGRAM|CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

Long-term Equity Incentives

The CEO and President’s long-term equity incentives are addressed inCompensation Committee administers the next section; this section pertains onlyLong-Term Incentive Plan. In February 2019, the Compensation Committee authorized grants of LTI awards to the other NEOs.

In 2016, executive officers, including the NEOs, received LTI awards in the form of PBRS, and allPBRS. All eligible non-executive officers received time-based restricted stock options. Forunits.

In determining the number of shares of PBRS to be granted to NEOs, the target amount of each awardCompensation Committee is competitively positioned relative to awards foradvised by its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee’s decision is informed by market data regarding comparable executives at our peersexecutive positions within the Company’s peer group and in the broader insurance sector. The targeted LTI mix for 2016 forsector, and each NEO’s tenure and performance. Based on these considerations, the NEOs was 80% PBRSCommittee determines award levels that it believes are competitive within the Company’s peer group and 20% stock options. These stock options have an exercise price basedthe broader insurance sector, generally targeting the market median, and will be effective at aligning the NEO’s compensation with performance and the interests of our shareholders. Future payouts (if any) on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and a three-year vesting period.

LTI targets as a percent of base salary for the NEOs were as follows:

NEO

Target LTI

(as Percent of Base Salary)

Frederick J. Crawford200%
Paul S. Amos II200%
Eric M. Kirsch200%

February 2019 PBRS awards will be lower thanbased on the Company’s performance from 2019 through 2021 and will vary between 0% and 200% of the target or reduced to zero if management fails to maintain appropriate risk-based capital levels, as specified below. Additionally, the valuenumber of existing awards and other shares held by our executives likely would decline, providing strong economic incentive to manage capital and risk. Options only provide value if our share price appreciates and the options vest,of PBRS granted, which alignsis consistent with the long-term interests of shareholders.typical market practices.

The performance period for PBRS awards granted in 2016 is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2018. TheLTI awards will vest three years from the issuance date, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions and final Compensation Committee authorization.

TARGET LTI AWARDS

The pay program for the CEO follows a market-based approach. The Company granted the CEO his target annual LTI award in February 2019 at a market-competitive level, based primarily on peer market data. Specifically, the CEO’s target LTI was set at an amount that approximates the 50th percentile LTI of his fellow CEOs at the Company’s peers for 2019. This resulted in the CEO’s target LTI being 557% of his base salary.

2019 annual LTI award targets as a percent of base salary for the other NEOs were as shown below:

NEOTarget LTI (as percent
of base salary)
Frederick J. Crawford250%
Eric M. Kirsch200%
Charles D. Lake II200%
Masatoshi Koide200%

40       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

LTI PERFORMANCE METRICS

The PBRS will vest based on the Company’s achievement on three measures—AROE, RBC, and SMR—for the cumulative three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2021. As described below, each metric has been assigned a weight that determines its effect on the LTI payout. Once a payout is calculated based on the weighted average achievement on these three metrics, that amount will be modified (up to +/-20%) based on our total shareholder return relative to the members of our peer group. We refer to this fourth metric as relative total shareholder return, or RTSR.

As noted in the descriptions below, in designing the LTI program, the Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of maximizing profitability and return on equity to shareholders, but also believes it is appropriate to pursue those objectives within the context of a solid risk framework.

MetricCompensation Committee RationaleWeighting

Adjusted Return on Shareholders’ Equity (AROE)

We define AROE (or currency neutral AROE) as:

Adjusted Earnings, excluding the impact of foreign currency ÷ Adjusted Book Value*

Enables shareholders to evaluate our financial achievements relative to other organizations in terms of how effectively we use capital to generate earnings
We believe this metric has a significant influence on the value our shareholders place on the Company.
70%
Risk-Based Capital (RBC)

Capital adequacy is a significant concern for the financial markets and shareholder confidence.
Current regulatory solvency measure in the U.S.
15%
Solvency Margin Ratio (SMR)

Capital Adequacy is a significant concern for the financial markets and shareholder confidence.
Principal capital adequacy measure in Japan
15%
Total Shareholder Return Relative to Peer Group (RTSR)
Align LTI payouts with relative performance to peer group
Modifier
(up to ± 20%)
*AROE, adjusted earnings, excluding the impact of foreign currency, and adjusted book value are not calculated in accordance with GAAP. See the Appendix to this Proxy Statement for definitions for these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

2019 LTI PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The following illustrates the terms of the 2019 PBRS grant.

201920202021Payout
2022

Performance
Level
 3-yr. avg.
currency-
neutral
AROE goal
 3-yr. avg.
SMR goal
 3-yr. avg.
RBC goal
 Payout
(% of Target)
3-yr.
RTSR
percentile
rank vs. peers
    Modifier to
earned
amounts
Maximum    16.5%    700%    500%    200%75th
percentile
or greater
 1.20x
Target 14% 600% 400% 100%×Between
25th and 75th
percentile
 1.00x
Threshold 12.5% 500% 350% 50%25th
percentile
or worse
 0.80x

For financial performance (AROE, SMR, and RBC), linear interpolation will be used to determine payouts for performance between the corresponding goals (i.e., threshold to target, or target to maximum).
For RTSR, adjustments of 1.20x or 0.80x will be made only if the Company’s RTSR is in the upper or lower quartile, respectively, versus our peers. There will not be any adjustments to the payout if RTSR falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles of the peers.
Maximum potential payouts will be capped at 200% of target.

The goals for these metrics are generally consistent with the Company’s public guidance as provided during the annual December Outlook Call.

2020 Proxy Statement       41


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2017-2019 Performance Period

In February 2020, the NEOs except for Mr. Koide received payouts with respect to the performance shares that were granted in February 2017 for the three year-performance period ended December 31, 2019. Mr. Koide did not receive any performance shares in 2017. These awards were paid at 200% times the target number of shares initially awarded based on the three-year average results for each of the currency neutral AROE, SMR, and RBC metrics. Earned amounts were modified based on the Company’s TSR performance relative to our peers.

GOALS (3-year average)RELATIVE TSR
(RTSR) MODIFIER
50%
CURRENCY-
NEUTRAL AROE*
RESULT
15%
(50% * 134.8%)
+25%
SMR RESULT
624%
(25% * 200%)
+25%
RBC RESULT
1,024%
(25% * 200%)
×RTSR
MODIFIER
1.2
=PAYOUT
201%

(Maximum
payout 200%)
*The performance metric operating return on equity (“OROE”), excluding the impact of foreign currency, was renamed in 2018 to AROE (calculation has not changed).

The final shares awarded, excluding dividends, to the NEOs in February 2020 for the 2017 to 2019 performance period were:

NEOTarget Number
of Shares Awarded
Actual number of
Shares Awarded 
Daniel P. Amos
Frederick J. Crawford
Eric M. Kirsch
Charles D. Lake II
Masatoshi KoideN/AN/A 

SPECIAL AWARDS

From time to time, we may make special awards in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to recognize major milestones, to secure leadership stability, or to achieve other strategic objectives. On November 12, 2019, the Compensation Committee awarded an RSU grant to Mr. Crawford received a one-time discretionary award of 4,104 PBRS to recognize superior performance thathis impending promotion to President, Chief Operating Officer, which became effective January 1, 2020. The grant will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date ifgenerally subject to continued service through the related performance metrics are met. The sole performance measure for determining vesting for PBRS awards to NEOs is the achievement of specified RBC ratios as determined on a U.S. statutory accounting basis. This performance measure was selected becausedate. On February 14, 2019, the Compensation Committee believes that capital adequacy is a significant concernawarded RSU grants to Messrs. Lake and Koide for their roles in origination, extensive negotiations, relationship management and overall leadership in securing the Japan Post Holdings alliance. Messrs. Lake’s and Koide’s grants will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date generally subject to continued service through the vesting date; an additional vesting condition requiring regulatory approval for the financial markets and shareholder confidence. The RBC demonstrates Aflac’s achievement in managingJapan Post Holdings alliance was achieved. For more information regarding the capital level ofspecial awards see the consolidated insurance operations of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. as reported to U.S. regulatory authorities. This capital measure reflects the Company’s ability to both satisfy its obligations to policyholders and generate returns for shareholders.

The final three-year PBRS award percentage will reflect the three-year average RBC (2016 to 2018).

For the three-year period, performance shares will vest as follows:

 Threshold GoalTarget GoalMaximum Goal
Average Risk-Based Capital Ratio500%700%700%
Vesting Percentage50%100%100%

If the average RBC falls below 500%, there will be no vesting for the period. Vesting will be determined using linear interpolation for an average RBC ratio between 500% and 700%. If the average RBC equals or exceeds 700%, vesting will be equal to 100%.

CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

The Compensation Committee’s longstanding process for reviewing and determining the CEO’s pay involves a rigorous pay-for-performance approach that creates a direct link between the Company’s comparative performance results and CEO compensation. To achieve this linkage, the compensation consultant annually calculates the Company’s composite performance percentile rank for a variety of metrics among our peer group.

Starting in 2015, the Company’s President was placed under a similar program for his long-term incentive compensation. Based on market analyses, and also considering the unique role held by Mr. Cloninger as of the start of 2015 (he was President, CFO, and Treasurer at the time), the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Cloninger’s final 2016 pay package would be set at 55% of the CEO’s pay package. Mr. Cloninger’s 2016 long-term incentive pay is 100% performance-based, as it is a function of the CEO’s pay, which is determined based on the Company’s relative financial and total shareholder return (TSR) performance against our peers.

38

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

Timing and Key Features of the Program

The process used to determine the CEO’s and President’s total direct compensation in 2016 is shown in the following chart:

Long-term Equity Incentive (LTI) Award

The Compensation Committee’s process for making PBRS grants to the CEO and the President is summarized below.

Each of these steps, and the corresponding action for 2016, is summarized on the following pages.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

39

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

STEP 1

CONTINGENT PBRS GRANT BASED ON PRIOR YEAR’S PERFORMANCE

In this step, the Compensation Committee determines the February LTI award for the CEO and President. The contingent award was equal to 100% of the prior year’s total LTI grant date award value. The contingent grant for 2016 totaled 80,075 shares for the CEO and 50,055 shares for the President. See “20162019 Grants of Plan-based Awards”Plan-Based Awards table for additional information.

STEP 2

DETERMINE THE COMPANY’S RELATIVE FINANCIAL AND TSR PERFORMANCE

At the end of the calendar year, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s actual results for the year using the following metrics to determine the final total PBRS grants for the CEO and the President.

Relative financial performance(total weight: 56%), measured by:
·Revenue growth·Return on revenues
·Net income growth·Return on average equity
·Premium income growth·Return on average assets
·EPS growth

Relative TSR performance(total weight: 44%),measured by:
·1-year TSR
·3-year TSR

2016 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RANKING MATRIX: AFLAC INCORPORATED RELATIVE RANKING AMONG PEER GROUP

Aflac Incorporated

Relative Ranking

(out of 18

companies)

Weightings(4)   Totals
Revenue 1-Year Growth(1)919
Net Income 1-Year Growth(1)616
Premium Income 1-Year Growth(1)11111
EPS 1-Year Growth(1)515
Return on Revenues 2016(1)122
Return on Average Equity 2016(2)326
Return on Average Assets 2016(2)7214

1-Year Indexed TSR

(12/31/15—12/31/16)(3)

7428

3-Year Indexed TSR

(12/31/13—12/31/16)(3)

16464
Composite Score145
Performance Rank5

The Company's rank in comparison to our peer group on each of these metrics is shown in the table to the left. The lower the total weighted composite score, the higher a company's overall ranking.

Based upon an analysis of the Company's relative financial performance and TSR, the Company ranked 5. The Company's performance rank significantly improved compared to the prior year's assessment of relative performance when the Company ranked 10 out of 18 companies.

(1) For the trailing twelve months ending September 30, 2016.

(2) As of September 30, 2016.

(3) As of December 31, 2016, when data was compiled for the performance review by the Compensation Committee.

(4) A weighting of "1" means the related metric is worth approximately 5.56% of the total score, and a weighting of "4" means a worth of approximately 22.22% of the total.

STEP 3

ASSESS CEO COMPENSATION AT PEER COMPANIES

In conjunction with the relative performance assessment, the Compensation Committee evaluates total compensation levels for the CEO relative to the peer group with the help of the compensation consultant. The highest and lowest paid CEOs among the peers are removed from the data set to mitigate the effect of the outliers.

STEP 4

CALCULATE TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION FOR THE CEO BASED UPON THE COMPANY'S PERFORMANCE PERCENTILE RANKING VERSUS PEERS

The Company's relative performance percentile ranking (for 2016, 5 out of 18, or 77th percentile ranking) is applied to the peer CEO compensation data compiled in Step 3 for the applicable year to derive an implied total compensation amount for the Company's CEO.

40

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

STEP 5

DETERMINE CEO’S FINAL PBRS GRANT AND ADJUST CONTINGENT PBRS TO REFLECT ACTUAL RELATIVE PERFORMANCE RANKING

The resulting implied compensation level determined in Step 4 was used to determine the CEO’s PBRS grant for 2016. The contingent grant to the CEO in February 2016 was trued-up as of December 31, 2016. Together with base salary and MIP, the final PBRS grant aligns the CEO’s total direct compensation with the Company’s relative performance versus the peer group.

STEP 6

DETERMINE PRESIDENT’S FINAL PBRS GRANT

Once the CEO’s compensation package is determined, the President’s compensation package is fixed at 55% of that amount. The resulting implied compensation level was used in determining the President’s PBRS grant for 2016.

ENDING GRANT RESULT
For 2016, the above-described process resulted in the CEO receiving a true-up of 131,246 shares of PBRS, and the President receiving a true-up of 70,010 shares of PBRS. See “2016 Grants of Plan-based Awards” table for additional information.

Contingent Vesting of PBRS Grants

In addition to having to earn the PBRS grant amount based upon the Company’s relative financial and TSR performance, the 2016 grant of PBRS is not guaranteed; vesting is contingent upon the Company achieving the three-year RBC performance thresholds discussed under “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program–Long-term Equity Incentives” on page 38. Thus, unlike many companies where an LTI award need only be earned once, the CEO’s and President’s LTI awards must be earned twice:

lTotal grant for the year is based upon relative financial performance (56% weighting) and relative TSR performance (44% weighting) for the current year, and
lThe grant operates like the PBRS program for other NEOs (based on future performance against a pre-established, Compensation Committee-approved metric and performance level).

As a result, we believe our approach to these two senior executives’ LTI grants, and the overall compensation packages awarded these individuals, reflects the Company’s continuing strong commitment to pay for performance.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

41

Table of Contents

48.

Program Changes for 2017Other Compensation

Overview and Context

As discussed in the “Response to Say-on-Pay Vote” section above, we continually analyze our compensation program to ensure that we remain current in our approaches, a leader in executive compensation best practices, and cognizant of shareholder concerns. The feedback from these conversations, together with a thorough analysis of best practices and guidance from our compensation consultant, was incorporated into the Compensation Committee’s regular review of our compensation practices.

For 2017, we believed it was necessary to modify the metrics used in our incentive compensation programs due to the following internal and external factors affecting our business as more fully discussed in Item 1A of the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K:

lBegan conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary;
lInclusion of Japan’s U.S. dollar investment portfolio hedge costs in Operating Earnings and its impact on New Investment Income; and
lThe Bank of Japan’s 2016 announced negative rate policy resulting in a low interest rate environment and the Company’s strategic decision to de-emphasize yen-based retirement products in Japan.

In addition, we thoughtfully considered feedback received during our shareholder outreach efforts when making the following changes to our 2017 executive compensation program.

MIP Changes

For 2017, we have made the following modifications to our MIP:

lSegment pre-tax earnings were removed as MIP metrics for NEOs given that operating earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the Company (excluding foreign currency effect) is already included in the MIP as a corporate metric with material weighting;
lOROE and SMR were removed from the MIP and incorporated as metrics under our PBRS awards under the LTI program in order to better align the metrics under our PBRS program with the Company’s strategic and operational goals;
lThe Japan segment includes third sector premium in place of total premium as we focus on third sector business in response to the Bank of Japan’s negative rate policy; and
lThe slope of the MIP payout curve was adjusted such that the required above-target performance to achieve maximum payouts will now be greater.

LTI Program Changes

CEO AND PRESIDENT LTI PROGRAM CHANGES

The Compensation Committee has approved a new structure to transition the CEO’s annual LTI grants from the historic pay ranking-performance matrix approach (which was applicable to 2016 grants) to a more typical market-based approach. Beginning in 2017, the CEO’s LTI grant will have the following attributes:

lAnnual LTI grants will continue to be made 100% in PBRS with terms described in the following section; and
lThe entire target annual LTI award will be granted in February at a market-competitive level based on peer market data.

Our shareholder outreach identified some shareholder concern about the absence of an LTI target and maximum for the CEO. With these LTIP program changes, the CEO’s grant will have a target and a maximum payout. The 2017 target LTI grant for the CEO is approximately $8.4 million.

Mr. Cloninger will not receive any LTI grants in 2017 due to his planned retirement at the end of 2017.

PBRS DESIGN

For 2017, our PBRS grants for executives – including our CEO – are different in the following respects. Specifically, we:

lIncorporated additional metrics (OROE and SMR) that better reflect our long-term business strategy and operating environment;
lAdded upside performance/payout leverage;
lAdded a relative TSR (RTSR) modifier; and
lModified the OROE definition to include hedge costs and exclude unrealized gains and (losses) on foreign currency translation from shareholders’ equity.

42

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Retirement, Deferral, and Savings Plans

The following illustrates the terms of the 2017 PBRS grant.

lFor financial performance (OROE, SMR, and RBC), linear interpolation will be used to determine payouts for performance between the corresponding goals (i.e., threshold to target, or target to maximum)
lFor RTSR, adjustments of 1.20x or 0.80x would be made only if the Company’s RTSR is in the upper or lower quartile, respectively, versus its peers; no adjustments to amounts earned pursuant to the Company’s financial performance will be made for RTSR performance falling between the 25th and 75th percentiles of the peers
lOverall, maximum potential payouts will be capped at 200% of target

RBC thresholds were adjusted down modestly to reflect the eventual draw-down of excess capital in the U.S. as a result of our Japan branch conversion. Overall, we believe that these changes for 2017 further enhance our long-standing strong pay-for-performance philosophy, while also being responsive to the business and talent markets in which we compete.

Retirement, Deferral, and Savings Plans

The retirement, deferral, and savings plans described below were established in order to provide competitive post-termination benefits for officers and employees, including the NEOs, in recognition of their service and contributions to the Company.

42       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

As described further in “Pension Benefits” below, the Company maintains tax-qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all U.S. employees, including the NEOs, who satisfy the eligibility requirements. Mr. Lake, a former U.S. employee who became a Japan employee on August 1, 2013, has benefits accrued in the U.S. tax-qualified plan from his 14 years as a U.S. employee. The Company also maintains nonqualified supplemental retirement plans covering some of the NEOs. No change has been made to the pension plans and the benefit level remains the same as it was last year. Messrs. Lake and Koide currently participate in a Japan nonqualified supplemental retirement plan, which is described on page 51.

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

The NEOs (other than Messrs. Lake and Koide), together with other U.S.-based eligible executives, are entitled to participate in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”). Mr. Daniel P.Messrs. Amos and Mr. Crawford are the only NEOs currently participating in this plan. Mr. Lake has funds in the plan from his 14 years as a U.S. employee, but he no longer actively participates in the plan. The EDCP is discussed in more detail below under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

43

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Additional Executive Compensation Practices and Procedures

401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan

The Company maintains a tax qualifiedtax-qualified 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) in which all U.S.-based employees, including the U.S.-based NEOs, are eligible to participate underon the same terms. The Company will match 50%provides matching contributions to 100% of each employee’s contributions up to 4% of the first 6% of eligible compensation that is contributed to the 401(k) Plan.employee’s annual cash compensation. Employee contributions made to the 401(k) Plan are 100% vested.

The Company provides a nonelective contribution to the 401(k) Plan of 2% of annual cash compensation for employees who elected to opt out of the future benefits of the U.S. defined benefit plan and for U.S. employees who started working for the Company after September 30, 2013, the date on which the U.S. defined benefit plan was frozen with respect to new participants. Mr. Crawford is the only NEO who is eligible to receive a nonelective contribution.

Employees vest in employerCompany contributions at the rate of 20% for each complete year of service. After five years of service, employees are fully vested in all employerCompany contributions.

Other Benefits

The Company provides NEOs with other benefits that we believe are reasonable, competitive, and consistent with our overall executive compensation program. For details, see the “All Other Compensation” column in the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table on page 47.46. Included in Mr. Lake’s employment agreement are certain perquisites including tax equalization between the U.S. and Japan on unvested earnings distributed after August 1, 2013, upon becoming an Aflac Japan employee, payment of premiums for a life insurance policy for $10 million (including tax gross-up) and tax consultant fees. The Company also pays for Messrs. Lake’s and Koide’s use of a leased car, driver compensation and related expenses, which are customary perquisites for senior executives at Aflac Japan.

The Company maintains medical and dental insurance, group life insurance, accidental death insurance, cancer insurance, and disability insurance programs for all of its employees, as well as paid time off, leave of absence, and other similar policies. The U.S.-based NEOs and other officers are eligible to participate in these programs along with, and on the same basis as, the Company’s other salaried employees. In addition, the NEOs are eligible to receive reimbursement for medical examination expenses.

For security and time managementtime-management reasons, certain officers of the Company occasionally travel on corporate aircraft for business and personal purposes. Personal travel on corporate aircraft and security services are provided where considered by the Board of Directors to be in the best interest of the Company and its business objectives.

2020 Proxy Statement       43


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Additional Executive Compensation PracticesPlan Practice and Procedures

Equity Granting Policies

Each year, the Compensation Committee meets shortly after the Company’s fiscal year results are released to the public. Based on recommendations developed by the CEO, President, and CFO with input from Mercer, stock options, PBRS and time-based restricted stock awards are submitted to the Compensation Committee for approval at its February meetings. Option grants are awarded on the date of the meeting, and have a per share exercise price set at the closing price on the date of grant. The Company has never engaged in “backdating” of options.

The Company may periodically make additional equity grants during the course of the year. However, it is the Company’s policy not to make any equity grants in advance of material news releases. As detailed in the section labeled “CEO and President Compensation and Pay for Performance,” the Company adjusted the amount of equity compensation granted to the CEO and President in December 2016 based on the Company’s performance relative to peers in 2016.

Stock Ownership Guidelines; Hedging and Pledging Restrictions

The Company believes its executive officers and Directors should have a significant equity interest in the Company and has enforced stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-employee Directors for almost two decades. The current stock ownership guidelines, as amended on February 14, 2019, are as follows:

PositionOwnership guideline
Chairman of the Board/CEO President, and 8xbase salary
President of Aflac Incorporated5xbase salary
Chairman/Vice Chairman/President of Aflac U.S.4xbase salary
Chairman/Vice Chairman/President of Aflac Japan4xbase salary
All other executive officers3xbase salary
Non-employee Directors4xcash annual retainer

Officers have four years from date oftheir hire or promotion date to satisfy their respective stock ownership requirements. Non-employee Directors have five years from the date first elected to the Board to satisfy these requirements.

44

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table Upon any increase in these stock ownership guidelines or an increase in base salary or annual retainer, impacted individuals will have an additional two years from the effective date of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Additional Executive Compensation Practices and Proceduresthe change to comply with the increased requirements.

Ownership includes all shares held by the officer or Director and theirthe individual’s spouse, as well as tenure-based,time-based, unvested restricted shares. Shares pledged as collateral for a margin account or other loan, performance-based restricted shares,PBRS and stock options (vested or unvested) do not count toward these stock ownership guidelines.

Each current NEO and Director has stock ownership that exceeds the ownership guidelines or is working toward meeting the requisite guideline within the allowed four-year time frame. Progress toward meeting the guidelines is reviewed regularly and reported to the Board.

The Company’s insider trading policy prohibits our Directors, officers and other covered personsindividuals from sellingpurchasing financial instruments (including derivatives and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our Common Stock “short,” engaging in option trading (puts, calls,(collectively, “hedges”), or other derivative securities) relating to our Common Stock, entering into a 10b5-1 plan (unlessunless that plan is approved by the Compensation Committee), or hedging. Beginning in 2013, the Board adopted a policy prohibiting any further pledging of the Company’s stock byCommittee. In addition, executive officers and Directors.Directors are prohibited from pledging the Company’s stock. All other covered personsindividuals under the Company’s insider trading policy must pre-clear withobtain preapproval from the policy’s compliance officer before pledging Company stock as collateral for a margin account or other loan. The Company’s anti-hedging policy prohibits all other employees from engaging in hedges after February 13, 2020.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with the NEOs and certain other executives in key roles. The agreements generally address:address role and responsibility; rights to compensation and benefits during active employment; termination in the event of death, disability, or retirement; termination for cause or without cause; and resignation by the employee. Some agreements also contain termination and related pay provisions in the event of a change in control. These change-in-control provisions do not apply unless there is both a change in control and either a termination by the Company without cause or a resignation by the executive for good reason. This is commonly referred to as a “double trigger” requirement. No agreement provides for excise tax gross-ups. Further, the contracts stipulateeach agreement stipulates that the subject executive may not compete with the Company for a prescribed periodsperiod following termination of employment, or disclose confidential information.

Mr. Amos has voluntarily waived all “golden parachute” and other severance components in his employment agreement. The payments that may be made under each NEO’s employment agreement upon termination of employment under specified circumstances are described in more detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

44       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Change-in-Control Policy and Severance Agreements

The Company has no formal change in controlchange-in-control or severance policy. However, as noted above, individual employment agreements generally haveincorporate provisions related to these matters. These agreements provide no excise tax gross-ups.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

The Company has a “clawback” policy that allows itthe Compensation Committee to review any adjustment or restatement of performance measures and determine whether adjustmentsthat adjustment or recoveries ofrestatement warrants modifying or recovering non-equity incentives are necessary.incentive awards. If it is deemed that such an adjustmenta modification or recovery is appropriate, the Compensation Committee is charged with determining the amount of recovery and the proper officer group subject to any potential adjustments or recovery.be affected.

Certain Tax Implications of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits to $1 million annually the federal income tax deduction that a publicly held corporation may claim for compensation payable to certain of its current and former executive officers, but that deduction limitation historically did not apply to performance-based compensation that met certain requirements. As part of the U.S. Tax Reform, Section 162(m) was amended, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, to expand the range of executive officers subject to the deduction limitation and also to eliminate the exception for performance-based compensation—though the exception generally continues to be available on a “grandfathered” basis for compensation payable under a written binding contract in effect on and not materially modified after November 2, 2017.

In connection with making decisions ondetermining compensation for our executive compensation,officers, the Compensation Committee considers the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m),extent to which limits the Company’s ability to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, certain categories of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers. It is the Company’s policy to maximize the effectiveness of the compensation programs while also taking into considerationis deductible, including the requirementseffect of Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 162(m). The Company intends to maintain the flexibility to take actions that it deems to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly,In prior years, the Compensation Committee intendsgenerally sought to maintainstructure our executive incentive compensation awards to qualify as performance-based compensation exempt from the flexibilitySection 162(m) deduction limitation where doing so was consistent with the Company’s compensation objectives, but it reserved the right to implementaward nondeductible compensation, and on occasion did so. While the Compensation Committee continues to consider the effect of the Section 162(m) deduction limit when designing the Company’s compensation programs, the Compensation Committee’s primary focus in its compensation decisions will remain on most productively furthering the Company’s business objectives and not on whether the compensation is deductible. The Compensation Committee did not make significant changes to the Company’s executive compensation programs that it deems to beprogram for 2019 in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders, and it reserves the authority to award non-deductible compensation as it deems appropriate.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

45

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion & Analysis|Additional Executive Compensation Practices and Procedures

Long-term Incentive Fair Value Determinations

A challenging issue for publicly traded companies is how to value long-term incentive awards for grant purposes. Like many companies, we target and express such awards as a percent of salary. We also seek to balance the value of stock options with PBRS awarded to executive officers. Of particular concernresponse to the Company is how to calculate the value of a stock option.tax code changes.

The predominant model used to value stock options is the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. This model considers various assumptions for duration prior to exercise, risk-free interest rate, stock volatility, and employment termination rates. We segregate groups of option holders within the model by exercise patterns to better estimate the value of an option. For example, NEOs and executive officers typically hold their options much longer before exercising them than do non-officer employees.

In reality, the value assigned to long-term incentive awards changes each year as a result of fluctuations in the current market value of the Company’s Common Stock and changes in pricing assumptions. For example, when the share price goes up, so do the option grants’ fair value and their strike price, and the number of awarded shares equal to a designated dollar value decreases. Conversely, if the share price goes down, both the option’s fair value and its strike price go down, and the number of awarded shares increases. This result seems counterintuitive from a pay-for-performance perspective in that a lower stock price would lead to more options being granted at a lower price and a higher stock price would lead to fewer options being granted at a higher price.

Our solution, for grant purposes only, is to stabilize the deemed present value of a stock option for a three-year period. We think the use of such a value is more in line with creating long-term shareholder value and pay for performance, and allows us to better manage our burn rate (number of shares granted each year divided by the number of common shares outstanding) and budget the number of awarded shares over the life of the share authorization approved by shareholders.

For grants made in the three-year period of 2016 to 2018, our deemed fair value of a stock option is $6.95. However, the actual per-share exercise price under each option in any event is the closing price of a Common Stock share on the day the option is granted.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the preceding CD&A with management and, based on that review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors to include the CD&A in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee


Robert B. Johnson, Chairman

Douglas W. Johnson


Georgette D. Kiser
Joseph L. Moskowitz
Katherine T. Rohrer

2020 Proxy Statement       45


46

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2016EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

2019 Summary Compensation Tables

Table

The following table provides information concerning total compensation earned or paid for 2019 and, to the extent required by the SEC disclosure rules, 2018 and 2017 to our CEO, CFO, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers during 2016.2019. These five officers are referred to as our NEOs in this Proxy Statement.

Name and
Principal Position
Year

Salary
(1)

($)

Bonus
($)

Stock Awards

(2)(3)

($)

Option

Awards

(3)

($)

Non-equity

Incentive

Plan
Compensation

($)

Change in

Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred

  Compensation

Earnings

(4)

($)

All Other
  Compensation

(5)

($)

Total
($)
 

Total
without
Change in
Pension
Value*

($)

 Year Salary(1)
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards(2)(3)
($)
 Option
Awards(3)
($)
 Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(5)
($)
 Total
($)
 

Total
without
Change in
Pension
Value*

($)

Daniel P. Amos20161,441,10013,773,4664,884,442313,00220,412,010 20,412,01020191,441,1008,272,0624,002,594393,09614,108,85214,108,852
Chairman and CEO20151,441,1004,800,5565,509,362231,36511,982,383 11,982,383
20141,441,1002,141,1624,829,4156,835,154230,51715,477,348 8,642,194
Chairman, CEO20181,441,1008,922,1424,638,3452,166,871366,94017,535,39815,368,527
and President20171,441,1008,607,8895,946,7586,487,909347,32822,830,98416,343,075
Frederick J. Crawford2016700,0001,420,062280,0031,400,700454,6284,255,393 4,255,3932019725,0003,066,2651,104,981322,4465,218,6925,218,692
Executive Vice2015360,6061,240,000847,987211,994799,65247,3353,507,574 3,507,5742018725,0004,905,4531,391,688366,2147,388,3557,388,355
President, CFO2014 2017700,0002,793,7381,643,851390,9115,528,5005,528,500
Kriss Cloninger III2016975,0007,772,3822,321,529139,40911,208,320 11,208,320
President2015975,0003,017,2562,583,298278,335134,5386,988,427 6,710,092
2014975,0002,644,624661,1592,190,3042,329,649116,3598,917,095 6,587,446
Paul S. Amos II2016700,0001,120,019280,0031,564,0381,402,7591,579,3256,646,144 5,243,385
Eric M. Kirsch2019650,0001,338,5202,291,99580,56829,7294,390,8124,310,244
Executive Vice President,2018593,8002,248,5702,150,08722,82028,6205,043,8975,021,077
Global Chief Investment2017593,8001,217,2382,210,44247,01225,5924,094,0844,047,072
Officer; President, Aflac
Global Investments
Charles D. Lake II(6)2019605,1161,731,279693,04462,599869,2723,961,3103,898,711
President, Aflac2015677,9001,093,011257,1281,619,607716,2251,088,8915,452,762 4,736,5372018597,8801,237,224874,799282,725837,2303,829,8583,547,133
2014667,9001,655,800333,9481,238,5481,290,895982,5576,169,648 4,878,753
Eric M. Kirsch2016593,800950,052237,5191,906,40736,50517,2813,741,564 3,705,059
Executive Vice2015593,800957,391239,3482,262,37826,1748,3634,087,454 4,061,280
President, Global Chief2014585,0001,170,000292,5071,898,06130,75911,3953,987,722 3,956,963
Investment Officer, Aflac     
International; Chairman2017444,0091,563,541716,88539,6911,192,5823,956,7083,917,017
and Representative
Director, Aflac Life
Insurance Japan
Masatoshi Koide(6)2019595,9481,712,614922,550162,806206,4893,600,4073,437,601
President and
Representative Director,
Aflac Life Insurance Japan
*Total without Change in Pension Value represents total compensation, as determined under applicable SEC rules, minus the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column. This additional column has been included to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation as determined under applicable SEC rules. The amounts reported in the Total without Change in Pension Value column differ from the amounts reported in the Total column required under SEC rules and are not a substitute for total compensation. The change in pension value, as discussed in footnote 4 below, is subject to many external variables that are not related to the Company’s performance.
(1)In each of the 3three years above, includes $441,100 deferred for Mr. Daniel P. Amos. This amount has beenis included in the 20162019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below. See “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program — Base Salary” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for information about adjustments to base salaries in 2019.
(2)(2)In addition to his 2019 annual LTI grants, on November 12, 2019, Mr. Crawford received a one-time discretionary awardspecial recognition grant of 4,104 shares of performance-based22,235 time-based restricted stock thatunits. Mr. Crawford’s grant will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, ifgenerally subject to continued service through the related performance metrics are met.vesting date. In addition to their 2019 annual LTI grants, on February 14, 2019, Messrs. Lake and Koide received a special recognition grant of 10,289 time-based restricted stock units. Messrs. Lake’s and Koide’s grants will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued service through the vesting date; an additional vesting condition requiring and regulatory approval for the Japan Post Holdings alliance was achieved.
(3)In accordance with the SEC’s reporting requirements, we report all equity awards at their full grant date fair value under ASC 718.718 at the target level of performance for PBRS. The Company’s valuation assumptions are described in Note 12, “Share-Based Compensation”Compensation,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. See “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program — Long-term Equity Incentives” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for additional information about these long-term incentives and their terms. Assuming achievement of performance goals at the maximum level, the aggregate grant date fair value of the PBRS would be: Daniel P. Amos, $16,544,125; Frederick J. Crawford, $3,732,484; Eric M. Kirsch, $2,677,040; Charles D. Lake II, $2,462,468, and Masatoshi Koide, $2,425,139. See page 5049 for a more detailed discussion of our outstanding equity grants compared to current fair market value.value as of December 31, 2019.
(4)No amount in this column is attributable to above-market earnings on deferred compensation. The aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation of the defined benefit pension plan and Retirement Plan for Senior Officers for Messrs. Daniel P.Mr. Amos and Cloninger was a decrease of $1,299,019 and $243,315, respectively.$8,715,995. Mr. Crawford is not eligible to participate in the Company’s defined benefit plans because the plans were frozen prior to his hire date.before he joined the Company. See the “Pension Benefits” section and the accompanying table beginning on page 5250 for a more detailed discussion of the retirement plans.

46       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(5)Additional information regarding all other compensation is provided in detail in the “All Other Compensation” orand “Perquisites” tables detailed ontable below.
(6)Includes payments made to Messrs. Lake and Koide in yen for salary, non-equity incentive plan compensation, and some perquisites, and converted to dollars by dividing the following page.actual yen-denominated payments by the 2019 annual weighted average exchange rate of 109.07 yen to the dollar.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

47

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|20162019 All Other Compensation

2016 All Other Compensation

The following table identifies the amount of each item included for 20162019 in the All Other Compensation column in the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table on previous page.Table.

 Perquisites Company ContributionRenewal 
 and Other Personal      to Nonqualified DeferredCommissions from 
 Benefits    Company ContributionCompensationPrevious Job 
 (1)to 401(k) Plan(2)(3)Total
Name($)($)($)($)($)
Daniel P. Amos305,0527,950313,002
Frederick J. Crawford131,5737,950315,105454,628
Kriss Cloninger III131,4597,950139,409
Paul S. Amos II1,554,7807,95016,5951,579,325
Eric M. Kirsch9,3317,95017,281

Name     Perquisites and
Other
Personal
Benefits(1)
($)
     Company
Contributions
to 401(k) Plan
($)
     Company
Contribution
to Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation(2)
($)


     
Total
($)
Daniel P. Amos381,89611,200393,096
Frederick J. Crawford31,14916,800274,497322,446
Eric M. Kirsch18,52911,20029,729
Charles D. Lake II869,272869,272
Masatoshi Koide206,489206,489
(1)Perquisites are more fully described in the Perquisites table below.table.
(2)(2)Includes $315,105 of a Company deferred compensation contribution for Mr. Crawford. This amount has beenis included in the 20162019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below.
(3)Amounts are for earned renewal sales commissions before expenses on Aflac U.S. products sold before Mr. Paul S. Amos II became an Aflac employee.table.

20162019 Perquisites

The following table identifies the incremental cost to the Company of each perquisite included for 20162019 in the All Other Compensation table above.table.

   International   Total  Perquisites
 Personal Use ofSecurityAssignmentTax RelatedRelocation   and Other Personal
 Company AircraftServicesAllowanceReimbursementsExpenses    OtherBenefits
 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Name($)($)($)($)($)($)($)
Daniel P. Amos66,659237,446947305,052
Frederick J. Crawford1,04615,12190,19725,209131,573
Kriss Cloninger III108,34437222,743131,459
Paul S. Amos II136,0074,62065,2211,336,78612,1461,554,780
Eric M. Kirsch1069,2259,331

Name   Personal Use of
Company
Aircraft(1)
($)
   Security
Services(2)
($)
   Life
Insurance(3)
($)
   Tax Related
Reimbursements(4)
($)
   Car
Allowance(5)
($)
   Other(6)
($)
   Total Perquisites
and
Other Personal
Benefits(7)
($)
Daniel P. Amos186,139191,8464563,455381,896
Frederick J. Crawford26,1254207343,87031,149
Eric M. Kirsch2418,50518,529
Charles D. Lake II90,684568,176196,23014,182869,272
Masatoshi Koide200,1596,330206,489
(1)Incremental cost for the personal use of corporate aircraft is the calculated standard hourly cost rate based upon actual operating expenses for corporate aircraft, including fuel costs, airport fees, catering, in-flight phone, and crew travel expenses.expenses, and maintenance cost. This rate is recalculated annually. The personal use of corporate aircraft has been authorized by the Board of Directors for security reasons and to maximize the effectiveness of the executives’ time. Included in the amount reported for Mr. Cloninger is $10,373 for attending meetings of an outside board on which he serves.
(2)Incremental costs for security services include the salaries and benefits of security officers and the actual costs of any security equipment, monitoring, and maintenance fees.
(3)(3)All expenses were incurred as a direct result of Mr. Paul S. Amos II’s overseas assignment in Tokyo, Japan, which ended on December 31, 2015. Certain amounts were paid in yen and all are converted to dollars by dividing the actual yen-denominated payments by the year-to-date December 31, 2016 weighted average exchange rate of 108.70 yen to the dollar.
(4)AmountAmounts included in the Life Insurance column for Mr. Lake represent life insurance premiums paid for his policy during 2019.
(4)Amounts included in the Japan tax-related reimbursements for Mr. Paul S. Amos II represents Japan taxesLake represent tax equalization and tax gross-up payments ($1,336,786) paid by the Company in 2016 to satisfy tax obligations arising solely as a result of his international assignment. during 2019.
(5)Amounts included in the tax-related reimbursementsCar Allowance column for Mr. Crawford represent tax gross-up paymentsare charges for him that are relatedthe use of Company automobile transportation in the U.S. The amount included in the Car Allowance column for Messrs. Lake and Koide includes the cash cost to his relocation expenses.
(5)This amount represents certain relocation expenses of Mr. Crawford’s paid by the Company including $45,000 for real estate commissionsthe use of a leased car, driver compensation and $15,400 for duplicate housing.related expenses.
(6)Amounts included in the Other column are charges for guest travel in the amount of $947 (Daniel P. Amos), $25,037 (Mr. Crawford), $21,730 (Mr. Cloninger), $9,585 (Paul S. Amos II) and $975 (Mr. Kirsch). Messrs. Crawford, Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II incurred expenses for the use of Company automobile transportation in the U.S. Mr. Kirsch also incurred amounts totaling $8,150 for personal tax return preparation and financial planning.planning in the amount of $18,480 for Mr. Kirsch. Mr. Lake also incurred amounts totaling $10,021 for tax return consulting.
(7)Other than tax gross-ups reflected in the tax-related reimbursements, the Company did not gross up for tax purposes any of the other perquisites described in this table.

2020 Proxy Statement       47


48

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

2016 SummaryExecutive Compensation Tables

|20162019 Grants Ofof Plan-Based Awards

2016 Grants Of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information with respect to the 20162019 grants of plan-based awards forto the NEOs.

         All other  
         Option  
         Awards:ExerciseGrant Date
Name and 

Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(2)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
Principal PositionGrantThresholdTargetMaximum ThresholdTarget   Maximum   
 Date($)($)($) (#)(#)(#)(#)($/Sh)($)
Daniel P. Amos2/9/2016 40,03880,07580,0754,638,745
 12/30/2016 65,623131,246131,2469,134,722
 N/A    1,585,210    3,170,420    6,340,840 
Frederick J. Crawford2/9/2016 9,66719,33419,3341,120,019
 2/9/2016 22,53457.93280,003
 8/9/2016 2,0524,1044,104300,043
 N/A437,500875,0001,750,000 
Kriss Cloninger III2/9/2016 25,02850,05550,055  2,899,686
 12/30/2016 35,00570,01070,0104,872,696
 N/A731,2501,462,5002,925,000 
Paul S. Amos II2/9/2016 9,66719,33419,3341,120,019
 2/9/2016 22,53457.93280,003
 N/A437,500875,0001,750,000 
Eric M. Kirsch2/9/2016 8,20016,40016,400950,052
 2/9/2016 19,11557.93237,519
 N/A593,8001,187,6002,375,200 

Grant
Date
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)



Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
or Units(3)
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)
Name and
Principal Position
    Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
    
Daniel P. Amos2/14/201982,655165,309330,6188,272,062
N/A1,585,2103,170,4206,340,840
Frederick J.2/14/201918,64837,29574,5901,866,242
Crawford11/12/201922,2351,200,023
N/A453,125906,2501,812,500
Eric M. Kirsch2/14/201913,37526,74953,4981,338,520
N/A650,0001,300,0002,600,000
Charles D. Lake II2/14/201912,30324,60549,2101,231,234
2/14/201910,289500,045
N/A302,558605,1161,210,232
Masatoshi Koide2/14/201912,11624,23248,4641,212,569
2/14/201910,289500,045
N/A342,670685,3401,370,680
(1)The amounts shown in Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards reflect the payout levels for the NEOs under the Company’s MIP, based on the potential achievement of certain performance goals approved by the Compensation Committee.Committee on February 28, 2019. For additional information, please see “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program—Management Incentive Plan (MIP)” beginning on page 33.36. For each Company performance goal, a minimum, target, and maximum performance level is specified. The amount paid for each performance goal depends on the results attained.
(2)The amounts shown under Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards for February 14, 2019, reflect the number of shares of PBRS. Those shares incorporate restrictions that will lapse upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. Awards vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, based on the attainment of the cumulative three-year cumulativeaverage target performance goalgoals for Company AROE and the RBC and SMR ratios. PerformanceFor the cumulative three-year average performance period from 2019 to 2021, shares of PBRS will vest at 50% of target if the Company attains the minimum goals and at 200% if the Company reaches or exceeds the maximum goals. Earned amounts may then be modified based on the three-year period 2016 to 2018, calculated as the arithmetic average. For the three years, the awards will be earned upon achieving a minimum of 50% with a maximum of 100%.Company’s TSR performance versus peers. All NEOs possess the same rights as all other holders of Common Stock in respect of the shares underlying the PBRS, including all incidents of ownership (except the right to transfer the shares while they remain subject to forfeiture) and the right to vote such shares. The dividends accrued on the award sharesPBRS will be reinvested in Common Stock at the same dividend rate received by other holders of Common Stock. Those additional restricted shares will be held in the NEO book entry accountform in the custody of the Company subject to the same terms and conditions attributable to the original grant until such time as all restrictions have lapsed on the shares of Common Stock with respect to which the dividend was accrued.

AFLAC INCORPORATED(3)2017 PROXY STATEMENT

49On November 12, 2019, the Compensation Committee awarded shares of time-based restricted stock units to Mr. Crawford. The time-based restricted stock units will vest for Mr. Crawford on the third anniversary of the grant date (generally subject to continued employment). On February 14, 2019, the Compensation Committee awarded shares of time-based restricted stock units to Messrs. Lake and Koide. The time-based restricted stock units will vest for Messrs. Lake and Koide on the third anniversary of the grant date (generally subject to continued employment; an additional vesting condition requiring regulatory approval for the Japan Post Holdings alliance was achieved.).

48     Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

2016 SummaryExecutive Compensation Tables

|20162019 Outstanding Equity Awards Atat Fiscal Year-End

2016 Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides certain information with respect to the equity awards outstanding at the 20162019 fiscal year-end for the NEOs.

 Option Awards Stock Awards
   Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
             Number of Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
 Number of Securities
Underlying
 Option  Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
 

Shares, Units
or Other Rights

That Have

 

Unexercised Options

 Exercise Option Stock Not Vested Not VestedOption AwardsStock Awards
 Option Grant Exercisable Unexercisable Price Expiration Award Grant (1) (2)Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Name Date   (#)   (#)   ($)   Date   Date   (#)   ($)  Option
Grant

Date
  



Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Stock Award
Grant Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(1)
(#)
  Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
($)
  Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested(2)
($)
NameExercisable
(#)
   Unexercisable
(#)
 2/12/08 128,541 61.810 2/12/18 2/14/17505,046326,716,933
 8/12/08 261,952 55.720 8/12/18 
 2/10/09 155,712 22.130 2/10/19 
 8/11/09 324,915 40.230 8/11/19 
 2/09/10 146,386 47.060 2/09/20 
 8/10/10 216,402 50.890 8/10/20 
 2/08/11 152,752 57.900 2/08/21 
 8/09/11 163,797 39.610 8/09/21 
  2/11/14 36,947 2,571,511
  2/10/15 64,777 4,508,479
  12/31/15 17,330 1,206,168
  2/09/16 82,040 5,709,984
  12/30/16 131,246 9,134,722
Daniel P. Amos2/13/18412,133421,801,836
2/14/19337,652517,861,791
 7/01/15 21,348 62.430 7/01/25 7/01/1542,69631.2157/01/25
  7/01/15 14,099 981,290
 2/09/16 22,534 57.930 2/09/26 
  2/09/16 19,809 1,378,706
  8/09/16 4,152 288,979
Kriss Cloninger III 2/08/11 80,750 57.900 2/08/21 
 2/14/12 47,950 48.560 2/14/22 
 2/12/13 47,950 49.500 2/12/23 
 2/11/14 38,769 62.410 2/11/24 
  2/11/14 45,634 3,176,126
  2/10/15 51,606 3,591,778
  2/09/16 51,284 3,569,366
  12/30/16 70,010 4,872,696
Frederick J. Crawford2/09/1645,06828.9652/09/26
2/14/17105,23935,567,143
8/08/1725,9921,374,977
2/13/1888,01544,655,994
8/14/1866,6213,524,251
2/14/1976,17754,029,763
11/12/1922,3471,182,156
2/09/1638,23028.9652/09/26
Eric M. Kirsch2/14/1771,41833,778,012
2/13/1857,67243,050,849
12/11/1823,9521,267,061
2/14/1954,63652,890,244
2/11/1416,04031.2052/11/24
Charles D. Lake II2/10/1522,37830.7252/10/25
2/14/1733,06131,748,927
8/08/178,663458,273
2/13/1857,15043,023,235
2/14/1950,25752,658,595
2/14/1910,508555,873
2/14/173,20135.5202/14/27
Masatoshi Koide2/14/172,935155,262
2/13/1836,69241,941,007
2/14/1949,49552,618,286
2/14/1910,508555,873
50(1)

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

The RSU awards include accrued but unpaid dividend equivalents payable in additional RSUs calculated at the normal dividend rate and settled in shares of our common stock only upon distribution of the vested award.

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|2016 Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

  Option Awards Stock Awards
              Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
              Number of 

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

    

Number of Securities

Underlying

 

 

 

Option

     

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other

Rights That Have

 

Shares, Units

or Other Rights

That Have

    Unexercised Options Exercise Option Stock Not Vested Not Vested
  Option Grant Exercisable Unexercisable Price Expiration Award Grant (1) (2)
Name Date (#) (#) ($) Date Date (#) ($)
Paul S. Amos II 2/12/08 38,000   61.810 2/12/18      
  2/10/09 41,482   22.130 2/10/19      
  2/09/10 33,000   47.060 2/09/20      
  2/08/11 28,050   57.900 2/08/21      
  2/14/12 21,100   48.560 2/14/22      
  2/12/13 21,100   49.500 2/12/23      
  9/30/13 4,661   61.990 9/30/23      
  2/11/14   19,582 62.410 2/11/24      
            2/11/14 28,571 1,988,542
  2/10/15   26,306 61.450 2/10/25      
            2/10/15 18,694 1,301,102
  2/09/16   22,534 57.930 2/09/26      
            2/09/16 19,809 1,378,706
Eric M. Kirsch 2/11/14   17,152 62.410 2/11/24      
            2/11/14 20,189 1,405,154
  2/10/15   24,487 61.450 2/10/25      
            2/10/15 16,375 1,139,700
  2/09/16   19,115 57.930 2/09/26      
            2/09/16 16,803 1,169,489

(1)Includes dividend shares accumulated as of December 31, 2016, for PBRS awards granted as follows: awards granted on February 11, 2014, February 10, 2015, December 31, 2015, and February 9, 2016, respectively, of 2,639, 3,144,415 and 1,965 shares for Daniel P. Amos; awards granted on July 1, 2015, February 9, 2016, and August 9, 2016, respectively, of 516,475, and 48 shares for Mr. Crawford; awards granted on February 11, 2014, February 10, 2015, and February 9, 2016, respectively, of 3,259, 2,505, and 1,229 shares for Mr. Cloninger; 2,040,907, and 475 for Paul S. Amos II; and 1,442,795, and 403 shares for Mr. Kirsch.
(2)Based on the per share closing price of our Common Stock of $69.60$52.90 as of December 30, 2016.

Grant DateOptions Vesting Schedule31, 2019.
02/11/14(3)100% vestingRepresents PBRS granted in connection with the 2017-2019 performance cycle and vested on February 14, 2020, plus accrued dividends. Since our performance as of the end of the performance period exceeded the target performance measures, these awards are shown at maximum (200% of target), plus accrued dividends. These awards vested at 200% of target, plus accrued dividends, based on the third anniversary ofactual performance certified by the option for Messrs. Paul S. Amos II and Kirsch
02/10/15100% vestingCompensation Committee on the third anniversary of the option for Messrs. Paul S. Amos II and Kirsch
07/01/15100% vesting on the third anniversary of the option for Mr. Crawford
02/09/16100% vesting on the third anniversary of the option for Messrs. Crawford, Paul S. Amos II and KirschFebruary 13, 2020.

2020 Proxy Statement       49


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

51

Table of Contents

2016 SummaryExecutive Compensation Tables|2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

(4)Represents PBRS granted in connection with the 2018-2020 performance cycle. Since our performance as of the end of the last fiscal for this performance cycle exceeded the target performance measures, these awards are shown at maximum (200% of target), plus accrued dividends. However, the amount, if any, of these awards that will be paid out will depend upon the actual performance over the full performance period and the Compensation Committee’s certification of the performance after completion of the performance cycle, which should occur in the first quarter of 2021.
(5)Represents PBRS granted in connection with the 2019-2021 performance cycle. Since our performance as of the end of the last fiscal for this performance cycle exceeded the target performance measures, these awards are shown at maximum (200% of target), plus accrued dividends. However, the amount, if any, of these awards that will be paid out will depend upon the actual performance over the full performance period and the Compensation Committee’s certification of the performance after completion of the performance cycle, which should occur in the first quarter of 2022.

Stock Award Grant DateStock Award Vesting Schedule
02/11/1414/17, 02/13/18 and 02/14/19Graded vesting based on the attainment of the cumulative target performance goals for RBC ratios, SMR, and OROE of Aflac for three consecutive calendar years beginning with the year of grant. Each year a credit will be earned with a minimum of 50% and a maximum of 150% as measured at each year-end. The final award on 2/14/2017 was vested with a maximum payout of 100% based on the arithmetic average of the credit earned each year.
02/10/15 and 07/01/15Graded vesting on the third anniversary of the award based on the attainment of the cumulative target performance goal for RBC ratios of Aflac for three consecutive calendar years beginning with the year of grant. Each year a credit will be earned with a minimum of 50% and a maximum of 150% as measured at each year-end. The final award will be the arithmetic average of the credit earned each year, but with a maximum payout of 100%.
12/31/15Graded vesting of the award based on the attainment of the cumulative target performance goals for RBC ratios of Aflac for three consecutive calendar years beginning with the year of grant. Each year a credit will be earned with  a minimum threshold of 50% and a maximum of 150% as measured at each year-end. The final award will be the arithmetic average of the credit earned each year, but with a maximum payout of 100%.
02/09/16 and 08/09/16Cliff vesting on the third anniversary of the awardgrant date based on the attainment of the cumulative three-year average target performance goals for AROE, SMR, and RBC ratios of Aflac for three consecutive calendar years beginning with the year of grant. For the three yearthree-year period, stock will vest at 50% if the threshold RBC ratioof the three ratios is achieved, and 100%200% if targetthe maximum is attained. Earned amounts can then be modified based on the Company’s TSR performance versus peers (maximum payout up to 200%).
02/14/17For the award granted to Mr. Koide, vesting ratably on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
08/08/17For the award granted to Mr. Crawford, cliff vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. For Mr. Lake, vesting ratably on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
08/14/18, 12/30/1611/18 and 11/12/19Cliff vesting on 2/9/2019the third anniversary of the award basedgrant date.
02/14/19For the restricted stock unit grant, cliff vesting on the attainmentthird anniversary of the cumulative target performance goalsgrant date; an additional vesting condition requiring regulatory approval for RBC ratios of Aflac for three consecutive calendar years beginning with the year of grant. For the performance period, stock will vest at 50% if threshold RBC ratio is achieved and 100% if target is attained.Japan Post Holdings alliance was achieved.

20162019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information with respect to options exercised and stock awards vested during 20162019 for each of the NEOs.

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name     Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
     Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
     Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
      Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
Daniel P. Amos446,08221,679,596
Frederick J. Crawford50,2052,477,547
Eric M. Kirsch35,1421,707,901
Charles D. Lake II53,5581,109,66622,9851,153,778
Masatoshi Koide42,387776,53411,023532,284

 Option Awards Stock Awards
Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise

(#)

Value Realized
on Exercise

($)

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

(#)

Value Realized
on Vesting

($)

Daniel P. Amos477,6219,935,779 198,59913,665,431
Frederick J. Crawford 
Kriss Cloninger III104,0001,171,040 55,3803,173,832
Paul S. Amos II 24,3501,395,498
Eric M. Kirsch21,100407,546 24,3501,395,498

Pension Benefits

The Company maintains tax-qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plans that cover the NEOs other than Mr. Crawford, and nonqualified supplemental retirement plans covering the NEOs other than Messrs. Crawford and Kirsch. All of these plans were frozen before Mr. Crawford joined the Company.

The Company does not credit extra years of service under any of its retirement plans, unless required by employment agreements upon certain termination events. Messrs. Daniel P.Mr. Amos and Cloninger areis eligible to receive immediate retirement benefits. For Mr. Daniel P. Amos, retirement benefits, which fall under the provisions of the U.S. tax-qualified plan and the Retirement Plan for Senior Officers. For Messrs. Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II, retirement benefits fall under the U.S. tax-qualified plan and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. For Mr. Kirsch, retirement benefits fall under the U.S. tax-qualified plan. For Mr. Lake, retirement benefits fall under the U.S. tax-qualified plan for services when employed in an Aflac U.S. company and the Aflac Japan Officer Retirement Plan for current and previous services with Aflac Japan. For Mr. Koide, retirement benefits fall under the Aflac Japan Officer Retirement Plan for current services with Aflac Japan.

50       Aflac Incorporated


52

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|Pension Benefits

Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Aflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Plan”) is a funded tax-qualified retirement program that covers all eligible U.S.-based employees. Benefits under the Plan are calculated in accordance with the following formula:

       
1% of average
final monthly
compensation
x×years of credited
service up
to

25 years
+.5%0.5% of average
final monthly
compensation
x×years of credited
service in excess
of 25 years
       

For purposes of the Plan, final average monthly compensation is the participant’s highest average compensation (salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation) during any five consecutive years of service within the ten consecutive plan years of service immediately preceding retirement. Participants are eligible to receive full retirement benefits upon attaining a retirement age of 65. Participants also become eligible for full retirement benefits65 or, if earlier, when their years of credited service plus age equals or exceeds 80. Participants with at least fifteen years of credited service are eligible to receive reduced retirement benefits upon reaching an early retirement age of 55. The Plan was frozen to new employees hired, or former employees rehired, on or after October 1, 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2013, active participants in the Plan were given the option to exit the Plan and receive a non-elective 401(k) matching contribution.

Benefits payable under the Plan are not subject to adjustment for Social Security benefits or other offsets. The benefits are paid monthly over the life of the participant, with joint and survivor options available at actuarially reduced rates. The maximum annual retirement benefit was limited, in accordance with Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code, to $210,000$225,000 for 2016.2019. The maximum annual compensation that may be taken into account when calculating retirement benefits was limited, in accordance with Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, to $265,000$280,000 for 2016.2019. The limitation amounts for future years will be indexed for cost-of-living adjustments.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The Company’s Supplemental ExecutiveJapan Officer Retirement Plan (“SERP”) is an unfundeda non-funded and unsecured obligation of the Company and is not a tax-qualified plan. The SERP provides retirement benefits to certain officersbenefit for the plan is calculated as follows: for each year of service (with a minimum of two years and maximum of twelve), a Japan participating officer would receive one month salary plus one year salary for the Companylast year. The total amount calculated is paid in addition to those provided by the qualified Plan. Participation in the SERP is limited to certain key employees as periodically designated by the Compensation Committee.a lump-sum at retirement. Currently, Messrs. CloningerLake and Paul S. Amos IIKoide are the only NEOs who participate in the SERP. To be eligible for benefits underJapan Officer Retirement Plan, and Mr. Lake has accumulated the SERP, participants generally must be employed with the Company or a subsidiary at age 55. The SERP was frozen to new participants effective January 1, 2015.maximum service.

The SERP includes a four-tiered benefit formula that provides for a benefit based on final three-year average compensation (base salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation) earned for a calendar year as described below. The annual benefit varies based on the participant’s age at retirement: 40% is paid to someone who retires between the ages of 55 and 59, 50% is paid to someone who retires between the ages of 60 and 64, and 60% is paid to someone who retires at or after the age of 65. A reduced 30% benefit is available to participants with at least fifteen years of service who terminate employment prior to age 55.

Benefits generally are payable in the form of an annuity for the life of the participant. The participant may elect to receive reduced lifetime benefits, in which case any surviving spouse will receive a benefit equal to 50% of the amount paid to the participant. Benefits are calculated based upon the average annual compensation for the three consecutive calendar years out of the final ten consecutive calendar years of employment that yield the highest average. Benefits under the SERP are subject to offset for amounts paid under the qualified Plan.

Retirement Plan for Senior Officers

The CEO is the only active employee who participates in the Retirement Plan for Senior Officers (“RPSO”). Participants in the RPSO receive full compensation (base salary and MIP) for the first twelve months after retirement. Thereafter, a participant may elect to receive annual lifetime retirement benefits equal to 60% of final compensation (base salary plus non-equity incentive), or 54% of final compensation with 50% of final compensation to be paid to a surviving spouse for a specified period after death of the participant. Final compensation is deemed to be the higher of either (i) the compensation paid during the last twelve months of active employment with the Company, or (ii) the highest compensation received in any calendar year of the last ten years preceding the date of retirement.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

53

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Generally, no benefits are payable until the participant accumulates ten years of credited service at age 60, or twenty years of credited service. Reduced benefits may be paid to a participant who retires (other than for disability) before age 65 with less than twenty years of credited service. The CEOMr. Amos has 4346 years of credited service, meaning he is fully vested for retirement benefits under the RPSO. The RPSO was frozen to new participants on January 1, 2009.

All benefits under the RPSO are subject to annual cost-of-living increases as approved by the Compensation Committee. Retired participants and their spouses also are entitled to receive full medical expense benefits for their lifetimes. The benefits payable under the RPSO are not subject to Social Security or qualified Plan offsets.

2020 Proxy Statement       51


Table of Contents

2016Executive Compensation

2019 Pension Benefits

The following table provides certain information regarding the Company’s pension benefits at December 31, 2016,2019, and for the year then ended.

  Number of Years
Credited Service
Present Value of
  Accumulated Benefit*

   Change from Prior

Year

  Payments During Last

Fiscal Year

NamePlan Name(#)($)($)($)
Daniel P. AmosRetirement Plan for Senior Officers4351,886,230(1,367,308)
 Aflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan431,217,14168,289 
Frederick J. CrawfordAflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Kriss Cloninger IIISupplemental Executive Retirement Plan2522,349,210(312,810)
 Aflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan25798,00169,495 
Paul S. Amos IISupplemental Executive Retirement Plan126,489,7361,362,728
 Aflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan12280,05440,031 
Eric M. KirschAflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan5133,49736,505

Name     Plan Name     Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
     Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit*
($)
     Change from
Prior Year
($)
     Payments
During
Last
Fiscal Year
($)
Daniel P. AmosRetirement Plan for Senior Officers           46   51,322,174(8,993,908)           —
Aflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan461,719,982277,913
Eric M. KirschAflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan8283,89780,568
Charles D. Lake IIAflac Incorporated Defined Benefit Pension Plan15413,48379,158
Japan Officer Retirement Plan121,234,617(16,559)
Masatoshi KoideJapan Officer Retirement Plan11764,726162,806
*Assumed retirement age for all calculations was the earliest retirement age for unreduced benefits.

Assumptions used to calculate pension benefits are based on GAAP assumptions, as more fully described in Note 14, “Benefit Plans,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019, except that, for all NEOs other than Mr. Amos, the assumed retirement age is the earliest retirement age for unreduced benefits and, for Mr. Amos, who has exceeded such age, is his actual expected retirement age as determined for GAAP purposes.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table shows, for Messrs. Daniel P. Amos and Crawford, Company contributions to, and earnings and account balances under,provides information on the NEOs’ participation in the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”), an unfunded, unsecured deferred compensation plan..

20162019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

 

Name

Executive Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year

($)

Registrant Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year

($)

Aggregate Earnings (Loss)
in Last Fiscal Year(3)

($)

Aggregate Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

Aggregate Balance at Last

Fiscal Year-End

($)

Daniel P. Amos(1)441,100335,3096,194,606
Frederick J. Crawford(2)315,105315,105
Kriss Cloninger III
Paul S. Amos II
Eric M. Kirsch

Name     Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year
($)
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year
($)
     Aggregate
Earnings (Loss)
in Last Fiscal Year(3)
($)
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
     Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End(4)
($)
Daniel P. Amos(1)441,1001,940,69010,191,086
Frederick J. Crawford(2)274,497139,2411,414,243
Eric M. Kirsch
Charles D. Lake II1,972,2279,386,139
Masatoshi Koide
(1)The Company contribution of $441,100 deferred compensation for Mr. Daniel P. Amos is compensation deferred at the direction of the Compensation Committee and is included in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for the current year. Additionally, previous years’ deferrals included in the Aggregate Balance column were reported as compensation in prior periods.The funds are 100% vested.
(2)The $315,105$274,497 deferred compensation for Mr. Crawford represents unvested Company-funded executive employer contributions in the amount of 15% of Mr. Crawford’s annual compensation (base salary plus MIP). The funds for 2016 will be2019 were credited to the EDCP in March 2017.2020. This is an annual contribution approved by the Compensation Committee since Mr. Crawford is not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan or SERP.any other executive retirement plan. Annual contributions will be 100% vested on the earlier of (i) the later of 15 years of employment or 5 years participation, (ii) age 65, (iii) change in control, (iv) death, or (v) disability. The amount shown in the table is included in the Summary Compensation Table for the current year in the All Other Compensation column. Additionally, previous years’ deferrals included in the Aggregate Balance column were reported as compensation in prior periods.
(3)The Company does not pay or credit above-market earnings on amounts deferred by or on behalf of executives.

54(4)

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Previous years’ deferrals included in this column were reported as compensation in prior periods.

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The EDCP allows certain U.S.-based officers, including the NEOs (the “Participants”), to defer up to 75% of their base salaries and up to 100% of their annual non-equity incentive awards. The Company may make discretionary matching or other discretionary contributions in such amounts, if any, that the Compensation Committee may determine each year.

The EDCP is subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Deferred amounts earned and vested prior to 2005 (“grandfathered” amounts) under the EDCP are not subject to Section 409A’s requirements and continue to be governed generally under the terms of the EDCP and the tax laws in effect before January 1, 2005. All NEOs have met the applicable vesting requirements with the exception of Mr. Crawford.

52       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

The amounts in the Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End column include investment earnings (and losses) determined under phantom investments. Account balances may be invested in phantom investments selected by Participants from an array of investment options that substantially mirror the funds available under the Company’s 401(k) Plan, except for Common Stock. Participants can change their investment selections (unless prohibited by the fund) in the same manner that applies to participants in the 401(k) Plan.

Each year, when Participants elect whether to defer compensation under the EDCP for the following year, they also elect the timing and form of future distributions arising from those deferrals, with a separate election permitted for each type of deferral (i.e., salary and non-equity incentive award). Specifically, a Participant may elect distributions beginning in a specific year (even if employment has not then ended) or beginning six months after the termination of employment. Participants may choose to have any distribution made in a lump sum or in up to ten annual installments. Employee deferrals are 100% vested. Distributions attributable to discretionary contributions are made in the form and at the time specified by the Company.

A Participant may delay the timing and form of distributions attributable to deferrals as long as the change is made at least twelve months before the initial distribution date. With respect to non-grandfathered amounts, new elections also must satisfy the additional requirements of Section 409A. In general, Section 409A provides that distributions may not be accelerated (other than for hardships) and any delayed distribution may not begin earlier than five years after the original distribution date.

Deferral amounts for which no distribution elections have been made are distributed in a lump sum six months after a Participant separates from service.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

For purposes of this section only, the “Company” refers to Aflac Incorporated or Aflac, as applicable. The Company has employment agreements with each of the NEOs. Except as described below, the agreements are similar in nature and contain provisions relating to termination, disability, death, and a change in control of the Company.

Mr. Daniel P. Amos has voluntarily waiveswaived all “golden parachute” and other severance components in his employment agreement. Mr. Koide’s employment agreement (consisting of his employment agreement, Japan Officer Regulations, and Japan Procedures for Treatment of Officers) does not provide for any “golden parachute” or other severance payments or benefits (other than a retirement benefit as described below). The elimination and absence, respectively, of these potential payments has beenare reflected in the 20162019 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control table.

For theeach remaining NEOs,NEO, the Company remains obligated to continue compensation and benefits for the scheduled term of the agreement if the NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without “good cause” or by the NEO with “good reason.” The remaining term for each of these NEOs as of December 31, 2019 is as follows: Mr. Crawford, 30 months; Mr. Kirsch, 24 months; and Mr. Lake, 24 months. In addition, upon a termination by the Company without good cause“good cause” or by any of the NEONEOs (including Mr. Amos but excluding Mr. Koide) for good“good reason, all outstanding equity awards become fully vested, except that equity awards of the NEOs subject to Company performance will remain subject to that performance. Regardless of the reason for Mr. Kirsch entered intoLake’s termination, under his agreement, he will receive a newlump sum retirement benefit equal to two times his base salary. Unless Mr. Koide is dismissed by the Company for cause or violates his restrictive covenants, he will receive a retirement benefit determined under a formula in his employment agreement, effective January 1, 2016,and the amount of the retirement benefit will be reduced by the amount of the retirement benefit paid to him when he previously retired in 2006. For purposes of Mr. Koide’s retirement benefit, a “dismissal for cause” is a dismissal effected by resolution of the Board due to Mr. Koide’s (i) material violation of his obligations under his employment agreement; (ii) repeated violation of his employment agreement after warning to correct; (iii) commission of a crime or a reasonable suspicion that provideshe has done so; (iv) interference with Company business operations by failing to create cooperative relations with Company employees or by acting in bad faith; (v) actions in conflict with the Company’s interest, thereby possibly harming the Company’s interest; (vi) becoming insolvent or his credit standing is acknowledged to have deteriorated; (vii) conduct that is suspected as illegal, unjust or in breach of faith as an officer; (viii) lack of aptitude necessary for termination and changehis position or to fulfill the requirements of control compensation and benefits similarhis employment agreement, as judged by the Company; (ix) behavior or words contrary to his employment agreement, Company regulations or his duties; or (x) judgment by the compensation and benefits provided for the other NEOs. Messrs. Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II areCompany that he is not entitled to continued compensation after earning the maximum benefit under the SERP; Mr. Cloninger has earned the maximum SERP benefit and, therefore, would not receive continued compensation. Mr. Kirsch does not participate in the SERP.appropriate as an officer.

2020 Proxy Statement       53


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

If an NEO’s employment (other than that of Mr. Koide) is terminated by the Company for “good cause,” or by the NEO without “good reason,” the Company generally is obligated to pay compensation and benefits only to the extent accrued by the date of termination (except that the NEO, to the extent otherwise eligible,Mr. Lake is entitled to benefits underhis retirement benefit of two times his base salary regardless of the RPSO or under the SERP if the termination is notreason for “good cause”)his termination). Under the NEOs’ employment agreements “Good(other than that of Mr. Koide), “good cause” generally means that in discretion of the Company has determined that any of the following have occurred or exist: (i) the willful failure by the NEO to substantially perform assigned management duties (other than due to sickness, injury, or disability); (ii) intentional

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

55

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

conduct by the NEO causing substantial injury to the Company; or (iii) the NEO’s conviction of or plea of guilty by the NEO to a felony. “Good reason” (except in the case of Mr. Koide) generally is defined to include (i) a material breach of the employment agreement by the Company;Company in regard to compensation or benefits, or termination of the employment agreement; (ii) a material diminution or change in the NEO’s title, duties, or authority; or (iii) a material relocation of the Company’s principal offices (or in Mr. Kirsch’s case, the Company’s principal New York office or his own office; or in Mr. Lake’s case, the Japan operation’s office or his own office).; or (iv) the failure of the Company’s successor to assume the employment agreement. Upon voluntary termination without “good reason” or termination by the Company for “good cause,” an NEO (other than Mr. Koide) is prohibited for a two-year period from directly or indirectly competing with the Company. Upon Mr. Koide’s termination of employment for any reason, he is prohibited for a one-year period from competing with the Company and from soliciting employees.

The NEOs’ employment agreements provide that compensation and benefits continue for certain specified periods in the event the NEO becomes totally disabled. The amount of continued compensation for Messrs. Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II will be reduced by 60% if they are eligible for the maximum benefit percentage under the SERP. Mr. Cloninger has earned the maximum SERP benefit and, therefore, would be subject to this 60% reduction. Upon the death of an NEO (other than Mr. Koide), the NEO’s estate is to be paid an amount, over a three-year period, equal to the NEO’s base salary and any non-equity incentive awards actually paid during the last three years of the NEO’s life. In addition, all outstanding equity awards (including those of Mr. Koide) will be honored and vest upon the date of death or disability.

Upon a “change in control” of the Company, employment agreements for the NEOs (other than Mr. Daniel P. Amos)Messrs. Amos and Koide) are extended for an additional three-year period. If, following a change“change in control,control”, the employment of an NEO (other than Mr. Daniel P. Amos) with the CompanyMessrs. Amos and Koide) is terminated by the Company without “good cause” or by the NEO for “good reason,” the Company must pay to the NEO, among other payments but in lieu of any further salary payments, a lump-sum severance payment equal to three times the sum of the NEO’s base salary and non-equity incentive award under the MIP (as paid during periods specified in the agreement). If either of Messrs. Cloninger or Paul S. Amos II has attained the maximum benefit percentage under the SERP at the time of his termination following a change in control, he will not receive the lump sum award described above. Mr. Cloninger has earned the maximum SERP benefit and, therefore, would not receive this amount. Amounts payable upon a change of control“change in control” will be reduced to the extent they are not deductible by the Company for income tax purposes. If, following a change of control,“change in control”, the employment of ana NEO with the Company is terminated by the Company without “good cause” or by the NEO for “good reason,” all of that NEO’s outstanding equity awards (except in the case of Mr. Amos)Messrs. Amos and Koide) will become fully vested, and all performance criteria will be considered satisfied at the maximum performance level.

A “change in control” generally is deemed to occur when (i) a person or group acquires ownership of 50% or more of the Common Stock; (ii) a person or group acquires ownership of 30% or more of the Common Stock over a consecutive twelve-monthtwelvemonth period; (iii) during any period of twelve consecutive months, a majority of individuals who constitute the Board are replaced without endorsement by a majority of the Board members at the beginning of the period; or (iv) a person or group acquires ownership of 40% or more of the total gross fair market value of the Company’s assets.

Each of Messrs. Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II is a participant in the SERP, but Mr. Paul S. Amos II is not yet fully vested. Under the SERP, in the event the Company terminates a participant’s employment within two years after a change in control other than for cause, or a participant terminates employment during such period for good reason, the participant will become 100% vested in his retirement benefits and entitled to receive a lump-sum amount equal to the actuarial equivalent of the annual retirement benefit to which he would have been entitled had he remained in the employ of the Company until (i) age 55 (in the case of a participant who is not yet 55); (ii) age 60 (in the case of a participant who is at least 55, but not yet 60); or (iii) age 65 (in the case of a participant who is at least 60, but not yet 65), as the case may be. A “change in control” will be deemed to occur under the same circumstances described above but only with respect to the Company (and not with respect to any of its subsidiaries). “Cause” for this purpose generally means (i) the participant’s continued failure to substantially perform his duties with the Company (other than due to illness or after a participant gives notice of termination of employment for “good reason”) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the participant by the Board, (ii) the participant’s engaging in conduct materially injurious to the Company, or (iii) the participant’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony or crime involving moral turpitude. “Good reason” is defined for this purpose to include various adverse changes in employment status, duties, or compensation and benefits following a “change in control.”

The following table reflects the amount of compensation payable to each of the NEOs in the event of termination of such executive’s employment under various termination scenarios. The amounts shown assume in all cases that the termination was effective on December 31, 2016,2019, and therefore include amounts earned through such time and estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the NEOs upon their termination. The Company and Mr. Koide agreed to renew his employment agreement for one year through December 31, 2020, but this extension does not impact the amounts shown in the table. Because a number of factors affect the nature and amount of any benefits actually paid, amounts paid or distributed may be different from those shown below. Messrs. Daniel P. Amos, Lake and CloningerKoide are the only NEOs who are eligible to receive immediate retirement benefits. See “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above for more information about these benefits.information.

54       Aflac Incorporated


56

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

2016 SummaryExecutive Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As noted in the table below, the benefits provided, and requirements imposed vary with the circumstances under which the termination occurs. Additional relevant information is provided under “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above.

2016 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

  Before Change in Control   
  Company     Change
  Termination Voluntary   in Control
  without "Good Termination   Termination
  Cause" orCompanywithout "GoodVoluntary  without "Good
  by EmployeeTermination forReason"Termination  Cause" or
  for "Good"Goodand Nowith  for "Good
  Reason"Cause"CompetitionCompetitionDeathDisabilityReason"
  (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
NameBenefit($)($)($)($)($)($)($)
Daniel P. AmosSalary4,323,3002,161,650
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)15,080,7197,326,662
 Severance
 Retirement(9)51,886,23051,886,23051,886,23027,325,10351,951,17751,886,230
 Health & Welfare Benefits(10)2,300,3272,300,3272,300,327150,8802,318,3412,300,327
 Stock Options & Awards(11)23,130,8648,286,1588,286,15823,130,86423,130,86423,130,864
 Totals77,317,42154,186,55762,472,7158,286,15870,010,86686,888,69477,317,421
Frederick J. CrawfordSalary1,750,0002,100,0001,050,000
        
        
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)3,501,7504,301,4022,101,050
 Severance4,498,956
 Retirement(9)19,875315,105799,688315,105
 Health & Welfare Benefits(10)31,33318,80037,599
 Stock Options & Awards(11)3,065,0133,065,0133,065,0133,065,013
 Totals8,367,9719,781,5207,034,5517,916,673
Kriss Cloninger IIISalary2,925,000585,000
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)6,997,3961,392,917
 Severance
 Retirement(9)22,366,76622,349,21013,741,89022,406,64822,349,210
 Health & Welfare Benefits(10)150,713122,698122,698122,698122,698141,727160,756
 Stock Options & Awards(11)15,209,9666,767,9046,767,90415,209,96615,209,96615,209,966
 Totals37,727,445122,69829,239,8126,890,60238,996,95039,736,25837,719,932
Paul S. Amos IISalary1,400,0002,045,8001,050,000
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)3,239,2143,993,2002,346,057
 Severance6,958,821
 Retirement(9)15,9003,257,0345,368,5385,306,195
 Health & Welfare Benefits(10)25,37219,02938,058
 Stock Options & Awards(11)5,286,5805,286,5805,286,5805,286,580
 Totals9,967,06614,582,61414,070,20417,589,654
Eric M. KirschSalary1,187,6001,745,300890,700
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)4,524,7565,562,5612,859,609
 Severance8,568,534
 Retirement(9)30,85458,206
 Health & Welfare Benefits(10)25,37219,02938,058
 Stock Options & Awards(11)4,260,3074,260,3074,260,3074,260,307
 Totals10,028,89911,568,1688,087,85112,866,899

2019 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
 
Before Change in Control
Name  Benefit  Company
Termination
without
“Good
Cause” or by
Employee
for “Good
Reason”(1)
($)
  Company
Termination
for
“Good
Cause”(2)
($)
  Voluntary
Termination
without
“Good Reason”
and
No Competition(3)
($)
  Voluntary
Termination
with
Competition(4)
($)
  Death(5)
($)
  Disability(6)
($)
  Change
in Control
Termination
without
“Good
Cause” or
for “Good
Reason”(7)
($)
Daniel P.
Amos
Salary4,323,3002,161,650
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)15,469,5454,002,594
Severance
Retirement(9)51,322,17451,322,17451,322,17439,322,49651,393,78451,322,174
Health & Welfare Benefits(10)2,364,8032,364,8032,364,803188,1092,388,0412,364,803
Equity Awards(11)66,380,50748,518,71648,518,71666,380,50766,380,50766,380,507
Totals120,067,48453,686,977102,205,69348,518,716125,683,957126,326,576120,067,484
Frederick J.
Crawford
 Salary1,812,5002,150,0001,087,500
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)2,762,4534,436,2191,104,981
Severance6,350,004
Retirement(9)42,0001,414,2423,560,8051,414,242
Health & Welfare Benefits(10)40,57824,34748,693
Equity Awards(11)20,334,44320,334,44320,334,44320,334,443
Totals24,991,97428,334,90426,112,07628,147,382
Eric M.
Kirsch
Salary1,300,0001,837,600975,000
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)4,583,9906,266,9352,291,995
Severance8,400,261
Retirement(9)39,76276,443
Health & Welfare Benefits(10)27,47620,60741,214
Equity Awards(11)10,986,16610,986,16610,986,16610,986,166
Totals16,937,39419,090,70114,350,21119,427,641
Charles D.
Lake II(12)
Salary1,210,2321,647,0051,210,232
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)1,749,5982,266,811693,044
Severance4,439,745
Retirement(9)1,210,2321,210,2321,210,2321,210,2321,210,2321,210,2321,210,232
Health & Welfare Benefits(10)201,453151,090302,179
Equity Awards(11)8,444,9038,444,9038,444,9038,444,903
Totals12,816,4181,210,2321,210,2321,210,23213,568,95111,709,50114,397,059
Masatoshi
Koide(12)
Salary297,974
Non-equity Incentive Award(8)
Severance
Retirement(9)768,161768,161768,161768,161768,161768,161
Health & Welfare Benefits(10)
Equity Awards(11)5,326,1135,326,1135,326,1135,326,113
Totals6,094,274768,161768,1616,094,2746,392,2486,094,274

AFLAC INCORPORATED(1)2017 PROXY STATEMENT

57

Table of Contents

2016 Summary Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

(1)Each of Messrs. Crawford, Paul S. Amos IIKirsch, and KirschLake are entitled to salary continuation and non-equity incentive award payments for the remaining term of their respective employment agreements. Such payments would not be paid to Mr. Daniel P. Amos who voluntarily gave up his right to such payments, or Mr. Cloninger, who has earned the maximum percentage of benefits available under the SERP.payments. Health and welfare benefits would continue for the remainder of the contract term, except for Mr. Daniel P. Amos, who is entitled to health and welfare benefits under the RPSO. The table also reflects the value of continued medical benefits for Mr. Cloninger’s spouse and dependents payable under his employment agreement.
(2)Termination for good cause eliminates the salary continuation and non-equity incentive award obligation for the remainder of the contract period and causes a forfeiture of the executive (except for Mr. Daniel P. Amos) forfeits hisexecutive’s participation in any supplemental retirement plan.plan (except for Mr. Amos and Mr. Lake). In addition, all equity awards, whether vested or unvested, are forfeited.

2020 Proxy Statement       55


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

(3)Voluntary termination by the executive without good reason eliminates the salary continuation and non-equity incentive award obligations for the remainder of the contract term. In addition, nonvested equity awards will be forfeited, except in the case of Messrs. Daniel P.Mr. Amos, and Cloninger, who areis retirement-eligible under the terms of the Company’s equity agreements and will vest in all equity awards granted at least one year before the date his employment terminates (subject to satisfaction of performance goals).
(4)Any executive who competes with the Company after termination will forfeit the right to any further salary and non-equity incentive award payments and any benefits under the RPSO (however, Messrs. Lake’s and SERP.Koide retirement benefits will still be paid based on the plan document). In addition, nonvested equity awards will be forfeited, except in the case of Messrs. Daniel P.Mr. Amos, and Cloninger, who areis retirement-eligible under the terms of the Company’s equity agreements and will vest in all equity awards granted at least one year before the date his employment terminates (subject to satisfaction of performance goals).
(5)(5)UponWhen an executive (other than Mr. Koide) dies, the executive’s death, his estate is entitled to receive terminal pay (paid in equal installments over 36 months) equal to the amount of the executive’s base pay and non-equity incentive award paid in the previous 36 months, of his life, or, if the executive was employed less than 36 months, the amount hethe executive would have been paid if he or she had survived for the full 36-month period. Additionally, retirement benefits in this column include the present value of the accumulated benefit obligation for a surviving spouse annuity under the RPSO for Mr. Daniel P. Amos, and include the entirety of the retirement benefit under the SERP for Messrs. CloningerLake’s and Paul S. Amos II. Messrs. Crawford and Kirsch do not participate in the SERP.Koide’s agreements. Mr. Crawford participates in athe Company-funded EDCP, which will vest at death. The NEOs and other officers also are eligible for life insurance benefits along with, and on the same basis as, the Company’s other salaried employees. Mr. Lake also has a life insurance policy as part of his perquisites.
(6)Disability benefits are generally payable for 18 months or, if shorter, until the end of the term of the applicable agreement, while the executive remains employed during his disability. Anydisability except for Mr. Koide. For all NEOs other than Mr. Lake and Mr. Koide, any disability benefits paid in the form of salary continuation or non-equity incentive awards would be offset by the maximum annual amount allowed ($144,000) under the Company-sponsored disability income plan. Mr. Crawford participates in athe Company-funded EDCP, which would vest at disability. Mr. Cloninger’s benefitKoide is reduced by 60% sinceeligible to receive disability benefits paid in the form of salary continuation until he has qualified for the maximum percentage of benefits available under the SERP.reaches age 60.
(7)Upon termination after a change in control, Messrs. Crawford, Kirsch, and Paul S. Amos IILake would each be entitled a lump-sum severance payment of three times the sum of:of (i) annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, and (ii) the higher of the non-equity incentive award paid in the year preceding the termination date or the year preceding the change in control.control, whichever amount is higher. Mr. Daniel P. Amos has waived his entitlement to receive a severance payment. Mr. Cloninger would not receive this severance payment since he has reached the maximum percentage of benefits available under the SERP.
(8)The non-equity incentive award amounts on this line do not include the 20162019 non-equity incentive awards that were paid to the NEOs in March 2017,February 2020, and which were nonforfeitable as of December 31, 2016,2019, under all circumstances other than termination for competition.
(9)Amounts in this row generally include (i) the present value of the applicable benefits payable under the RPSO, and SERP, and (ii) certain additional amounts determined under the executive’s employment agreement in lieu of continued participation in the Company’s broad-based retirement plans. However, amounts included in this column reflecting benefits payable under the SERP may differ from the amountsThe amount shown in the Pension Benefits table due to reduced SERP benefits payable upon termination for “good cause” or death, and, for Mr. Paul S. Amos II, becauseLake is based on the retirement provision in his agreement, which provides for a benefit equal to two times his base salary at the time he hasretires, without regard to the reason for his termination (including if for cause). The amount shown for Mr. Koide is based on the retirement provision in his agreement, which provides for a benefit equal to two times his base salary less than the required years of credited serviceretirement benefit paid previously (40.8 million yen) at the time he retires, without regard to qualifythe reason for certain pension benefits.his termination (excluding if for cause).
(10)Amounts in this row generally represent the estimated lump sumlump-sum present value of all premiums that would be paid by the Company for applicable health and welfare benefits. The value shown for Mr. Daniel P. Amos includes his post-employment medical benefits under the RPSO for his life and the life of his spouse;spouse, the value of certain other welfare benefits;benefits, and non-medical fringe benefits (including office space) for his life. These amounts would not be payable if Mr. Daniel P. Amos became engagedengages in any activity that competes with the Company. The value of health coverage for each of Mr. Cloninger, Mr. Paul S. Amos II, Mr.Messrs. Crawford, Kirsch and Mr. KirschLake is the monthly cost of Company-paid premiums for active employee coverage under the health plan, multiplied by the number of months of Company-paid continued coverage for which hethe executive is eligible as determined under his employment agreement. The value of Mr. Cloninger’s health coverage also includes the actuarially calculated value of the Company’s obligation to provide continued medical coverage for his spouse and dependent children pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
(11)(11) RepresentsAmounts in this row represent the estimated value of accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock awards. The value for stock options and restricted stock awards was determined as follows: for stock options, the excess of the per share closing price on the NYSE on the last business day of the year over the per share option exercise price, multiplied by the number of unvested option shares;shares. The value for restricted stock awards was determined by multiplying the number of unvested stock awards multiplied by the same per share closing price used for options. The values of these awards that are performance-based assume maximum performance goals were achieved.
(12)All yen-denominated payments for Messrs. Lake and Koide are converted to dollars by dividing the payments by the 2019 annual weighted average exchange rate. The weighted average exchange rate was 109.07 yen to the dollar for 2019.

CEO PAY RATIO

The Company believes that executive pay should be internally consistent and equitable to motivate the Company’s employees and create shareholder value. To demonstrate the Company’s commitment to that principle, and as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and SEC rules adopted thereunder, we are disclosing the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO and Chairman, Mr. Daniel P. Amos, to the annual total compensation of the individual we have identified as the median employee for this purpose.

As determined in accordance with applicable SEC rules, for 2019, the last completed fiscal year:

58The annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table included on page 46, was $14,108,852; and

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

The annual total compensation of the median employee determined on this same basis was $56,371.

Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is 250 to 1.

56       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2016To identify the annual total compensation of the median employee, the Company first determined the compensation for all the Company’s employees other than the CEO as of December 31, 2019, taking into account the annual sum of cash wages, overtime and bonus from payroll records, in each case determined without regard to cost-of-living adjustments. As of such date, the Company’s employee population consisted of approximately 12,311 individuals working at the parent company and its consolidated subsidiaries, with 43% of these individuals located in the United States and 57% located in Japan. We excluded 146 employees of Argus Holdings, LLC, which the Company acquired during fiscal 2019 in a transaction that closed on November 7, 2019 and 69 employees of Tsusan Co., Ltd, which Aflac Japan acquired on May 8, 2019. The employee population above includes part-time and temporary employees as of December 31, 2019 (excluding employees on unpaid leave as of December 31, 2019), as compared to the employee population disclosed in the December 31, 2019 Form 10-K, which includes only full-time employees. For employees located in Japan, the compensation in Japanese yen was converted to U.S. dollars using the annual weighted average exchange rate of Japanese yen to U.S. dollars of 109.07 to 1 on December 31, 2019.

The Company determined that, on this basis, the median employee was a full-time, salaried employee located in the U.S., with wages, overtime and bonus pay for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2019, in the amount of $53,180.

With respect to the median employee, the Company then identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for the entirety of 2019 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K (the basis for determining annual total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Tables|Equity Compensation Plan InformationTable), resulting in annual total compensation in the amount of $56,371. The difference between such employee’s wages, overtime and bonus pay and the employee’s annual total compensation represents the value of such employee’s Company-paid benefits ($3,191).

Mr. Amos has been CEO of the Company since 1990 and Chairman since 2001. His longstanding tenure, coupled with normal changes in the calculation of his pension, causes his pension value (when calculated according to Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K) to vary greatly from year to year, which could cause large changes in the ratio.

Equity Compensation Plan InformationEQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance to our employees or Non-employee Directors, as of December 31, 2016.2019.

Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
Weighted-Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans Excluding
Securities Reflected in Column (a)

(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders6,424,390$52.568,770,662*
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
Total6,424,390$52.568,770,662

*Of the shares listed in column (c), 6,204,633 shares are available for grant other than in the form of options, warrants, or rights (i.e., in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units).

Plan Category     Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
     Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(b)
     Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column(a)(c)
Equity Compensation Plans4,958,703$29.6539,327,771*
Approved by Shareholders
Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by Shareholders
Total4,958,703$29.6539,327,771

AFLAC INCORPORATED*2017 PROXY STATEMENT

59Of the shares listed in column (c), 34,447,798 shares are available for grant other than in the form of options, warrants, or rights (i.e., in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units).

2020 Proxy Statement       57


Table of Contents

Proposal 2:Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationAudit Matters

We believe our compensation policies and procedures are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Since 2008, we have voluntarily provided our shareholders an annual advisory vote (commonly known as “Say-on-Pay”) now required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This vote gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation of our named executive officers through the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, executive compensation tables and accompanying narrative discussion in the Proxy Statement.”

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

We are committed to achieving a high level of total return for our shareholders. From August 1990, when Daniel P. Amos was appointed the CEO, through December 31, 2016, the Company’s total return to shareholders, including reinvested cash dividends, has exceeded 5,462%, compared with 1,341% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 1,101% for the S&P 500 Index, and 865% for the S&P Life & Health Insurance Index.

03
Proposal 3
FORRatification of Auditors
In February 2020, the Audit and Risk Committee voted to appoint KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to perform the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2020, subject to ratification by the shareholders.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommendsand the Audit and Risk Committee recommend a vote“for”FORapproval the ratification of the advisory vote on executive compensation.selection of KPMG LLP.

Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. These representatives may make a statement, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit Fees and Other Fees

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered to the Company by KPMG LLP for the two most recent calendar years were as follows:

     2019
($)
2018
($)
Audit fees — Audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements8,806,3958,006,762
for the years ended December 31(1)
Audit-related fees(2)802,7001,151,745
Tax fees(3)2,106129,614
All Other fees
Total fees:9,611,2019,288,121
60(1)Includes $1,043,848 and $798,956, respectively, for the 2019 and 2018 audits of Aflac Japan regulatory financial statements.
(2)

Includes fees relating to audits of the Company’s benefit plans, service organization control reports, accounting consultations in connection with proposed transactions or emerging accounting standards and other attestation reports.

AFLAC INCORPORATED(3)2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Tax fees include all services performed by professional staff in the independent Accountant’s tax division for tax return and related compliance services, except for those tax services related to the integrated audit.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit and Risk Committee of the Board has considered whether the provision of the non-audit professional services is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP’s independence and has concluded that it is. The Audit and Risk Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP in accordance with SEC rules, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services.

58       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Audit Matters

Proposal 3:Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Say-On-Pay VotesAUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT

As described in Proposal No. 2 above, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission require us to allow our shareholders the opportunity, at least once every six years, to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers in our proxy materials for future shareholder meetings. Under this proposal, shareholders may vote to have the Say-on-Pay vote every year, every two years or every three years, or may abstain from voting:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company indicate, by their vote on this resolution, whether the vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, pursuant to Rule 14a-21(b) of the Exchange Act, should take place every year, every two years or every three years.”

Each year since 2008, we have voluntarily provided our shareholders a Say-on-Pay vote. We believe our shareholders should be allowed a Say-on-Pay vote every year so they have a consistent opportunity to express their views on our executive pay program and policies. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Board will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering how often to include a Say-on-Pay vote in our proxy materials.


FOR
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends holding an advisory vote on executive compensation ofevery “year.”

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

61

Table of Contents

Audit and Risk Committee Report

Audit and Risk Committee Report

The Audit and Risk Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is composed of six Directors, each of whom, thethree Directors. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit and Risk Committee is independent as defined by the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules, and is financially literate. The Board of Directors also has determined that all members of the Auditliterate, and Risk Committee qualifyqualifies as an audit committee financial expertsexpert as defined by the SEC rules. The Audit and Risk Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. The charter, which is reviewed annually reviewed and complies with all current regulatory requirements, can be viewedis available on the Company’s website, www.aflac.com, by clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance,“Governance,” then “Governance Documents,” then “Audit and& Risk Committee.”

In 2016,2019, the Audit and Risk Committee met eleven times. During these meetings the Audit and Risk Committeecommittee members reviewed and discussed a variety of topics with management, KPMG (the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm), the internal auditors, the chief risk officer, the general counsel, the global security and chief information security officer, and others, a variety of topics, including the Company’s earnings releases and SEC filings related to quarterly and annual financial statements, statutory insurance financial statement filings, and the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, including information security policies. The Audit and Risk Committee has discussed with, and received regular status reports from, the Company’s Directordirector of internal audit and KPMG on the overall scope and plans for their audits of the Company. The Audit and Risk Committee met with the internal auditors and KPMG, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Audit and Risk Committee has monitored the Company’s compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding the reporting related to internal control over financial reporting. The monitoring process has included regular reports and representations by financial management of the Company, the internal auditors, and by KPMG. The Audit and Risk Committee also has reviewed the certifications of Company executive officers contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, as well as reports issued by KPMG related to its audit of the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with SEC rules and KPMG’s policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to the Company. For the lead audit partner, theThe maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacityas lead audit partner is five years. The process for selecting the lead audit partner for the Company pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee and prospective candidates, as well as discussions with the full Audit and Risk Committee and with management. The Audit and Risk Committee evaluates the performance of KPMG, including the senior members of the audit engagement team, each year and determines whether to reengage itre-engage KPMG or to consider other audit firms. In doing so, the Audit and Risk Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided; the firm’s global capabilities, particularly in the U.S. and Japan; its technical expertise; its tenure as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (KPMG has served in this capacity since 1973)1963); and its knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry. Based on this review and discussions with members of senior management, the Audit and Risk Committee concluded it was in the best interest of the Company and the shareholders to recommend KPMG to the Board of Directors to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm during 2016.2019. Although the Audit and Risk Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Audit and Risk Committee will continue its long-standing practice of recommending that the Board ask the shareholders to ratify this appointment (see RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMRatification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 4)3)).

The Audit and Risk Committee also discussed with KPMG those matters required to be discussed underby the rules adopted byapplicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the PCAOB). and the Commission. The Audit and Risk Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit and Risk Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence. The Audit and Risk Committee considered with KPMG whether the provision of non-audit services provided by it to the Company during 20162019 was compatible with its independence.

62

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Audit and Risk Committee Report

In performing all of these functions the Audit and Risk Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the Company’s quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K prior to filing with the SEC. In its oversight role the Audit and Risk Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for preparing the financial statements and other reports, and of KPMG, which is engaged to audit and report on the consolidated financial statements

2020 Proxy Statement       59


Table of Contents

Audit Matters

of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the reports of KPMG, the Audit and Risk Committee has recommended to the Board, of Directors, and the Board has approved, the audited financial statements to be included in the Company’s Annual reportReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, for filing with the SEC.

For additional information, see the “The Audit and Risk Committee” section on page 22.14.

Audit and Risk Committee
Karole F. Lloyd, Chair
W. Paul Bowers
Joseph L. Moskowitz

Audit and Risk Committee
Douglas W. Johnson, Chairman
W. Paul Bowers
Charles B. Knapp
Karole F. Lloyd
Joseph L. Moskowitz
Melvin T. Stith

Related Person TransactionsRELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

The Company recognizes that transactions between the Company and any of its Directors or executives can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, consistent with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, it is the Company’s preference to avoid such transactions. Nevertheless, there are situations where such transactions may be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Therefore, the Company has adopted a written policy that requires the Audit and Risk Committee to review and, if appropriate, to approve or ratify any such transactions. Pursuant to the policy, the Audit and Risk Committee will review any transaction in which the Company is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in any fiscal year, and in which any of the following had, has, or will have a direct or indirect material interest: (i) a Director, (ii) an executive officer, (iii) a holder of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares, (iv) an immediate family member of any of these persons, or (v) any firm, corporation, or other entity in which one of these persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial interest. During its review, the Audit and Risk Committee considers a number of factors, including whether the related person transaction is on terms no less favorable to the Company than may reasonably be expected in arm’s-length transactions. The Audit and Risk Committee will only approve or ratify those transactions that it determines in good faith are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Each of the following ongoing transactions has been reviewed and ratified by the Audit and Risk Committee:

Kriss Cloninger III is PresidentMr. Paul S. Amos II, Daniel P. Amos’ son, entered into a separation agreement with a Company affiliate on June 6, 2017, and his employment ended on July 1, 2017. Under the agreement, Mr. Paul S. Amos II provided an undertaking to protect corporate property for 24 months after the end of his employment and may not solicit Company employees or independent contractors to leave the Company. The agreement provided for Mr. Paul S. Amos II to receive an aggregate payment of $3,404,494 over the life of the agreement, which is equal to the sum of thirty months of base salary continuation, an annual incentive award with respect to fiscal year 2017, and the cost of eighteen months of premiums under the Company’s health insurance plan. The Company paid $700,000 during 2019. Per the terms of his agreement, no additional payments will be made to Mr. Paul S. Amos II.

In 2013, Aflac Japan (then operating as a branch of Aflac) entered a lease for office space at the Marunouchi Center Building in Tokyo, Japan, which is owned by Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd. The current lease has a term of 2 years. Mr. Toshihiko Fukuzawa who serves on the Company’s Board, was appointed as President and a memberCEO of Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd. in July 2018. The lease was in place prior to Mr. Fukuzawa’s service with Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd., and he had no involvement in negotiations of the Boardlease or in Aflac Japan’s decision to lease space in the Marunouchi Center Building. Mr. Fukuzawa receives no compensation from either the Company or Chuo Real Estate Co., Ltd. related to the lease. At the 2019 weighted average rate of Directors.109.07 yen to the dollar, Aflac Japan paid the yen equivalent of $2,359,493 in rent under the lease during the 2019 calendar year.

At the end of 2019, Mr. Max K. Brodén was the Senior Vice President, Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company. As of January 1, 2020, he is the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company. His son, Kriss Alan Cloninger,spouse, Sabrina Pasini Brodén, has been employed with Aflac since January 28, 2019. Prior to her employment with Aflac, she was an independent consultant in the Company since 2013. Kriss Alan Cloningermarketing department. She is currently a Field ForceCustomer and User Experience Consultant. In 2016, his2019, her total compensation, including salary, bonuses, commissions to the employment agency and other benefits, was $185,913.$120,916. The compensation for Kriss Alan CloningerSabrina Pasini Brodén is commensurate with that of hisher peers.

60       Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

63

Table of Contents

Audit Matters

Proposal 4:RatificationMr. J. Todd Daniels is the Director, Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of AppointmentAflac Japan. Mr. Daniels married Amy Jarreau Daniels in May 2019. Amy Jarreau Daniels has been an employee of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmAflac since April 2014. She is currently employed as a Sales Manager I. In 2019, her total compensation, including salary, bonuses and other benefits, was $332,193. The compensation for Amy Jarreau Daniels is commensurate with that of her peers.

In February 2017,As previously announced, on December 19, 2018, Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. (“Japan Post Holdings”), the AuditCompany, and Risk Committee votedAflac Japan entered in to appoint KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,a Basic Agreement regarding the “Strategic Alliance Based on Capital Relationship.” Pursuant to perform the annual auditBasic Agreement, Japan Post Holdings committed to acquire approximately 7% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s consolidated financial statements forCommon Stock via a trust and to treat the fiscal year 2017,Company as an equity-method affiliate after application of the “10-for-1 rule” (the rule included in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, pursuant to which, and subject to ratificationcertain limited exceptions, each Common Share is entitled to ten votes after it has been held for 48 consecutive months by the shareholders.

Representatives of KPMG LLP are expectedsame beneficial owner). Further, Japan Post Holdings and Aflac Japan agreed to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. These representatives mayreconfirm existing initiatives regarding cancer insurance and make a statement, and will be availablereasonable efforts to respond to appropriate questions.

The aggregate fees for professional services renderedfurther develop initiatives related to the continued growth of cancer insurance sales, such as positioning Aflac Japan cancer insurance as a product as important as Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd (“JPI”) products in the sales strategies of Japan Post Holdings, Japan Post Co., Ltd. (“JPC”) and JPI, and promoting cancer insurance sales and managing promotion based on established sales targets. Under the Basic Agreement, Japan Post Holdings and Aflac Japan also agreed to consider new joint initiatives, including leveraging digital technology in various processes, cooperating in new product development to promote customer-centric business management, cooperating in domestic and/or overseas business expansion and joint investment in third party entities and cooperating with regard to asset management.

On February 28, 2019, the Company entered into a Shareholders Agreement (the “Shareholders Agreement”) with Japan Post Holdings and certain of its affiliates. Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, Japan Post Holdings agreed to cause the J&A Alliance Trust, a New York voting trust (the “Trust”) to use commercially reasonable efforts to acquire, through open market or private block purchases in the United States, beneficial ownership of approximately 7% of the Common Stock in connection with the Basic Agreement. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed by KPMG LLP forJapan Post Holdings with the years endedSEC on January 8, 2020, the Trust had beneficially acquired 6.47% of the outstanding Common Shares as of December 31, were as follows:

 20162015
Audit fees — Audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31 *6,560,473$5,550,443
Audit-related fees **274,700164,500
Tax fees1,9271,895
Total fees:$6,837,100$5,716,838

* Includes $448,472 and $402,218, respectively, for2019. Japan Post Holdings is the 2016 and 2015 auditssole beneficiary of the Trust. According to a press release by Japan branch regulatory financial statements.

** Includes fees relating to auditsPost Holdings on February 14, 2020, the Trust had completed the planned beneficial acquisition of approximately 7% of the Company’s benefit plansoutstanding Common Shares as of February 13, 2020.

Since 2008, the Company and SSAE 16 attestation reports.

The AuditAflac Japan have maintained various commercial and Risk Committeecontractual arrangements with Japan Post Holdings and certain of its affiliates. Under these arrangements, affiliates of Japan Post Holdings conduct the sale of Aflac cancer insurance policies in Japan and, among other things, provide supplemental support necessary or beneficial to effectuating the sale and servicing of such policies. Aflac Japan’s cancer insurance policies issued pursuant to these contractual arrangements constituted approximately 4.4% of earned premium for 2019, representing approximately 3.0% of Aflac Incorporated’s total consolidated earned premium for 2019. In exchange for facilitating such sales and other services including JPI’s acting as reinsurer for a certain percentage of the Boardunderwriting risk for Aflac Japan cancer insurance sold by JPC and JPI, affiliates of Directors has considered whether the provision of the non-audit professional services is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP’s independenceJapan Post Holdings collectively received approximately $186 million in commission and has concluded that it is. The Audit and Risk Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP in accordance with SEC rules, subject to thede minimisexceptions for non-audit services.other payments from Aflac Japan during 2019.


FOR
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote“for”ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

2020 Proxy Statement       61


64

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Stock Ownership

Proposal 5:Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive PlanBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY’S SECURITIES

(As Amended and Restatedof February 14, 2017)

The 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”)25, 2020, no person was originally approved by our shareholders at their annual meeting held on May 3, 2004. At their annual meeting held on May 7, 2012, our shareholders approved an amendment and restatement that extended the termowner of record or, to the knowledge of the LTIP and made certain other amendments.

The Compensation Committee (for purposesCompany, beneficial owner of this Proposal 5 and Proposal 6, the “Committee”) and the Board of Directors have approved an amendment and restatementmore than 5% of the LTIP (as amended and restated, the “2017 LTIP”) to make certain amendments, subject to shareholder approval. You are being asked to approve the 2017 LTIP, which includes approval of the performance goals for use in regard to performance-based awards under the 2017 LTIP. If this proposal is not adopted, the LTIP will have expired on April 30, 2017 and the 2017 LTIP will be null and void.

Proposed Amendments

If this proposal is adopted, the 2017 LTIP will include the following amendments to the LTIP, among others.

EXTENSION OF TERM

The term of the LTIP will be extended from April 30, 2017 to February 13, 2027. Awards outstanding upon expiration would remain in effect according to their terms. Absent extension, the LTIP will have expired on April 30, 2017 (although, again, awards outstanding upon expiration would remain in effect according to their terms).

SHARES SUBJECT TO THE LTIP

The Company previously reserved (and shareholders previously approved) 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock or of the available for issuance undervotes of the LTIP, including 12,000,000 shares that may be awarded in respect of awardsCompany other than options or stock appreciation rights. Asas shown below.

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerTitle of Class
Common
Stock
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
Shares
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
Votes
Percent of
Class
Percent of
Available
Votes
J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation*     1 Vote Per     47,502,023     47,502,023     6.6     4.0
1007 Fukoku Seimei BuildingShare
2-2-2 Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0011, Japan
BlackRock, Inc.*1 Vote Per56,013,76556,013,7657.74.7
55 East 52nd StreetShare
New York, NY 10055
The Vanguard Group*1 Vote Per65,796,64365,796,6439.15.5
100 Vanguard BoulevardShare
Malvern, PA 19355
State Street Corporation*1 Vote Per38,568,88638,568,8865.33.2
State Street Financial CenterShare
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
*

The above information is derived from Schedule 13G filings filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated January 8, 2020, by J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation, dated February 5, 2020, by BlackRock, Inc., dated February 12, 2020, by The Vanguard Group, and dated February 13, 2020, by State Street Corporation. According to the Schedule 13G filings; J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation, has shared voting power with respect to 47,502,023 shares. BlackRock, Inc., has sole voting power with respect to 48,668,419 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 56,013,765 shares. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 1,094,696 shares, shared voting power with respect to 272,436 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 64,500,173 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,296,470 shares. State Street Corporation has shared voting power with respect to 34,477,261 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 38,498,841 shares.

62       Aflac Incorporated


Table of December 31, 2016, 8,770,662Contents

Stock Ownership

Security Ownership of Directors

The following information is provided with respect to each Director and Director nominee:

NameShares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned on
February 25, 2020
(1)
Percent of
Outstanding
Shares
Voting Rights on
February 25,
2020
Percent of
Available
Votes
Daniel P. Amos     4,468,935     .6     35,431,707     3.0
W. Paul Bowers31,402*169,020*
Toshihiko Fukuzawa3,011,364.430,011,3642.5
Robert B. Johnson39,120*240,576*
Thomas J. Kenny58,753*338,167*
Georgette D. Kiser2,631*2,631*
Karole F. Lloyd28,196*73,196*
Nobuchika Mori****
Joseph L. Moskowitz57,067*84,067*
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH134,266*929,362.1
Katherine T. Rohrer8,359*23,542*
Melvin T. Stith36,795*253,750*
*

Percentage not listed if less than .1%.

(1)

Includes 536,677 shares of restricted stock awarded under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for Daniel P. Amos that he has the right to vote. These shares will vest three years from the date of grant if the Company attains certain performance goals. Includes options to purchase shares, which are exercisable within 60 days for: Thomas J. Kenny, 29,470; Joseph L Moskowitz, 41,729 and Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH, 108,348. Also includes shares of restricted stock awarded under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for W. Paul Bowers, Tohsihiko Fukuzawa, Robert B. Johnson, Karole F. Lloyd, Joseph L. Moskowitz, Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH, Katherine T. Rohrer, and Melvin T. Stith 3,117 each, Thomas J. Kenny, 5,832 and Georgette D. Kiser 2,631, for which these individuals have the right to vote. These shares will vest one year from the date of grant.

Also includes the following shares:

Daniel P. Amos: 84,528 shares owned by his spouse; 991,826 shares owned by a partnership of which he is a partner; 908,632 shares owned by trusts of which he is trustee; 238,008 shares owned by the Daniel P. Amos Family Foundation, Inc.; 958,139 owned by the Soma Foundation, Inc.
Toshihiko Fukuzawa: 3,000,000 shares owned by The Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. Mr. Fukuzawa represents the power to vote these shares.

2020 Proxy Statement       63


Table of Contents

Stock Ownership

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth, as of February 25, 2020, the number of shares remained available for issuance under the LTIP.

If this proposal is adopted, there will be 37,500,000and percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the 2017 LTIP, including shares previously issued or reserved for issuance under the LTIP. The number of shares that may be awarded under the 2017 LTIP in respect of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights will be increased to 24,500,000, including shares previously issued or reserved for issuance in respect of such awards under the LTIP, such that 18,704,634 shares would be available for such awards under the 2017 LTIP. We are therefore asking for shareholder approval of an additional 12,500,000 shares to be available for grant under the 2017 LTIP, all of which would be available for grants of all award types, including incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the IRC.

Our long-term incentive program aligns the interests ofbeneficially owned by: (i) our employees, consultants and Non-Management Directors with those ofnamed executive officers, comprising our shareholders. In furtherance of this objective, our Compensation Committee has considered, among other things, the following two metrics in making equity grants under our plans: “historical burn rate” and “overhang.” Our historical burn rate is equal to the number of shares subject to equity awards granted during a period, assuming the target payout for performance-based awards, in proportion to our weighted average number of outstanding shares during such year. Our burn rate for fiscal year 2016 was .37%, and our three-year average burn rate for fiscal years 2014 through 2016 was .34%. Our overhang is the number of shares subject to equity awards outstanding at fiscal year-end plus the number of shares available for future grants in proportion to our shares outstanding at fiscal year-end. As of the end of fiscal year 2016, our overhang was 4.13%.

PERFORMANCE GOALS

Section 162(m) of the IRC generally limits the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of annual compensation paid to any “covered employee” in excess of $1 million. For purposes of Section 162(m), the term “covered employee” for any year includes our chief executive officerCEO, CFO, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (other thanas listed in the chief financial officer) who are serving asExecutive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement whose information was not provided under the heading “Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” and (ii) all Directors and executive officers atas a group.

COMMON STOCK BENEFICIALLY OWNED AND APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF CLASS AS OF FEBRUARY 25, 2020

NameShares(1)Percent of
Shares
VotesPercent of
Votes
Frederick J. Crawford316,316*1,249,598.1
Eric M. Kirsch     291,834     *     1,506,888     .1
Charles D. Lake II196,546*936,850.1
Masatoshi Koide99,405*197,685*
All Directors, nominees, and executive officers as a group (25 individuals)10,019,9221.477,797,6596.6
*

Percentage not listed if less than .1%.

(1)

Includes options that are exercisable within 60 days for Frederick J. Crawford, 87,764; Eric M. Kirsch, 38,230; Charles D. Lake II, 38,418; Matoshi Koide, 3,201; and for all Directors and executive officers as a group to purchase 685,865 shares. These shares will vest 3 years from the date of grant if the Company attains certain performance goals. Also includes the following shares of restricted stock awarded under the Long-Term Incentive Plan: in 2018, 2019 and 2020 for Frederick J. Crawford, 121,413; Eric M. Kirsch, 80,935; Charles D. Lake II, 77,167; Masatoshi Koide, 65,815; and for all Directors and executive officers as a group of 1,301,207. The grantees have the right to vote their restricted stock, but they may not transfer the shares until they have vested. No Director nominee or executive officer has any pledged shares. For information on the Company’s pledging policy, please see “Stock Ownership Guidelines; Hedging and Pledging Restrictions” on page 44.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, executive officers, Directors, and holders of more than 10% of the Common Stock are required to file reports of their trading in Company equity securities with the SEC. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports received by the Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all filings required to be made by its reporting persons complied with all applicable Section 16 filing requirements during the last fiscal year end and whose compensation is subject to disclosure inwith one exception: Mr. J. Todd Daniels, an executive officer, did not timely report on his July 2019 Form 4 the proxy statement for that year’s annual meeting of shareholders. Certainshares owned by his new spouse.

64       Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

65

Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy

Proposal 5: ProposalThis Proxy Statement is furnished to Approveshareholders in connection with the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

compensation paid based on the achievementsolicitation of pre-established performance goals is excluded from this deduction limit if the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the performance goals to be used, are approved by shareholders. Our shareholders previously approved the LTIP at our 2012 annual meeting, which satisfied these approval requirements.

Where, as is the case under the 2017 LTIP, the applicable targets under the performance goals may be varied (for instance, where the approved goal is any earnings per share measure and the Committee is then free to establish specific required earnings per share metrics and levels), Section 162(m) requires that shareholders reapprove the performance goals every five years. In addition, the 2017 LTIP includes changes to the authorized performance goals under the LTIP. Accordingly, as part of this proposal, we are asking shareholders to approve the performance goals for use in regard to performance-based awards under the 2017 LTIP so that we may be able to deduct incentive compensation paid pursuant to such awards if we determine it is appropriate to do so.

As approvedproxies by the Company’s Board of Directors subject(the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to shareholder approval,be held on Monday, May 4, for the 2017 LTIP providespurposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and described in detail herein, and any adjournment of that meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at 10 a.m. at the Columbus Museum (in the Patrick Theatre), 1251 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia. We continue to monitor developments regarding the coronavirus (COVID-19). In the interest of the health and well-being of our shareholders, we are planning for the possibility that the Committee in its sole discretion may condition the vesting or exercisability of any award granted under it on the attainment of performance goals that are pre-established by the Committee and that are based, for any period specified by the Committee in its sole discretion, on one or more of the following criteria: new premium sales; premium income; investment income; revenues; total insurance benefits (cash claims, increase in future benefits and incurred but not reported claims); expense levels; premium payment levels; persistency rate (based on premiums or policies); policy renewals; profit margins; operating earnings (excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion the effects of one or more of the following items: realized gains or losses on investments, the impact from passive derivative activities and hedging, the change in fair value of the interest rate component of cross-currency swaps, and items considered by the Committee to be nonrecurring in nature such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by a state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, or items excluded from the presentation of operating earnings in the information filed or furnished by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time); net earnings (either before or after provision for the cumulative effect of required accounting changes for the applicable period); return on equity (operating earnings excluding the impact of foreign exchange divided by the average of common shareholders’ equity in the Company as of the beginning and end of the applicable period, excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion accumulated comprehensive income as recognized under ASC 320); new money investment yield; return on invested assets; shareholders’ equity; operating return on shareholders’ equity; regulatory capital levels; return on regulatory capital; risk-based capital levels or ratios; solvency margin ratio; stock price; total return to shareholders; or, to the extent an award is made to an individual who is not a covered employee under Section 162(m) of the IRC, such other performance goals as the Committee shall deem appropriate.

As approved by the Board of Directors, subject to shareholder approval, the 2017 LTIP also provides that as determined by the Committee, achievement of the performance goalsAnnual Meeting may be measured (a) individually, alternatively orheld solely by means of remote communication. If we make this change, we will announce the decision to do so in any combination, (b) with respectadvance and provide details on how to participate at investors.aflac.com.

The mailing address of our principal executive offices is Aflac Incorporated, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999.

All properly executed proxies returned to the Company a subsidiary, division, business unit or segment, product line, product,will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained thereon. If you return your signed proxy with no voting instructions indicated, the proxy will be voted FOR the election of all Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, FOR approval of Proposals 2 and 3, and according to the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any combinationpostponement or adjournment thereof. If you are a shareholder of record, you also may submit your proxy online or by telephone in accordance with the procedures set forth in the enclosed proxy, or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders can revoke a proxy at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice to that effect to the Secretary of the foregoing, (c)Company or by submitting a later-dated proxy or subsequent internet or telephonic proxy. Shareholders who attend the Annual Meeting may revoke any proxy previously granted and vote in person orally or by written ballot.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are being delivered to shareholders on an absolute basis, or relativeabout March 19, 2020.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. The Company will make arrangements with brokerage firms, custodians, and other fiduciaries to a target,send proxy materials to growth levels, to a designated comparison group, to results intheir customers, and will reimburse these entities for the associated mailing and related expenses. In addition, certain officers and other periods, to an index, or to other external measures, and (d) on an aggregate or per-share basis. Performance goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no award will be earned, levels of performance at which an award will become partially earned and a level at which an award will be fully earned. To the extent required to qualify payment under an award as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m)employees of the IRC, awards whose vesting or exercise is conditionedCompany may solicit proxies by telephone and by personal contacts, but those individuals will not receive additional compensation for these efforts. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $9,500, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL REPORT

As permitted by SEC rules, we are making these proxy materials available to our shareholders electronically. We believe providing online access to our critical documents will conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. Accordingly, we have mailed to most of our shareholders a notice about the internet availability of this Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2019 Year in Review and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the attainmentyear ended December 31, 2019 (together, the “Annual Report”) instead of performance goals shall become vested or exercisable (aspaper copies of those documents. The notice contains instructions on how to access our reports online, how to vote at proxyvote.com, and how to request and receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report. If you select the case may be) only afteronline access option for the attainmentProxy Statement, Annual Report, and other account mailings throughaflinc®, the Company’s secure online account management system, you will receive an electronic notice of such performance goals has been certified by the Committee. The Committee may provide that the achievementavailability of performance goals shall be determined without regard to the impact of any event or occurrence which the Committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by any state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges,your proxy materials. If you do not receive a change in accounting standards required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), items of an unusual or infrequently recurring nature, changes in applicable laws or regulations, or by excluding all ornotice and did not already elect online access, you will receive a portionpaper copy of the effect of translating foreign currently of business segments to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes; provided that with respect to awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the IRC, the Committee shall not exercise any discretion with respect to such an award that would cause it to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation. With respect to participants who are not covered employees, performance goals may also include such qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish; and with respect to participants who are covered employees, the Committee may, subject to attainment of performance goals described above, impose additional qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish.proxy materials by mail.

2020 Proxy Statement      65


66

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy

Proposal 5: Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

ADDITIONAL CHANGESMULTIPLE SHAREHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS

The 2017 LTIP makes certainCompany is sending only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement or notice of availability of these materials to shareholders who consented and who share a single address. This is known as “householding.” However, any registered shareholder who wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement may contact Shareholder Services by phone at (800) 227-4756, by email at shareholder@aflac.com, or by mail at the address set forth above and we will promptly provide additional copies. If you receive multiple copies of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement or notice of availability of these materials, you may request householding by contacting Shareholder Services (if you are a registered shareholder) or by contacting the holder of record (if you own the Company’s shares through a bank, broker, or other changesholder of record).

DESCRIPTION OF VOTING RIGHTS

The Company believes that long-term shareholders should have a greater say in our success. Accordingly, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that each share of the Company’s Common Stock is entitled to one vote until it has been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of longer than 48 months prior to the LTIP, the most significant of which are described below.

Summaryrecord date of the 2017 LTIP

The descriptionmeeting, at which time each share becomes entitled to ten votes. If a share is transferred by gift, devise, or bequest, or otherwise through the laws of inheritance, descent, or distribution from the estate of the 2017 LTIP set out belowtransferor, or by distribution to a beneficiary of shares held in trust, the transferee is qualified in its entirety by the complete current text of the 2017 LTIP (as we have amended it subject to shareholder approval pursuant to this Proposal 5), which is attached hereto as Appendix A.

PURPOSE

The 2017 LTIP is intended to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing officers and other employees of the Company or its affiliates with appropriate incentives and rewards to encourage them to enter into and continue in the employ of the Company or its affiliates and to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company; to compensate the Company’s Non-employee Directors and provide incentives to such Non-employee Directors that are directly linked to increases in stock value; and to reward the performance of individual officers, other employees and Non-employee Directors in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievements.

ADMINISTRATION

The 2017 LTIP is administered by the Committee. To the extent necessary to satisfy applicable legal requirements, each member of the Committee will be a “Non-employee Director” (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) and an “Outside Director” (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the IRC).

The Committee has the authority in its sole discretion, subject to and not inconsistent with the express provisions of the 2017 LTIP, to administer the 2017 LTIP and to exercise all the powers and authorities either specifically granted to it under the 2017 LTIP or necessary or advisable in the administration of the 2017 LTIP, including without limitation the authority to grant awards under it; to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which awards shall be granted; to determine the type and number of awardsdeemed to be granted,the same beneficial owner as the transferor for purposes of determining the number of votes per share. Shares acquired as a direct result of a stock split, stock dividend, or other distribution with respect to existing shares are deemed to have been acquired and held continuously from the date on which the underlying shares were acquired. Shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a stock option are deemed to have been acquired on the date the option was granted.

Shares of Common Stock held in “street” or “nominee” name are presumed to have been held for less than 48 months and are entitled to one vote per share unless this presumption is rebutted by evidence to the contrary. If you wish to demonstrate that you have held your Common Stock in street name for longer than 48 months, please complete and execute the affidavit appearing on the reverse side of your proxy. The Board may require evidence to support the affidavit.

QUORUM AND VOTE REQUIREMENTS

Holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on February 25, 2020, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At that date, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to which an award may relate andvote was 722,511,510. According to the terms, conditions, restrictions and performance criteria relatingCompany’s records, this represents the following voting rights:

Number of
shares
Votes per shareYields this
many votes
671,493,763@1=671,493,763
51,017,747@10=510,177,470
722,511,510Total1,181,671,233

If all of the outstanding shares were entitled to any award; to determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an awardten votes per share, the total number of possible votes would be 7,225,115,100. However, for purposes of this Proxy Statement, we assume that the total number of votes that may be settled, canceled, forfeited, exchanged, or surrendered; to make adjustments in performance goals in recognitioncast at the Annual Meeting will be 1,181,671,233.

The holders of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company or the financial statementsshares representing a majority of the Company,voting rights entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles; to construe and interpret the 2017 LTIP and any award; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2017 LTIP, including without limitation rules and regulations relating to leaves of absence and changes from an employee torepresented by proxy, will constitute a service provider or consultant and vice versa; to determine the terms and provisions of agreements under awards; and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisablequorum for the administration of the 2017 LTIP.

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, without amendment to the 2017 LTIP, in the event of a participant’s death, disability or retirement, (i) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the exercisetransaction of any option or stock appreciation right granted tobusiness that comes before the participant, waive or amendmeeting. Abstentions are counted as “shares present” for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the operation of 2017 LTIP provisions respecting exercise after termination of employment or otherwise adjust any of the terms of such option or stock appreciation right, and (ii) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the vesting of any restricted stock or restricted stock unit granted to the participant or otherwise adjust any of the terms applicable to any such award.

The Committee may delegate all, or any part, of its administrativenominee does not have discretionary voting power where consistent with applicable securities and tax law requirements.

SHARES AUTHORIZED

The Company previously reserved (and shareholders previously approved) 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the LTIP. If this proposal is adopted, there will be 37,500,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 2017 LTIP including 18,609,992 shares (determined as of February 22, 2017) already granted, or reserved in respect of awards already granted, under the LTIP. No individual may be granted awards under the 2017 LTIP in any calendar year covering more than 1,500,000 shares (a limit that remains unchanged from that under the LTIP). In addition, the number of shares with respect to which awards other than options or stock appreciation rights may be granted overthat item and has not received voting instructions from the lifebeneficial owner. Broker non-votes are counted as “shares present” at the Annual Meeting for purposes of the 2017 LTIP may not exceed 24,500,000.determining whether a quorum exists.

66      Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

67

Table of Contents

Solicitation and Revocation of Proxy

Proposal 5: Proposal to ApproveThe following table shows the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Planvoting requirements for each proposal we expect at the Annual Meeting.

ProposalVote required to PassEffect of abstentions and broker non-votes
Uncontested election of directors
Votes cast for a nominee exceed votes cast against that nomineeAbstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and have no effect
Advisory say-on-pay
Majority of the votes castAbstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and have no effect
Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Majority of the votes castAbstentions are not counted as votescast and have no effect. Brokers and other nominees may vote without instructions, so we do not expect broker non-votes.

If a nominee who is already serving as a Director is not re-elected at the Annual Meeting in an award granted underuncontested election, Georgia law provides that Director would continue to serve on our Board as a “holdover director.” However, our Director Resignation Policy, which is part of the 2017 LTIP expires or is terminated,Company's Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues, provides that holdover directors must tender a resignation to our Chairman of the shares of Common Stock underlying the awardBoard. The Corporate Governance Committee will again be available under the 2017 LTIP, exceptconsider such resignation and recommend to the extent thatBoard whether to accept or reject it. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider all factors its members deem relevant, including the stated reasons why shareholders voted against such shares are tendered in payment for an option, are delivered or withheld byDirector, the Company or the Participant to satisfy any tax withholding obligation, or are shares covered by a stock-settled stock appreciation right that were not issued upon the settlementqualifications of the award. InDirector, and whether the event of any changeresignation would be in the Company’s capitalization or in the event of a corporate transaction such as a merger, consolidation, separation or similar event, the 2017 LTIP provides for appropriate adjustments in the number and class of shares of stock available for issuance or grant and in the number and/or price of shares subject to awards.

ELIGIBILITY

Awards may be granted under the 2017 LTIP to employeesbest interests of the Company and its subsidiaries (currently approximately 9,900 individuals), as selected by the Committee in its sole discretion, and Non-employee Directors of the Company (currently 11 individuals). For purposes of the foregoing, employees shall include prospective employees to whom awards are granted in connection with an offer of future employment with the Company or its affiliates.

TYPES OF AWARDS

shareholders. The Committee may grant four types of awards under the 2017 LTIP: (i) options (including incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the IRC and nonqualified options that do not qualify as incentive stock options), (ii) restricted stock, (iii) restricted stock units and (iv) stock appreciation rights. Each awardBoard will be evidenced by an agreement which shall contain such provisions as the Committee may in its sole discretion deem necessary or desirable and which are not in conflict with the terms of the 2017 LTIP.

STOCK OPTIONS

Options entitle the holder to purchase shares of Common Stock during a specified period at a purchase price specified by the Committee (but not less than the fair market value of the Common Stockformally act on the day the option is granted). Each option granted under the 2017 LTIP is exercisable for a period of 10 years fromCorporate Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than ninety days following the date of grant, orthe Annual Meeting at which the election occurred. The Company will, within four business days after such lesser period asdecision were made, publicly disclose that decision in a Form 8-K filed with the Committee shall determine. Options may be exercised in whole or in part, generally in amounts of 100 shares or more, by the payment in cashSEC, together with a full explanation of the full option priceprocess by which the decision was made and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. If there were a nominee who was not already serving as a Director, and that individual was not elected at the Annual Meeting, that nominee would not become a Director or a holdover director.

In a contested election at an annual meeting of shareholders (meaning the number of nominees exceeds the number of Directors to be elected), the standard for election of Directors would be a plurality of the shares purchased,represented in person or by tenderingproxy at such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of Directors.

EFFECT OF NOT CASTING A VOTE

If you hold your shares of Common Stock with a fair market value equalin street name, it is critical that you provide voting instructions to the option pricerecord owner. Your bank or broker is not permitted to vote shares you hold in street name without your instructions in the election of Directors (Proposal 1) or on the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 2). Broker non-votes on these matters will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals. Your bank or broker may vote uninstructed shares purchased, or by other methods approved byon the Committee. Options that are exercisable asratification of the date of a participant’s termination of service with the Company (for any reason other than “Cause,” as defined in the 2017 LTIP) may be exercised after such date for the period set forth in the option agreement or as otherwise determined by the Committee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable option agreement, options held by a participant upon termination from the Company’s service for Cause shall immediately expire (whether or not then exercisable). The Committee has discretion to vary any of the rules set forth above concerning options.

RESTRICTED STOCK

A restricted stock award consists of a grant of a share of Common Stock that is subject to a risk of forfeiture. For each share of restricted stock, the price to be paid by a participant and the date of, and any conditions to, vesting shall be determined by the Committee in its discretion. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, a holder of restricted stock may not transfer such shares prior to vesting. A holder of restricted stock may vote such shares and may receive all dividends on such shares (provided that the Committee may determine that dividends on such shares shall be reinvested and/or held in escrow until the restrictions on the underlying shares lapse). Upon termination of employment with the Company, a holder of restricted stock may, and if the termination is for Cause shall, be required to transfer to the Company such restricted stock together with any dividends held in escrow thereon.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

A restricted stock unit award entitles the holder to receive one (1) shareappointment of the Company’s Common Stock followingindependent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3).

If you are a shareholder of record and you do not return your proxy card, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any item of business at the vesting date. For each restricted stock unit, the date of, and any conditions to, vesting shall be determined by the Committee in its discretion. Upon the grant of a dividend with respect to Common Stock, each restricted stock unit shall be credited with dividend equivalents that shall be converted into additional restricted stock units with a value equal to the amount of the underlying dividend. Upon termination of a participant’s employment with the Company for any reason, all restricted stock units held by the participant that have not yet vested, and any associated dividend equivalents, shall be forfeited unless the Committee has provided otherwise in an applicable award agreement.Annual Meeting.

2020 Proxy Statement      67


68

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Proposal 5: Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS (“SARs”)

An SAR entitles the participant, upon exercise, to shares of Common Stock with a fair market value equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock over the grant price of the SAR. The grant price of each SAR will not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of the grant. An SAR is exercisable only upon such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee in its discretion. The Committee shall determine the term of an SAR, provided it shall not exceed 10 years.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AWARDS

No awards shall be provided to Non-employee Directors (as defined in the 2017 LTIP) other than as described below. Awards to a Non-employee Director under the 2017 LTIP shall generally be made on the same terms and conditions as apply to awards to employees under the 2017 LTIP, except that the functions otherwise reserved to the Committee under the 2017 LTIP shall be exercised by the Board of Directors (exclusive of the affected Non-employee Director), and except as summarized under “Special Vesting Rights” below.

Each person upon first becoming a Non-employee Director is granted on such date either an option, a stock appreciation right, restricted stock or a combination thereof, in any event having a value as of the date of grant (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not in excess of the value of an option covering an aggregate of 10,000 shares of Company stock (subject to adjustment as described above upon changes in capitalization or other corporate events); provided, however, that no such award shall be granted to a Director who previously did not qualify as a Non-employee Director but subsequently becomes a Non-employee Director solely as a result of the termination of his or her status as an employee of the Company or its affiliates. Thereafter, each Non-employee Director (including any Director who previously did not qualify as a Non-employee Director but who subsequently becomes a Non-employee Director) may be granted an option, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or a combination thereof from time to time (but in the case of any Non-employee Director who was granted an award pursuant to the preceding sentence, not earlier than the first fiscal year of the Company following the fiscal year of the Company in which such award was made pursuant to the preceding sentence) with a value (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not exceeding $475,000, which reflects an increase from $200,000 under the LTIP.

The Board of Directors also may provide that all or a portion of a Non-employee Director’s annual retainer and/or meeting fees shall be payable in the form of an award under the 2017 LTIP, provided that any such award shall have a value as of the date of grant (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not in excess of the annual retainer and/or meeting fee in respect of which it is made.

CHANGE IN CONTROL

Unless the applicable employment agreement provides otherwise, in the event that within 24 months of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2017 LTIP), the Company shall cease to employ the holder of an award due to a termination of employment by the Company other than for Cause or by the holder for Good Reason (as those terms are defined in the 2017 LTIP, or in any applicable employment agreement): (i) any award carrying a right to exercise that was not previously exercisable and vested shall become fully exercisable and vested, except that as to each award with respect to which performance goals are imposed, a pro rata portion of such award (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each performance period) shall become fully exercisable and vested as of the date of such termination, and any performance goals imposed with respect to awards shall be measured as of the date of such termination of employment; and (ii) the restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions, and forfeiture conditions applicable to any other award shall lapse and such awards shall be deemed fully vested, except that as to each award with respect to which performance goals are imposed, a pro rata portion of such award (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each performance period) shall be deemed fully vested and any performance goals imposed with respect to awards shall be measured as of the date of such termination of employment. Such acceleration may, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, also occur upon consummation of a change in control if any successor to the Company declines to assume or provide substitutes for the awards.

SPECIAL VESTING RULES

As noted above, the Committee in its sole discretion may condition the vesting or exercisability of any award granted under the 2017 LTIP on the attainment of pre-established performance goals.

In addition, notwithstanding any other provision of the 2017 LTIP, awards shall vest (i.e., become nonforfeitable) over a minimum period of one year; provided that (i) in the event of a Change in Control or the participant’s death

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

69

Table of Contents

Proposal 5: Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

or disability, no such minimum vesting period shall be required, (ii) awards to Non-employee Directors granted on the date of an annual meeting of shareholders of the Company may vest as early as the date of the subsequent annual meeting of the shareholders, and (iii) over the life of the 2017 LTIP up to 1,875,000 shares may be made subject to such awards without minimum vesting requirements (which number includes awards previously granted under the LTIP that required no such minimum vesting).

PROHIBITED ACTIONS

Without the approval of the shareholders of the Company, no action taken by the Committee (or any delegate of the Committee) under the 2017 LTIP shall have the effect of:

lowering the exercise or grant price of an option or stock appreciation right after it is granted;
canceling any previously granted option or stock appreciation right in exchange for another award if the exercise or grant price exceeds the fair market value of a share of our common stock, other than in connection with a reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company, a sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s property or one of its business units, the direct or indirect acquisition of all or substantially all of the outstanding voting shares of the Company, or any other change in control or recapitalization event; or
canceling in exchange for cash any previously granted award with an exercise or grant price exceeding the fair market value of a share of our common stock.

AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE 2017 LTIP

The Board of Directors may, at any time, suspend or terminate the 2017 LTIP or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever; provided, however, that shareholder approval shall be required (i) for any amendment to the 2017 LTIP that would have the effect of (A) increasing the number of shares available for issuance under the 2017 LTIP (other than in respect of changes in capitalization and similar events), (B) expanding the class of individuals eligible for participation in the 2017 LTIP, (C) materially increasing the benefits available to participants under the 2017 LTIP, or (D) lowering the exercise or grant price of an option or stock appreciation right after it is granted, and (ii) if and to the extent necessary to satisfy Sections 162(m) or 422 of the IRC, other applicable law or applicable stock exchange requirements. However, no action taken under the 2017 LTIP may, without the consent of a participant, adversely affect the participant’s rights under any outstanding award. No awards may be granted under the 2017 LTIP after February 13, 2027, but awards granted prior to that time will continue in effect after such time in accordance with their terms.

2017 LTIP BENEFITS

On March 1, 2017, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE was $72.98.

As of such date, stock options with respect to our Common Stock had been granted under the LTIP to the following individuals covering the number of shares shown:

Name and PositionNumber of Shares
Daniel P. Amos, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer1,818,551
Frederick J. Crawford, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer43,882
Kriss Cloninger III, President619,419
Paul S. Amos II, President, Aflac285,333
Eric M. Kirsch, Executive Vice President, Global Chief Investment Officer, Aflac147,481
Executive Officers as a Group3,687,606
Non-employee Directors as a Group281,146
Each Nominee for Election as a Director3,004,449
Each Associate of any of the Foregoing
Each Other Person Who Received at Least 5% of all Options Granted
All Employees as a Group (exclusive of Executive Officers)7,860,075

70

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Proposal 5: Proposal to Approve the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

The chart on page 59 may also have information that is relevant to consideration of this Proposal 5.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION

The following is a discussion of certain federal income tax effects currently applicable to stock options to be granted under the 2017 LTIP. The discussion is a summary only, and the applicable law is subject to change. Reference is made to the IRC and the guidance thereunder for a complete statement of all relevant federal tax provisions.

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS (“NSOs”)

An optionee generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an NSO. Rather, at the time of exercise of the NSO, the optionee will recognize ordinary income for income tax purposes in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over the exercise price. The Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction at such time and in the same amount that the optionee recognizes ordinary income.

If shares acquired upon exercise of an NSO are later sold or exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon the sale, exchange or disposition and the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise will generally be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee) depending upon the length of time the shares were held by the optionee.

INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS (“ISOs”)

An optionee will not recognize any ordinary income (and the Company will not be permitted any deduction) upon the grant or timely exercise of an ISO. However, the amount by which the fair market value of Common Stock on the exercise date of an ISO exceeds the purchase price generally will constitute an item which increases the optionee’s “alternative minimum taxable income.”

Exercise of an ISO will be timely if made during its term and if the optionee remains an employee of the Company or a subsidiary at all times during the period beginning on the date of grant of the ISO and ending on the date three months before the date of exercise (or one year before the date of exercise in the case of a disabled optionee, and without limit in the case of death). The tax consequences of an untimely exercise of an ISO will be determined in accordance with the rules applicable to NSOs, discussed above.

If stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of an ISO is later disposed of, and if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee, the optionee generally will recognize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss (depending upon the length of time the shares were held by the optionee) equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale and the exercise price. The Company, under these circumstances, will not be entitled to any income tax deduction in connection with either the exercise of the ISO or the sale of the stock by the optionee.

If, however, stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO is disposed of by the optionee prior to the expiration of two years from the date of grant of the ISO or within one year from the date the stock is transferred to him or her upon exercise (a “disqualifying disposition”), any gain realized by the optionee generally will be taxable at the time of the disqualifying disposition as follows: (i) at ordinary income rates to the extent of the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the stock on the date the ISO is exercised or the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition, and (ii) if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee, as short-term or long-term capital gain (depending upon the length of time the shares were held by the optionee) to the extent of any excess of the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition over the sum of the exercise price and any ordinary income recognized by the optionee. In such case, the Company may claim an income tax deduction at the time of the disqualifying disposition for the amount taxable to the optionee as ordinary income.


FOR
The Board of Directors recommends unanimously a vote“for”approval of the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated February 14, 2017).

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

71

Table of Contents

Proposal 6:Proposal to Approve an Amended and Restated 2018 Management Incentive Plan

The Company presently has in effect a Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) that was initially approved by the Board of Directors in 1985, and amended and restated in 1994, 1999, for years beginning 2004 and 2009 and, most recently, effective beginning 2013.

The Committee and the Board of Directors have approved an amendment and restatement of the MIP (as amended and restated, the “2018 Management Incentive Plan,” hereinafter referred to as the “2018 MIP”), subject to shareholder approval. You are being asked to approve the 2018 MIP, which includes approval of the performance goals for use under the 2018 MIP. If this proposal is not adopted, the MIP will expire at the end of 2017 and the 2018 MIP will be null and void.

Proposed Amendments

The Board of Directors’ principal purpose in adopting the 2018 MIP was to continue and to enhance the effectiveness of the MIP by extending the MIP through 2022 and modifying the circumstances under which the Committee may provide that the achievement of performance goals shall be determined.

If this proposal is adopted, the term of the MIP will be extended to the end of 2022. Awards outstanding upon expiration would remain in effect according to their terms. Absent extension, the MIP will expire at the end of 2017 (although, again, awards outstanding upon expiration would remain in effect according to their terms).

The 2018 MIP is designed to ensure that any compensation that may be payable under it may qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the IRC. As noted above in Proposal 5, Section 162(m) of the IRC generally denies deductions by an employer for compensation in excess of $1 million per year that is paid to “covered employees” (i.e., the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, other than the chief financial officer, serving at the end of the year). However, performance-based compensation is excluded from this deduction limit, provided that, among other requirements, the material terms pursuant to which the compensation is to be paid, including the employees eligible to receive the compensation, a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals are based and the maximum amount of compensation that could be paid to any covered employee, are disclosed to and approved by the shareholders in a separate vote prior to the payment. Accordingly, the 2018 MIP is being submitted to shareholders for approval at the Annual Meeting.

The 2018 MIP makes certain other changes to the MIP as described below.

If shareholders approve the 2018 MIP: it will take effect for performance awards, if any, payable with respect to performance periods commencing on or after January 1, 2018; no awards will be made under the existing MIP after 2017; and no awards will be made under the 2018 MIP after 2022 (although awards then outstanding will be settled in accordance with their terms).

Summary of the 2018 MIP

The description of the 2018 MIP summarized below is qualified, in its entirety, by reference to the text of the 2018 MIP as set forth in Appendix B.

The purposes of the 2018 MIP are to reinforce corporate, organizational and business-development goals; to promote the achievement of year-to-year and long-range financial and other business objectives; to directly tie a portion of participant compensation to the performance of the Company; and to reward the performance of individual officers and other employees in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievement. To this end, the 2018 MIP provides for the granting of performance awards to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (including employees who are also executive officers and Directors) who possess a capacity for contributing in substantial measure to the successful performance of the Company.

72

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Proposal 6: Proposal to Approve An Amended And Restated 2018 Management Incentive Plan

The 2018 MIP will be administered by the Committee. The Committee will (1) select the employees who participate in the 2018 MIP, (2) grant all awards under the 2018 MIP, (3) determine the duration of the performance period applicable to any award, (4) determine the terms and conditions, including the performance goals, of such awards (which need not be identical), (5) certify whether the performance goals have been attained, (6) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an award under the 2018 MIP may be settled, canceled, forfeited, or surrendered, (7) construe and interpret the 2018 MIP and awards thereunder, (8) make rules and regulations in connection with the administration and operation of the 2018 MIP, and (9) make all other determinations necessary or desirable in administering the 2018 MIP.

The Committee, in its sole discretion, will determine which employees will be eligible to receive awards under the 2018 MIP and what the terms of those awards will be. All of the employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (currently approximately 10,212 individuals) are potentially eligible for participation in the 2018 MIP. However, because no determination has yet been made concerning which employees will receive awards (if any) under the 2018 MIP or what their terms will be, the benefits to be provided under the 2018 MIP cannot be determined at this time.

The Committee may establish the performance period for any award as the fiscal year of the Company or, in the case of an employee who on the date of grant of the award is the Company’s chief investment officer (or the employee with duties typically reserved for a chief investment officer) or directly or indirectly reports to such employee, a period of one, two or three consecutive fiscal years. No employee during any fiscal year of the Company will be granted more than one award; however, to the extent the performance period under an award exceeds one year, any participant may be subject to multiple awards at any time (where, for example, awards with three-year performance periods are granted in consecutive years). In any event, the maximum amount that may become payable to an employee subject to the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the IRC for any fiscal year of the Company in respect of all awards whose performance period ends with or within such year is $9 million (the same limit that presently applies under the MIP).

The Committee will establish the performance goals that must be met during a performance period as a condition of receipt of awards under the 2018 MIP. The performance goals, which are the same as those as proposed for our Amended and Restated LTIP pursuant to Proposal 5, may include any or all of the following: new premium sales; premium income; investment income; revenues; total insurance benefits (cash claims, increase in future benefits and incurred but not reported claims); expense levels; premium payment levels; persistency rate (based on premiums or policies); policy renewals; profit margins; operating earnings (excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion the effects of one or more of the following items: realized gains or losses on investments, the impact from passive derivative activities and hedging, the change in fair value of the interest rate component of cross-currency swaps, and items considered by the Committee to be nonrecurring in nature, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by a state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, or items excluded from the presentation of operating earnings in the information filed or furnished by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time); net earnings (either before or after provision for the cumulative effect of required accounting changes for the applicable period); return on equity (operating earnings excluding the impact of foreign exchange divided by the average of common shareholders’ equity in the Company as of the beginning and end of the applicable period, excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion accumulated comprehensive income as recognized under ASC 320); new money investment yield; return on invested assets; shareholders’ equity; operating return on shareholders’ equity; regulatory capital levels; return on regulatory capital; risk-based capital levels or ratios; solvency margin ratio; stock price; total return to shareholders; or, to the extent an award is made to an individual who is not a covered employee under Section 162(m) of the IRC, such other performance goals as the Committee shall deem appropriate.

As determined by the Committee, achievement of performance goals under the 2018 MIP may be measured (a) individually, alternatively or in any combination, (b) with respect to the Company, a subsidiary, division, business unit or segment, product line, product, or any combination of the foregoing, (c) on an absolute basis, or relative to a target, to growth levels, to a designated comparison group, to results in other periods, to an index, or to other external measures, and (d) on an aggregate or per-share basis. Performance goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no award will be earned, levels of performance at which an award will become partially earned and a level at which an award will be fully earned. To the extent required to qualify payment under an award as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the IRC, awards whose vesting or exercise is conditioned on the attainment of performance goals shall become vested only after the attainment of such performance goals has been certified by the Committee. The Committee may provide that the achievement of performance goals shall be determined without regard to the impact of any event or occurrence

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

73

Table of Contents

Proposal 6: Proposal to Approve An Amended And Restated 2018 Management Incentive Plan

which the Committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by any state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, a change in accounting standards required by GAAP, items of an unusual or infrequently recurring nature, changes in applicable laws or regulations, or by excluding all or a portion of the effect of translating foreign currently of business segments to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes; provided that with respect to awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the IRC, the Committee shall not exercise any discretion with respect to such an award that would cause it to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation. With respect to participants who are not covered employees, performance goals under the 2018 MIP may also include such qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish; and with respect to participants who are covered employees, the Committee may, subject to attainment of performance goals under the 2018 MIP described above, impose additional qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish.

The Committee will specify the performance goals applicable to each award and, if applicable, minimum, target and maximum levels applicable to each performance goal. Awards may be expressed as a dollar amount or as a percentage of the participant’s “annual base salary.” For any year “annual base salary” means: (i) with respect to any executive officer, the annual rate of base salary of such executive officer in effect as of the first day of the applicable performance period (or, if an executive officer was not employed as of the first day of the applicable performance period, the annual rate of base salary in effect as of such executive officer’s first day of employment); and (ii) with respect to any other participant, unless otherwise determined by the Company, the annualized base salary paid to such participant in respect of the applicable performance period.

Awards will be paid to participants, in cash, within a reasonable period of time (but in any event within 2½ months) following the end of the period to which the awards relate. With respect to participants who are covered employees under Section 162(m) of the IRC, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, payment will be made only after achievement of the applicable performance goals has been certified by the Committee.

Unless an applicable employment agreement provides otherwise, in the event that within 24 months of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2018 MIP), the Company shall cease to employ a participant due to a termination of employment by the Company other than for Cause or by the participant for Good Reason (as those terms are defined in the 2018 MIP, or in any applicable employment agreement), any performance period ongoing at the time of such Change in Control will be deemed to have been completed, the maximum level of performance with respect to the applicable performance goals will be deemed to have been attained and a pro rata portion (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each performance period) of each outstanding award will become payable in cash to the participant. Such acceleration will also occur upon consummation of a Change in Control if any successor to the Company declines to assume and continue the awards.

The 2018 MIP may be amended, suspended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors or the Committee, provided, however, that no amendment that requires shareholder approval in order for the 2018 MIP to comply with Section 162(m) of the IRC will be effective unless the amendment is so approved, and no amendment may adversely affect any rights of a participant under an outstanding award without the participant’s consent.

The 2018 MIP will terminate at the end of the 2022 fiscal year, but payment with respect to all awards granted under the 2018 MIP before that time will be paid out in accordance with their terms.

As explained above, the benefits to be provided under the 2018 MIP cannot be determined at this time. However, non-equity incentive awards paid to the NEOs in respect of 2016 under the MIP, as in effect for that year, are noted in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table within this Proxy. Non-equity incentive awards paid to the executive officers as a whole (including the NEOs) under that plan in respect of 2016 totaled $14,910,994 and non-equity incentive awards paid to all other plan participants in respect of 2016 totaled $18,479,029. The Non-employee Director group will not be eligible to participate in the 2018 MIP.


FOR
The Board of Directors recommends unanimously a vote“for”approval of the amended and restated 2018 management incentive plan.

74

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Other Matters

The Board is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the 20172020 Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement. If any other matter should come before the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Committee intendspeople named in the accompanying proxy (or their substitutes) intend to vote the proxies in accordance with itstheir best judgment.

Submission of Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2018 Annual MeetingSUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING

Proposals for Inclusion in our 20182021 Proxy Materials

SEC rules permit shareholders to submit proposals to be included in our materials if the shareholder and the proposal satisfy the requirements specified in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act.Act of 1934. For a shareholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proposal must be received at the address provided below by November 17, 2017.19, 2020.

Director Nominations for Inclusion in our 20182021 Proxy Materials Pursuant to our Proxy Access Bylaw

Our proxy access Bylaw permits a shareholder (or a group of up to twenty shareholders) who owns shares of our outstanding capital stockCommon Stock representing at least 3% of the votes entitled to be cast on the election of directors,Directors, and who has owned such shares continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our proxy materials directorDirector candidates constituting up to 20% of the Board, if the nominating shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws. For the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, notice of a proxy access nomination must be received at the address provided below between October 18, 2017,20, 2020, and November 17, 2017.19, 2020.

Other Proposals or Director Nominations to be brought beforeBrought Before our 20182021 Annual Meeting

Our Bylaws set forth procedures for shareholders who wish to propose items of business or to nominate directorDirector candidates that are not intended to be included in our proxy materials. For the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, notice of such proposals or nominations must be received at the address provided below between January 1, 2018,4, 2021, and January 31, 2018.February 3, 2021. In the unlikely event the Company moves the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to a date that is more than 25 days before or after the date that is the one year anniversary of this year’s Annual Meeting date (i.e., May 1, 2018)4, 2020), the Company must receive such notice no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the meeting date is first mailed to shareholders or the Company makes a public announcement of the meeting date, whichever occurs first.

Address for Submission of Notices and Additional Information

All shareholder nominations of individuals for election as directorsDirectors or proposals of other items of business to be considered by shareholders at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (whether or not intended for inclusion in our proxy materials) must be submitted in writing to our Corporate Secretary at Aflac Incorporated, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999.

Both the proxy access and the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws require a shareholder’s notice of a nomination or other item of business to include certain information. Director nominees also must meet certain eligibility requirements. If you wish to introduce a nomination or other item of business, please review our Bylaws.

68      Aflac Incorporated


AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

75

Table of Contents

Other Matters|Annual Report

Annual ReportANNUAL REPORT

The Company has delivered a copy of its 20172019 Annual Report on Form 10-K to each shareholder entitled to vote at the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. For a copy, write to:

David A. Young


Vice President, Investor and Rating Agency Relations


Aflac Incorporated


Worldwide Headquarters


1932 Wynnton Road


Columbus, Georgia 31999

Exercise Your Right to VoteEXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE

The Company encourages you to vote. Please vote by internet or telephone, or sign, date, and return your proxy or voting instruction form in the prepaid envelope you received if you requested paper copies of our proxy materials. We encourage you to attend our 20172020 Annual Meeting on May 1, 2017.4, 2020. To ensure that attendance is limited to shareholders and their proxies or qualified representatives, if you are not a registered shareholder, please bring with you proof of Common Stock ownership, such as a current brokerage statement, and a form of identification bearing your photograph.photo ID. If you are attending the Annual Meeting as a proxy or qualified representative of a shareholder, please bring a form of identification bearing your photographphoto ID and written evidence of your authority to act on behalf of the shareholder. Cameras, cellphones, and other electronic or recording devices may not be used in the meeting room.

By order of the Board of Directors,


J. Matthew Loudermilk


Secretary


March 17, 201719, 2020

2020 Proxy Statement      69


76

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

Appendix A – Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan

(As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017)

1.  Purpose; Establishment.

This Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan is intended to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing officers and other employees of the Company or its Affiliates with appropriate incentives and rewards to encourage them to enter into and continue in the employ of the Company or its Affiliates and to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company; to compensate the Company’s Non-employee Directors and provide incentives to such Non-employee Directors that are directly linked to increases in stock value; and to reward the performance of individual officers, other employees, and Non-employee Directors in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievements.

The Plan was originally adopted and approved by the Board of Directors on February 10, 2004, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders. The Plan was thereafter amended in certain respects from time to time and was adopted and approved by the Board of Directors on February 14, 2017 as an amended and restated Plan titled the “Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan,” subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders.

2.  Definitions.

As used in the Plan, the following definitions apply to the terms indicated below:

“Affiliate” means an affiliate of the Company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

“Agreement” shall mean the written agreement between the Company and a Participant evidencing an Award.

“Acquiring Entity” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(d) hereof.

“Award” shall mean any Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Stock Appreciation Right or Dividend Equivalent granted pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

“Board of Directors” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

“Cause” shall mean, unless a Participant is a party to a written employment agreement with the Company or an Affiliate which contains a definition of “cause,” “good cause,” “termination for cause,” or any other similar term or phrase, in which case “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in such agreement, that in the sole discretion of the Committee the Participant has engaged in conduct involving one or more of the following:

(i)the substantial and continuing failure of the Participant to render services to the Company or any Affiliate in accordance with the Participant’s obligations and position with the Company or Affiliate;
(ii)dishonesty, gross negligence, or breach of fiduciary duty by the Participant;
(iii)the commission by the Participant of an act of fraud or embezzlement, as found by a court of competent jurisdiction;
(iv)the conviction of the Participant of or plea by the Participant of guilty or nolo contendre to a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude; or
(v)a material breach by the Participant of the terms of an agreement with the Company or any Affiliate, provided that the Company or Affiliate provides the Participant with adequate notice of such breach and the Participant fails to cure such breach, if the breach is reasonably curable, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice.

A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred upon the happening of the earliest to occur of the following:

(i)any “person,” as such term is used in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (1) the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, (2) any trustee

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

77

Table of Contents

Appendix A

or other fiduciary holding securities under a benefit plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (3) any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (4) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Company Stock), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates) representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities;

(ii)individuals who, as of May 1, 2017, constitute the Board of Directors, and any new director (other than an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company) whose election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof;
(iii)there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than (A) a merger or consolidation which would result in the “beneficial owners” (as hereinabove defined) of the securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving or parent entity), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the combined voting power of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation, or (B) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no “person” (as hereinabove defined), directly or indirectly, acquires more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities (not including any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates); or
(iv)the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (or any transaction having a similar effect), other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, at least 75% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition, “Change in Control” with respect to any Award shall mean a Change in Control as defined in any employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Participant, if different from the foregoing and applicable to Awards under the Plan; and if all or a portion of an Award constitutes deferred compensation under Section 409A and such Award (or portion thereof) is to be settled, distributed or paid on an accelerated basis due to a Change in Control event that is not a “change in control event” described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) or successor guidance, then if such settlement, distribution or payment would result in additional tax under Section 409A, such Award (or the portion thereof) shall vest at the time of the Change in Control (provided such accelerated vesting will not result in additional tax under Section 409A), but settlement, distribution or payment, as the case may be, shall not be accelerated.

“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or any subcommittee thereof formed to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code or Rule 16b-3.

“Company” shall mean Aflac Incorporated, a Georgia corporation, and any successor thereto.

“Company Stock” shall mean the common stock of the Company, par value $0.10 per share.

“Corporate Transaction” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(d) hereof.

78

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

“Covered Employee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.

“Disability” shall mean (i) any physical or mental condition that would qualify a Participant for a disability benefit under any long-term disability plan maintained by the Company (or by any Affiliate by which he is employed); or (ii) when used in connection with the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option following termination of employment, disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition, “Disability” with respect to any Award shall mean a Disability as defined in the Agreement relating to such Award if different from the foregoing. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition, to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of a tax under Section 409A, no event that would be a Disability under the foregoing provision of this definition shall be treated as a Disability in respect of a Participant unless the Participant shall also be treated as “disabled” within the meaning of Section 409A.

“Dividend Equivalent” means an amount credited pursuant to Section 9(d) hereof, equal to the dividends paid with respect to a specified number of shares of Company Stock.

“Effective Date” shall mean the date the Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders.

“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

“Fair Market Value” of a share of Company Stock, as of a date of determination, shall mean (1) in regard to any Award the closing price per share or alternatively, if the Committee so determines in its sole discretion, the average of the high and low sales prices per share of Company Stock on the national securities exchange or national market system on which such stock is principally traded on such date or, if such date is not a trading day, on the last preceding date that was a trading day, or (2) if shares of Company Stock are not then listed on a national securities exchange or national market system, or the value of such shares is not otherwise determinable, such value as determined by the Committee in good faith. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A in order to avoid the imposition of penalties or interest in respect thereof, Fair Market Value shall be determined in a manner consistent with Section 409A.

“Good Reason” shall mean, unless a Participant is a party to a written employment agreement with the Company or an Affiliate which contains a definition of “good reason” or any other similar term or phrase, in which case “Good Reason” shall have the meaning set forth in such agreement, the termination of employment by a Participant upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events to the extent that there is, or would be if not corrected, a material negative change in the Participant’s employment relationship with the Company:

(i)A material reduction of the Participant’s base salary;
(ii)A significant diminution of the Participant’s duties and responsibilities;
(iii)The relocation of the Company’s principal office or of Participant’s own office to any place beyond twenty-five (25) miles from the current principal office of the Company in Columbus, Georgia, or the Participant’s own office, respectively, without the Participant’s consent; and

provided, that a Participant shall have Good Reason under this Plan only if (A) the Participant provides the Company, within ninety (90) days of the occurrence of the event giving rise to the notice, a written notice indicating the specific Good Reason provision(s) in this Plan relied upon, setting forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for Good Reason, and indicating a date of termination of employment (not less than thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days after the date such notice is given); and (B) such facts and circumstances are not substantially corrected by the Company prior to the date of termination specified by the Participant in such notice. Any failure by the Participant to set forth in a notice of Good Reason any facts or circumstances which contribute to the showing of Good Reason shall not waive any right of the Participant hereunder or preclude the Participant from asserting such fact or circumstances in enforcing his or her rights hereunder.

“Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and that is not designated by the Committee as other than such an incentive stock option.

“Non-employee Director” shall mean a member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of the Company or its Affiliates.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

79

Table of Contents

Appendix A

“Nonqualified Stock Option” shall mean an Option other than an Incentive Stock Option.

“Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Company Stock granted pursuant to Section 7 hereof (and, with respect to a Non-employee Director, pursuant to Section 12 hereof).

“Participant” shall mean an employee of the Company or an Affiliate or Non-employee Director to whom an Award is granted pursuant to the Plan, or upon the death of the employee or Non-employee Director, his or her successors, heirs, executors and administrators, as the case may be.

“Plan” shall mean the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan.

“Restricted Stock” shall mean a share of Company Stock which is granted pursuant to the terms of Section 8 hereof and which is subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 8(d) hereof.

“Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean the right, granted pursuant to Section 9, to receive shares of Company Stock.

“Rule 16b-3” shall mean the Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time.

“Section 409A” shall mean Section 409A of the Code and all applicable regulations and guidance issued thereunder.

“Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended from time to time.

“Separation from Service” or “Separate from Service” shall mean a separation from service as defined in Section 409A.

“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” shall mean the right, granted pursuant to Section 10, to receive shares of Company Stock.

“Subsidiary” shall mean a “subsidiary corporation” within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code.

“Vesting Date” shall mean the date established by the Committee on which a share of Restricted Stock or a Restricted Stock Unit shall vest.

3. Stock Subject to the Plan.

(a)Shares Available for Awards.The maximum number of shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be 37,500,000 shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof). Such shares may be authorized but unissued Company Stock or authorized and issued Company Stock held in the Company’s treasury. No more than 24,500,000 shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof) of Company Stock may be awarded under the Plan in the aggregate in respect of Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.
(b)Individual Limitation.The total number of shares of Company Stock subject to Awards granted to any Participant in any fiscal year of the Company shall not exceed 1,500,000 (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof).
(c)Adjustment for Change in Capitalization.In the event that any dividend or other distribution is declared (whether in the form of cash, Company Stock, or other property), or there occurs any recapitalization, Company Stock split, reverse Company Stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event, if the Committee determines that it is appropriate to do so, (i) the number and kind of shares of Company Stock which may thereafter be issued in connection with Awards, (ii) the number and kind of shares of Company Stock issued or issuable in respect of outstanding Awards, (iii) the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any Award, and (iv) the maximum number of shares subject to Awards which may be awarded to any Participant during any fiscal year of the Company and the number of Options granted pursuant to Section 12(a)(i) hereof shall be equitably adjusted as necessary to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants without change in the aggregate purchase price; provided that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, such adjustment shall be made in accordance with Section 424 of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any actions taken under this Section 3(c) shall be made in a manner

80

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

consistent with Section 409A, including without limitation any restrictions with regard to the adjustment of stock options and stock appreciation rights that are considered exempt from Section 409A.

(d)Substitution for Awards.In the event of (i) a liquidation of the Company, (ii) a reorganization, merger, or consolidation of the Company as a result of which the outstanding Company Stock is changed into or exchanged for cash or property or securities not of the Company’s issue, (iii) a sale, exchange, or transfer of all or substantially all of the property of the Company, or one of its business units, to another person or corporation, (iv) the direct or indirect acquisition of all or substantially all of the outstanding voting shares of the Company by another person, corporation or other entity, or (v) any other Change in Control (any such event, a “Corporate Transaction”), the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, arrange with the surviving entity, continuing successor, or purchasing corporation or other entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiring Entity”), for the Acquiring Entity to assume the Company’s rights and obligations under outstanding Awards or substitute Awards based on the Acquiring Entity’s stock for such outstanding Awards. To the extent the Acquiring Entity elects not to assume the Company’s rights and obligations under or substitute for such outstanding Awards, the Board of Directors (as constituted prior to any Change in Control resulting from such Corporate Transaction) may, in its sole discretion, determine the subsequent treatment of each outstanding Award, which may include (but is not limited to) providing that any such Awards shall become fully exercisable and free of restrictions, as applicable, as of a date prior to such Corporate Transaction, as the Board so determines. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any actions taken under this Section 3(d) shall be made in a manner consistent with Section 409A, including without limitation any restrictions with regard to the adjustment of stock options and stock appreciation rights that are considered exempt from Section 409A.
(e)Reuse of Shares.If any shares of Company Stock subject to an Award are forfeited, canceled, exchanged, or surrendered or if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares, the shares subject to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, termination or expiration, again be available for issuance in connection with future Awards granted under the Plan. However, shares of Company Stock subject to an Award under the Plan shall not again be made available for issuance or delivery under the Plan if such shares are:
(i)shares tendered in payment for an Option;
(ii)shares delivered or withheld by the Company or the Participant to satisfy any tax withholding obligation; or
(iii)shares covered by a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right that were not issued upon the settlement of the Award

4. Administration of the Plan.

(a)In General.The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority in its sole discretion, subject to and not inconsistent with the express provisions of the Plan, to administer the Plan and to exercise all the powers and authorities either specifically granted to it under the Plan or necessary or advisable in the administration of the Plan, including, without limitation, the authority to grant Awards; to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards shall be granted; to determine the type and number of Awards to be granted, the number of shares of Company Stock to which an Award may relate and the terms, conditions, restrictions and performance criteria relating to any Award; to determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an Award may be settled, canceled, forfeited, exchanged, or surrendered; to make adjustments in the performance goals in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles; to construe and interpret the Plan and any Award; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including without limitation, rules and regulations relating to leaves of absence and changes from an employee to a service provider or consultant and vice versa; to determine the terms and provisions of Agreements; and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

81

Table of Contents

Appendix A

(b)Prohibited Actions.Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, without the approval of the shareholders of the Company, no action taken by the Committee (or any delegate of the Committee) shall have the effect of:
(i)lowering the exercise or grant price of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right after it is granted;
(ii)canceling any previously granted Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for another Award if the exercise price of such Option or the grant price of such Stock Appreciation Right exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a Change in Control or pursuant to Section 3(c) or 3(d) herein; or
(iii)canceling in exchange for cash any previously granted Option or Stock Appreciation Right with an exercise or grant price in excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date of such cancellation.
(c)Acceleration of Awards.The Committee may, in its sole discretion, without amendment to the Plan, in the event of a Participant’s death, Disability or retirement, (i) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the exercise of any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted to the Participant, waive or amend the operation of Plan provisions respecting exercise after termination of employment or otherwise adjust any of the terms of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right, and (ii) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the vesting of any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit granted to the Participant or otherwise adjust any of the terms applicable to any such Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any actions taken under this Section 4(c) shall be made in a manner consistent with Section 409A, including without limitation any restrictions with regard to the adjustment of stock options and stock appreciation rights that are considered exempt from Section 409A.
(d)Delegation of Authority.Except as required by Rule 16b-3 with respect to grants of Awards to individuals who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or as otherwise required for compliance with Rule 16b-3 or other applicable law, or as required to qualify an Award as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code where such qualification is intended, the Committee may delegate all or any part of its authority under the Plan (other than the authority described in Section 4(c) hereof) to an employee, employees or committee of employees of the Company.
(e)Effect of Committee Decisions.All decisions made by the Committee (or its designee pursuant to Section 4(d) hereof) pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including without limitation the Company and the Participants. No member of the Board of Directors or the Committee, nor any officer or employee of the Company or its Affiliates acting on behalf of the Board of Directors or the Committee, shall be personally liable for any action, determination, or interpretation taken or made in good faith with respect to the Plan, and all members of the Board of Directors or the Committee and each and any officer or employee of the Company or its Affiliates acting on their behalf shall, to the extent permitted by law, be fully indemnified and protected by the Company in respect of any such action, determination or interpretation.

5.  Eligibility.

The persons who shall be eligible to receive Awards pursuant to the Plan shall be such employees of the Company or its Affiliates (including officers of the Company, whether or not they are directors of the Company) and Non-employee Directors, in each case as the Committee shall select from time to time. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, employees shall include prospective employees to whom Awards are granted in connection with an offer of future employment with the Company or its Affiliates (and any such prospective employee who thereafter enters into employment with the Company or its Affiliates shall be treated as a Participant hereunder). The grant of an Award hereunder in any year to any employee or Non-employee Director shall not entitle such person to a grant of an Award in any future year, except as contemplated by Section 12 hereof.

82

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

6.  Awards Under the Plan; Agreement.

(a)Awards Generally.The Committee may grant Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Stock Appreciation Rights in such amounts and with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine, subject to Section 6(b) hereof and the other provisions of the Plan.
(b)Non-employee Directors.Awards to Non-employee Directors shall be made exclusively in accordance with Section 12 hereof.
(c)Agreement.Each Award granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Agreement which shall contain such provisions as the Committee may in its sole discretion deem necessary or desirable and which are not in conflict with the terms of the Plan. By accepting an Award, a Participant thereby agrees that the Award shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Agreement.
(d)Special Vesting Requirements.Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan (but except as otherwise provided in this Section 6(d)), Awards (including, without limitation, each Award with respect to which performance goals are imposed) shall vest (i.e., become nonforfeitable) over a minimum period of one year; provided that (i) in the event of a Change in Control or, in respect of such an Award to any Participant, in the event of the Participant’s death, or Disability, no such minimum vesting period shall be required, (ii) an Award pursuant to Section 12 hereof granted on the date of an annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company may vest as early as the date of the subsequent annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, and (iii) over the life of the Plan up to 1,875,000 shares of Company Stock may be made subject to such Awards without minimum vesting requirements.

7.  Options.

(a)Identification of Options.Each Option shall be clearly identified in the applicable Agreement as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted only with respect to “service recipient stock” as such term is used in Section 409A.
(b)Exercise Price.Each Agreement with respect to an Option shall set forth the amount (the “option exercise price”) payable by the grantee to the Company upon exercise of the Option. The option exercise price per share shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the option exercise price shall in no event be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date the Option is granted.
(c)Term and Exercise of Options.
(i)Options shall become exercisable over the exercise period determined by the Committee. The Committee shall determine the expiration date of each Option; provided, however, that no Option shall be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant.
(ii)If any Option is exercisable in the amount of 100 or more full shares of Company Stock, the Company shall not be obligated to permit the partial exercise of such exercisable Option for less than 100 full shares.
(iii)An Option shall be exercised by delivering notice as specified in the Agreement on the form of notice provided by the Company. Payment for shares of Company Stock purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall be made on the effective date of such exercise by one or a combination of the following means:
(A)in cash or by personal check, certified check, bank cashier’s check or wire transfer;
(B)in shares of Company Stock owned by the Participant valued at their Fair Market Value on the effective date of such exercise; or
(C)by any such other methods as the Committee may from time to time authorize. In the case of a Participant who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Company may require that the method of making such payment be in compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

83

Table of Contents

Appendix A

(iv)Subject to an agreement between a Participant and the Company to the contrary, certificates for shares of Company Stock purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall be issued in the name of or for the account of the Participant or other person entitled to receive such shares, and delivered to the Participant or such other person as soon as practicable following the date on which the Option is exercised.
(d)Limitations on Incentive Stock Options.
(i)To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of shares of Company Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year under the Plan and any other stock option plan of the Company or a Subsidiary shall exceed $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. Such Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the date on which each such Incentive Stock Option is granted.
(ii)No Incentive Stock Option may be granted to an individual if, at the time of the proposed grant, such individual owns (or is deemed to own under the Code) stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company unless (A) the exercise price of such Incentive Stock Option is at least one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock at the time such Incentive Stock Option is granted and (B) such Incentive Stock Option is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date such Incentive Stock Option is granted.
(e)Effect of Termination of Employment.
(i)In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and its Affiliates shall terminate for any reason other than (i) Cause, (ii) death, or (iii) Disability, the Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they are exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable for such period as may be provided in the Agreement, but in no event following the expiration of its term. The treatment of any Option that is unexercisable as of the date of termination shall be as set forth in the Agreement.
(ii)In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and its Affiliates shall terminate on account of the death or Disability of the Participant, Options granted to such Participant that are outstanding and exercisable as of the date of death or Disability shall remain exercisable, as the case may be, by the Participant or the Participant’s legal representatives, heirs or legatees for such period as may be provided in the Agreement, but in no event following the expiration of its term. The treatment of any Option that is unexercisable as of the date of termination shall be as set forth in the Agreement.
(iii)In the event of the termination of a Participant’s employment or service for Cause, all outstanding Options granted to such Participant shall expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination.
(iv)The Committee in its sole discretion may vary any of the provisions of this Section 7(e).

8.  Restricted Stock.

(a)Price.At the time of the grant of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee shall determine the price (if any), which, to the extent required by law, shall not be less than the par value of a share of Company Stock, to be paid by the Participant for each share of Restricted Stock subject to the Award.
(b)Vesting Date.At the time of the grant of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee shall establish a Vesting Date or Vesting Dates with respect to such shares. The Committee may divide such shares into classes and assign a different Vesting Date for each class. Provided that all conditions to the vesting of a share of Restricted Stock imposed pursuant to Section 8(c) are satisfied, and except as provided in Section 8(h), upon the occurrence of the Vesting Date with respect to a share of Restricted Stock, such share shall vest and the restrictions of Section 8(d) shall lapse.
(c)Conditions to Vesting.At the time of the grant of shares of Restricted Stock, the Committee may impose such restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such shares as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
(d)Restrictions on Transfer Prior to Vesting.Unless the Committee determines otherwise, prior to the vesting of a share of Restricted Stock, no transfer of a Participant’s rights with respect to such share, whether

84

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

voluntary or involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, shall be permitted. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, immediately upon any attempt to transfer such rights, such share, and all of the rights related thereto, shall be forfeited by the Participant.

(e)Dividends on Restricted Stock.Dividends on Restricted Stock shall be payable at the time and pursuant to the payment schedule, or reinvested in shares of Company Stock, as specified by the Committee at the time of grant in the Agreement relating to such Award, subject to the requirements of Section 409A to the extent applicable, or, if the Committee does not provide a time and schedule of payment at the time of grant, any dividends shall be payable in a lump sum on the date the dividend on Company Stock is payable to shareholders generally.
(f)Issuance of Certificates.Reasonably promptly after the date of grant with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall cause to be issued a stock certificate (or make a book entry transfer), registered in the name of or for the account of the Participant to whom such shares were granted, evidencing such shares. Each such stock certificate and book entry statement shall bear a legend substantially in the following form:

The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the restrictions, terms and conditions (including forfeiture provisions and restrictions against transfer) contained in the Aflac Incorporated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and an Agreement entered into between the registered owner of such shares and the Company. A copy of the Plan and Agreement is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Company, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, GA 31999.

Such legend shall not be removed until such shares vest pursuant to the terms hereof. Unless the Committee provides otherwise, any stock certificates evidencing Restricted Stock granted hereunder shall be held in the custody of the Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and, as a condition to the grant of any award of Restricted Stock, the Participant shall deliver to the Company a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the shares of Company Stock covered by such Award.

(g)Consequences of Vesting.Upon the vesting of a share of Restricted Stock pursuant to the terms hereof, the restrictions of Section 8(d) shall lapse with respect to such share. Reasonably promptly after a share of Restricted Stock vests, the Company shall cause to be delivered to the Participant to whom such shares were granted a certificate evidencing such share, free of the legend set forth in Section 8(f).
(h)Effect of Termination of Employment.
(i)Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Agreement, upon the termination of a Participant’s employment or service for any reason other than Cause, any and all unvested shares of Restricted Stock shall be immediately forfeited by the Participant and transferred to, and reacquired by, the Company. In the event of a forfeiture of shares pursuant to this Section 8(h), the Company shall repay to the Participant (or the Participant’s estate) any amount paid by the Participant for such shares, without interest. In the event that the Company requires a return of shares, it shall also have the right to require the return of all dividends paid on such shares, other than dividends actually paid to the Participant in cash, whether by termination of any escrow arrangement under which such dividends are held or otherwise.
(ii)In the event of the termination of a Participant’s employment or service for Cause, all shares of Restricted Stock granted to such Participant which had not vested as of the date of such termination shall immediately be forfeited and returned to the Company, together with any dividends paid on such shares, other than dividends actually paid to the Participant in cash, in return for which the Company shall repay to the Participant any amount paid by the Participant for such shares, without interest.

9.  Restricted Stock Units.

(a)Vesting Date.At the time of the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee shall establish a Vesting Date or Vesting Dates with respect to such units. The Committee may divide such units into classes and assign a different Vesting Date for each class. Provided that all conditions to the vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit imposed pursuant to Section 9(c) are satisfied, and except as provided in Section 9(e), upon the occurrence of the Vesting Date with respect to a Restricted Stock Unit, such unit shall vest.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

85

Table of Contents

Appendix A

(b)Issuance of Shares.No shares of Company Stock (or other property) shall be issued at the time Restricted Stock Units are granted. Upon the lapse or waiver of restrictions and the restricted period relating to Restricted Stock Units and no later than 30 days thereafter (or at such later time as may be determined by the Committee and specified at the time of grant in the Agreement relating to such Award, in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A to the extent applicable), shares of Company Stock shall be issued to the holder of the Restricted Stock Units and evidenced in such manner as the Committee may deem appropriate, including book-entry registration or issuance of one or more stock certificates.
(c)Conditions to Vesting.At the time of the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee may impose such restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such units as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, to be contained in the Agreement.
(d)Dividend Equivalents.Dividend Equivalents shall be credited to a Participant in respect of Restricted Stock Units held by the Participant. Such Dividend Equivalents shall be converted into additional Restricted Stock Units by dividing (i) the aggregate amount or value of the dividends paid with respect to that number of shares of Company Stock equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units then credited by (ii) the Fair Market Value per share of Company Stock on the payment date for such dividend. The additional Restricted Stock Units credited by reason of such Dividend Equivalents shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Unit to which they relate.
(e)Effect of Termination of Employment.Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Agreement, Restricted Stock Units that have not vested, and any Dividend Equivalents credited to such Restricted Stock Units, shall be forfeited upon the Participant’s termination of employment for any reason.

10.  Stock Appreciation Rights.

(a)Grant of SARs.The Committee may grant SARs in such number and on such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion.
(b)Grant Price.The grant price of an SAR shall be established by the Committee and shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date of grant of the SAR.
(c)Exercise.SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes upon them.
(d)Term of SARs.The term of an SAR granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, provided that such term shall not exceed ten (10) years.
(e)Payment of SAR Amount.Upon exercise of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(i)the difference between the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date of exercise over the grant price; by
(ii)the number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which the SAR is exercised.

The payment upon SAR exercise shall be made in shares of Company Stock of equivalent value (determined on the basis of their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise).

11.  Special Vesting Rules.

(a)Performance Vesting.The Committee in its sole discretion may condition the vesting or exercisability of any Award granted under the Plan on the attainment of performance goals that are pre-established by the Committee and that are based, for any period specified by the Committee in its sole discretion, on one or more of the following criteria: new premium sales; premium income; investment income; revenues; total insurance benefits (cash claims, increase in future benefits and incurred but not reported claims); expense levels; premium payment levels; persistency rate (based on premiums or policies); policy renewals; profit margins; operating earnings (excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion the effects of one or more of the following items: realized gains or losses on investments, the impact from passive derivative activities

86

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

and hedging, the change in fair value of the interest rate component of cross-currency swaps, and items considered by the Committee to be nonrecurring in nature such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by a state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, or items excluded from the presentation of operating earnings in the information filed or furnished by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time); net earnings (either before or after provision for the cumulative effect of required accounting changes for the applicable period); return on equity (operating earnings excluding the impact of foreign exchange divided by the average of common shareholders’ equity in the Company as of the beginning and end of the applicable period, excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion accumulated comprehensive income as recognized under ASC 320); new money investment yield; return on invested assets; shareholders’ equity; operating return on shareholders’ equity; regulatory capital levels; return on regulatory capital; risk-based capital levels or ratios; solvency margin ratio; stock price; total return to shareholders; or, to the extent an Award is made to an individual who is not a Covered Employee, such other performance goals as the Committee shall deem appropriate. As determined by the Committee, achievement of the performance goals may be measured (a) individually, alternatively or in any combination, (b) with respect to the Company, a subsidiary, division, business unit or segment, product line, product, or any combination of the foregoing, (c) on an absolute basis, or relative to a target, to growth levels, to a designated comparison group, to results in other periods, to an index, or to other external measures, and (d) on an aggregate or per-share basis. Performance goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no Award will be earned, levels of performance at which an Award will become partially earned and a level at which an Award will be fully earned. To the extent required to qualify payment under an Award as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, Awards whose vesting or exercise is conditioned on the attainment of performance goals shall become vested or exercisable (as the case may be) only after the attainment of such performance goals has been certified by the Committee. The Committee may provide that the achievement of performance goals shall be determined without regard to the impact of any event or occurrence which the Committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by any state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, a change in accounting standards required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), items of an unusual or infrequently recurring nature, changes in applicable laws or regulations, or by excluding all or a portion of the effect of translating foreign currently of business segments to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes; provided that with respect to Awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), the Committee shall not exercise any discretion with respect to such an Award that would cause it to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation. With respect to Participants who are not Covered Employees, Performance Goals may also include such qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish; and with respect to Participants who are Covered Employees, the Committee may, subject to attainment of Performance Goals described above, impose additional qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish.

(b)Change in Control.Unless an employment agreement between the Company or an Affiliate and the Participant provides otherwise, but in any event subject to the provisions of Section 3(d) hereof, in the event that within 24 months of a Change in Control, the Company shall cease to employ the Participant due to a termination of employment other than by (i) the Company for Cause, or (ii) the Participant without Good Reason, then:
(i)any Award carrying a right to exercise that was not previously exercisable and vested shall become fully exercisable and vested, except that as to each Award with respect to which performance goals are imposed, a pro rata portion of such Award (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each performance period) shall become fully exercisable and vested as of the date of such termination, and any performance goals imposed with respect to Awards shall be measured as of the date of such termination of employment; and
(ii)the restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions, and forfeiture conditions applicable to any other Award granted under the Plan shall lapse and such Awards shall be deemed fully vested, except that as to each Award with respect to which performance goals are imposed, a pro rata portion of such Award (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each performance

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

87

Table of Contents

Appendix A

period) shall be deemed fully vested and any performance goals imposed with respect to Awards shall be measured as of the date of such termination of employment.

12. Non-employee Director Awards.

No Awards shall be granted under the Plan to Non-employee Directors except as provided in this Section 12.

(a)Annual Awards.Awards shall (or in the case of clause (ii), below, may) be granted to Non-employee Directors as provided in the following provisions of this Section 12(a) and otherwise on the same terms and conditions as apply under the other provisions of this Plan, provided that with respect to such Awards, the Board of Directors (exclusive of the Non-employee Director to whom the Award is granted) shall perform the functions otherwise reserved to the Committee under the Plan.
(i)Each person who first becomes a Non-employee Director on or after the Effective Date shall be granted on the date such person first becomes a Non-employee Director either a Nonqualified Stock Option, a Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, or a combination thereof, in any event having a value as of the date of grant (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not in excess of the value of an Option covering an aggregate of 10,000 shares of Company Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof); provided, however, that no such Award shall be granted to a director who previously did not qualify as a Non-employee Director but subsequently becomes a Non-employee Director solely as a result of the termination of his or her status as an employee of the Company or its Affiliates.
(ii)Each Non-employee Director (including any director who previously did not qualify as a Non-employee Director but who subsequently becomes a Non-employee Director) may be granted Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, or a combination thereof from time to time (but in the case of any Non-employee Director who was granted an Award pursuant to clause (i), above, not earlier than the first fiscal year of the Company following the fiscal year of the Company in which such Award was made pursuant to clause (i), above) with a value as of the date of grant (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not in excess of $475,000.
(b)Awards in Lieu of Fees.The Board of Directors may provide that all or a portion of a Non-employee Director’s annual retainer and/or meeting fees shall be payable in the form of an Award on the same terms and conditions as apply to Awards under the other provisions of this Plan, provided that any such Award shall have a value as of the date of grant (as reasonably determined in good faith by the Board of Directors or its designee) not in excess of the annual retainer and/or meeting fee in respect of which it is made.

13. Rights as a Shareholder.

No person shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares of Company Stock covered by or relating to any Award until the date of issuance of a stock certificate with respect to such shares. Except as otherwise expressly provided in Section 3(c), no adjustment to any Award shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date occurs prior to the date such stock certificate is issued.

14. No Employment Rights.

Nothing contained in the Plan or any Agreement shall confer upon any Participant any right with respect to the continuation of employment by or performance of services for the Company or its Affiliates or interfere in any way with the right of the Company or its Affiliates, subject to the terms of any separate employment or other agreement to the contrary, at any time to terminate such employment or service or to increase or decrease the compensation of the Participant.

15. Securities Matters.

(a)Registration and Delivery of Shares.Neither the Company nor its Affiliates shall be under any obligation to effect the registration pursuant to the Securities Act of any interests in the Plan or any shares of Company Stock to be issued hereunder or to effect similar compliance under any state laws. Notwithstanding anything

88

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be obligated to cause to be issued or delivered any certificates evidencing shares of Company Stock pursuant to the Plan unless and until the Company is advised by its counsel that the issuance and delivery of such certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authority and the requirements of any securities exchange on which shares of Company Stock are traded. The Committee may require, as a condition of the issuance and delivery of certificates evidencing shares of Company Stock pursuant to the terms hereof, that the recipient of such shares make such agreements and representations, and that such certificates bear such legends (including without limitation regarding restrictions on transferability), as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or desirable.

(b)Limitations on Transfer.The transfer of any shares of Company Stock hereunder shall be effective only at such time as counsel to the Company shall have determined that the issuance and delivery of such shares is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authority and the requirements of any securities exchange on which shares of Company Stock are traded. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, defer the effectiveness of any transfer of shares of Company Stock hereunder in order to allow the issuance of such shares to be made pursuant to registration or an exemption from registration or other methods for compliance available under federal or state securities laws. The Committee shall inform the Participant in writing of its decision to defer the effectiveness of a transfer. During the period of such deferral in connection with the exercise of an Option or SAR, the Participant may, by written notice, withdraw such exercise and obtain the refund of any amount paid with respect thereto.

16. Withholding Taxes.

Whenever cash is to be paid pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to deduct therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and local tax withholding requirements related thereto. Whenever shares of Company Stock are to be delivered pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to require the Participant to remit to the Company in cash an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state and local tax withholding requirements related thereto. Unless the Committee provides otherwise in an Agreement, a Participant may satisfy the foregoing requirement by electing to have the Company withhold from delivery shares of Company Stock or by delivering shares of Company Stock already owned by the Participant, in each case, having a value equal to the minimum amount of tax required to be withheld (valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined). Such an election may be made with respect to all or any portion of the shares to be delivered pursuant to an Award, provided that fractional share amounts shall be settled in cash.

17. Notification of Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code.

If any Participant shall, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Company Stock under the Plan, make the election permitted under Section 83(b) of the Code, such Participant shall notify the Secretary of the Company of such election within ten (10) days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service.

18. Notification Upon Disqualifying Disposition.

Each Participant shall notify the Secretary of the Company of any disposition of shares of Company Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option under the circumstances described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), within ten (10) days of such disposition.

19. Amendment or Termination of the Plan.

The Board of Directors may, at any time, suspend or terminate the Plan or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever; provided, however, that shareholder approval shall be required (i) for any amendment to the Plan that would have the effect of (A) increasing the number of Shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan (other than as provided in Section 3(c) or (d)), (B) expanding the class of individuals eligible for participation in the Plan, (C) materially increasing the benefits available to participants under the Plan, or (D) lowering the exercise or grant price of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right after it is granted, and (ii) if and to the extent necessary to satisfy Sections 162(m) or 422 of the Code, other applicable law or applicable stock exchange requirements.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

89

Table of Contents

Appendix A

Awards may be granted under the Plan prior to the receipt of such shareholder approval but each such grant shall be subject in its entirety to such approval and no award may be exercised, vested or otherwise satisfied prior to the receipt of such approval. Nothing herein shall restrict the Committee’s ability to exercise its discretionary authority pursuant to Section 4 hereof, which discretion may be exercised without amendment to the Plan. No action hereunder may, without the consent of a Participant, adversely affect the Participant’s rights under any outstanding Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 19, no amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance or termination may be made that would cause a Participant to become subject to tax under Section 409A(a)(1).

20. Transfers Upon Death; Nonassignability.

(a)General Prohibition Upon Transfer.Upon the death of a Participant or Non-employee Director, outstanding Awards granted to such Participant or Non-employee Director may be exercised only by the executor or administrator of the Participant’s or Non-employee Director’s estate or by a person who shall have acquired the right to such exercise by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer of an Award by will or the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Committee shall have been furnished with (i) written notice thereof and with a copy of the will and/or such evidence as the Committee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer, and (ii) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Award that are or would have been applicable to the Participant or Non-employee Director and to be bound by the acknowledgments made by the Participant or Non-employee Director in connection with the grant of the Award.
(b)Certain Transfers Permitted.During the lifetime of a Participant or Non-employee Director, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit the transfer of an outstanding Option, unless such Option is an Incentive Stock Option and the Committee and the Participant intend that it shall retain such status. Subject to the approval of the Committee and to any conditions that the Committee may prescribe, a Participant or Non-employee Director may, upon providing written notice to the Secretary of the Company, elect to transfer any or all Options granted to such Participant pursuant to the Plan to members of his or her immediate family (including, but not limited to, children, grandchildren and spouse or to trusts for the benefit of such immediate family members or to partnerships in which such family members are the only partners) or to other persons or entities approved by the Committee; provided, however, that no such transfer by any Participant or Non-employee Director may be made in exchange for consideration.

21. Expenses and Receipts.

The expenses of the Plan shall be paid by the Company. Any proceeds received by the Company in connection with any Award shall be used for general corporate purposes.

22. Failure to Comply.

In addition to the remedies of the Company elsewhere provided for herein, failure by a Participant or Non-employee Director (or beneficiary) to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the Plan or the applicable Agreement, unless such failure is remedied by such Participant or Non-employee Director (or beneficiary) within ten (10) days after notice of such failure by the Committee, shall be grounds for the cancellation and forfeiture of such Award, in whole or in part, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine.

23. Effective Date and Term of Plan.

The Plan shall be subject to the requisite approval of the shareholders of the Company. In the absence of such approval, any Awards shall be null and void. Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the right to grant Awards under the Plan shall terminate on February 13, 2027. Awards outstanding at Plan termination shall remain in effect according to their terms and the provisions of the Plan.

90

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix A

24. Applicable Law.

The Plan shall be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia without reference to its principles of conflicts of law.

25. No Right to Awards.

No person shall have any claim or right to receive an Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment for Participants. The Committee’s granting of an Award to a Participant at any time shall neither require the Committee to grant any other Award to such Participant or other person at any time or preclude the Committee from making subsequent grants to such Participant or any other person.

26. No Fractional Shares.

No fractional shares of Company Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

27. Certain Limitations.

Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, (a) the Committee shall have the right at any time to deny or delay a Participant’s exercise of Options if such Participant is reasonably believed by the Committee (i) to be engaged in conduct adversely affecting the Company or its Affiliates in a material way, or (ii) to be contemplating such conduct, unless and until the Committee shall have received reasonable assurance that the Participant is not engaged in, and is not contemplating, such conduct, and (b) Participants are and at all times shall remain subject to the trading window policies adopted by the Company from time to time throughout the period of time during which they may exercise Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or sell shares of Company Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan.

28. Beneficiary.

A Participant may file with the Committee a written designation of a beneficiary on such form as may be prescribed by the Committee and may, from time to time, amend or revoke such designation. If no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, the executor or administrator of the Participant’s estate shall be deemed to be the Participant’s beneficiary.

29. Non-Competition and Confidentiality.

By accepting Awards and as a condition to the exercise of Awards and the enjoyment of any benefits of the Plan, including participation therein, each Participant agrees to be bound by and subject to non-competition, confidentiality and invention ownership agreements acceptable to the Committee.

30. Unfunded Status of Awards.

The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Agreement shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company.

31. Interpretation.

The Plan is designed and intended to comply with Rule 16b-3 and, to the extent applicable, with Section 162(m) and Section 409A of the Code, and all provisions hereof shall be construed in a manner to so comply. Headings to Sections of the Plan are intended for convenience of reference only and shall have no effect on the interpretation of the Plan.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

91

Table of Contents

Appendix A

32. Severability.

If any provision of the Plan is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions of the Plan shall not be affected but shall be applied as if the invalid or unenforceable provision had not been included in the Plan.

33. Section 409A.

The Plan as well as payments and benefits under the Plan are intended to be exempt from or, to the extent subject thereto, to comply with, Section 409A, and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, the Plan shall be interpreted in accordance therewith. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, to the extent required in order to avoid taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A: (a) a Participant shall not be considered to have terminated employment or service with the Company or its Affiliates for purposes of the Plan and no payment shall be due to the Participant under the Plan or any Award until the Participant has incurred a Separation from Service; (b) any payments described in the Plan that are due within the “short term deferral period” as defined in Section 409A shall not be treated as deferred compensation unless applicable law requires otherwise; (c) no payment to a “specified employee” (as such term is defined in Section 409A) upon Separation from Service shall be made before six (6) months after the date on which the Separation from Service occurs. All distributions under the Plan shall be made in the form of a single sum, unless otherwise specified under the terms of the Plan or by the Committee at the time of grant, and each amount to be paid or benefit to be provided under this Plan shall be construed as a separate identified payment for purposes of Section 409A. The Company makes no representation that any or all of the payments or benefits described in the Plan will be exempt from or comply with Section 409A and makes no undertaking to preclude Section 409A from applying to any such payment, and each Participant shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes and penalties incurred under Section 409A.

92

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix B

Appendix B – Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan

1. Purposes.

The purposes of the Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan (the “2018 MIP”) are to reinforce corporate, organizational and business-development goals; to promote the achievement of year-to-year and long-range financial and other business objectives; to directly tie a portion of participants compensation to the performance of the Company; and to reward the performance of individual officers and other employees in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range achievements.

2. Definitions.

The following terms, as used herein, shall have the following meanings:

(a)“2018 MIP” shall mean the Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan.
(b)“Affiliate” shall mean an affiliate of Parent, as defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
(c)“Annual Base Salary” shall mean: (i) with respect to any Executive Officer, the annual rate of base salary of such Executive Officer in effect as of the first day of any Performance Period (or, if an Executive Officer was not employed as of the first day of a Performance Period, the annual rate of base salary in effect as of such Executive Officer’s first day of employment); and (ii) with respect to any other Participant, unless otherwise determined by the Company, the annualized base salary paid to such Participant in respect of any Performance Period.
(d)“Award” shall mean a non-equity incentive compensation award, granted pursuant to the 2018 MIP, which is contingent upon the attainment of Performance Goals with respect to a Performance Period.
(e)“Award Agreement” shall mean any written agreement, contract, or other instrument or document between Parent and a Participant evidencing an Award.
(f)“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of Parent.
(g)“Cause” shall mean, unless a Participant is a party to a written employment agreement with the Company which contains a definition of “cause,” “good cause,” “termination for cause,” or any other similar term or phrase, in which case “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in such agreement, that in the sole discretion of the Committee the Participant has engaged in conduct involving one or more of the following:
(i)the substantial and continuing failure of the Participant to render services to the Company in accordance with the Participant’s obligations and position with the Company;
(ii)dishonesty, gross negligence, or breach of fiduciary duty by the Participant;
(iii)the commission by the Participant of an act of fraud or embezzlement, as found by a court of competent jurisdiction;
(iv)the conviction of the Participant, or plea by the Participant, of guilty or nolo contendre to a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude; or
(v)a material breach by the Participant of the terms of an agreement with the Company, provided that the Company provides the Participant with adequate notice of such breach and the Participant fails to cure such breach, if the breach is reasonably curable, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice.
(h)“Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of an event described in Section 6(f) hereof.
(i)“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(j)“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board.
(k)“Company” shall mean, collectively, Parent, its subsidiaries and its Affiliates.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

93

Table of Contents

Appendix B

(l)“Covered Employee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.
(m)“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(n)“Executive Officer” shall mean an “executive officer” of Parent within the meaning of the Exchange Act.
(o)“Good Reason” shall mean, unless a Participant is a party to a written employment agreement with the Company which contains a definition of “good reason” or any other similar term or phrase, in which case “Good Reason” shall have the meaning set forth in such agreement, the termination of employment by a Participant upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events to the extent that there is, or would be if not corrected, a material negative change in the Participant’s employment relationship with the Company:
(i)A material reduction of the Participant’s base salary;
(ii)A significant diminution of the Participant’s duties and responsibilities;
(iii)The relocation of the Parent’s principal office or of Participant’s own office to any place beyond twenty-five (25) miles from the current principal office of the Parent in Columbus, Georgia, or the Participant’s own office, respectively, without the Participant’s consent; and

provided, that a Participant shall have Good Reason under this Plan only if (A) the Participant provides the Company, within ninety (90) days of the occurrence of the event giving rise to the notice, a written notice indicating the specific Good Reason provision(s) in this Plan relied upon, setting forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for Good Reason, and indicating a date of termination of employment (not less than thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days after the date such notice is given); and (B) such facts and circumstances are not substantially corrected by the Company prior to the date of termination specified by the Participant in such notice. Any failure by the Participant to set forth in a notice of Good Reason any facts or circumstances which contribute to the showing of Good Reason shall not waive any right of the Participant hereunder or preclude the Participant from asserting such fact or circumstances in enforcing his or her rights hereunder.

(p)“Parent” shall mean Aflac Incorporated, a Georgia corporation.
(q)“Participant” shall mean an officer or other employee of the Company who is, pursuant to Section 4 of the 2018 MIP, selected to participate herein.
(r)“Performance Goal” shall mean the criteria and objectives, determined by the Committee, which must be met during the applicable Performance Period as a condition of the Participant’s receipt of payment with respect to an Award. Performance Goals may include any or all or any combination of the following: new premium sales; premium income; investment income; revenues; total insurance benefits (cash claims, increase in future benefits and incurred but not reported claims); expense levels; premium payment levels; persistency rate (based on premiums or policies); policy renewals; profit margins; operating earnings (excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion the effects of one or more of the following items: realized gains or losses on investments, the impact from passive derivative activities and hedging, the change in fair value of the interest rate component of cross-currency swaps, and items considered by the Committee to be nonrecurring in nature, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by a state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, or items excluded from the presentation of operating earnings in the information filed or furnished by Parent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time); net earnings (either before or after provision for the cumulative effect of required accounting changes for the applicable period); return on equity ( operating earnings excluding the impact of foreign exchange divided by the average of common shareholders’ equity in the Company as of the beginning and end of the applicable period, excluding in the Committee’s sole discretion accumulated comprehensive income as recognized under ASC 320); new money investment yield; return on invested assets; shareholders’ equity; operating return on shareholders’ equity; regulatory capital levels; return on regulatory capital; risk-based capital levels or ratios; solvency margin ratio; stock price; total return to shareholders; or, to the extent an Award is made to an individual who is not a Covered Employee, such other performance goals as the Committee shall deem appropriate. As determined by the Committee, achievement of the Performance Goals may be measured (a) individually, alternatively or in any combination,

94

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix B

(b) with respect to Parent, a subsidiary, division, business unit or segment, product line, product, or any combination of the foregoing, (c) on an absolute basis, or relative to a target, to growth levels, to a designated comparison group, to results in other periods, to an index, or to other external measures, and (d) on an aggregate or per-share basis. Performance goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no Award will be earned, levels of performance at which an Award will become partially earned and a level at which an Award will be fully earned. To the extent required to qualify payment under an Award as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, Awards whose vesting or exercise is conditioned on the attainment of performance goals shall become vested only after the attainment of such performance goals has been certified by the Committee. The Committee may provide that the achievement of performance goals shall be determined without regard to the impact of any event or occurrence which the Committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as restructuring or subsidiary conversion charges, assessments by any state guaranty association or similar entity, or other nonrecurring charges, a change in accounting standards required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), items of an unusual or infrequently recurring nature, changes in applicable laws or regulations, or by excluding all or a portion of the effect of translating foreign currently of business segments to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes; provided that with respect to Awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), the Committee shall not exercise any discretion with respect to such an Award that would cause it to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation. With respect to Participants who are not Covered Employees, Performance Goals may also include such qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish; and with respect to Participants who are Covered Employees, the Committee may, subject to attainment of Performance Goals described above, impose additional qualitative performance goals as the Committee shall, from time to time, establish.

(s)“Performance Period” shall mean in respect of any Award the Company’s fiscal year or, in the case of a Participant who on the date of grant of the Award is Parent’s Chief Investment Officer (or the employee with duties typically reserved for a chief investment officer) or directly or indirectly reports to such individual, a period of one, two or three consecutive fiscal years of the Company.
(t)“Stock” shall mean shares of Common Stock, par value $.10 per share, of Parent.

3. Administration.

The 2018 MIP shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority in its sole discretion, subject to and not inconsistent with, the express provisions of the 2018 MIP, to administer the 2018 MIP and to exercise all the powers and authorities either specifically granted to it under the 2018 MIP or necessary or advisable in the administration of the 2018 MIP, including, without limitation, the authority to grant Awards; to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards shall be granted; to determine the duration of the Performance Period applicable to any Award; to determine the terms, conditions, restrictions and performance criteria, including Performance Goals, relating to any Award; to certify whether the Performance Goals have been attained; to determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an Award may be settled, canceled, forfeited, or surrendered; to construe and interpret the 2018 MIP and any Award; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2018 MIP; to determine the terms and provisions of Award Agreements; and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2018 MIP.

All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Committee in respect of the 2018 MIP shall be final and binding on all persons, including the Company, the Participant (or any person claiming any rights under the 2018 MIP from or through any Participant) and any shareholder.

No member of the Board or the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or determination made in good faith with respect to the 2018 MIP or any Award granted hereunder.

4. Eligibility.

Awards may be granted to officers and other employees of the Company in the sole discretion of the Committee. Subject to Section 5(b) below, in determining the persons to whom Awards shall be granted and the Performance

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

95

Table of Contents

Appendix B

Goals relating to each Award, the Committee shall take into account such factors as the Committee shall deem relevant in connection with accomplishing the purposes of the 2018 MIP.

5. Terms of Awards.

Awards granted pursuant to the 2018 MIP shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in such form as the Committee shall from time to time approve.

(a)In General. The Committee shall specify with respect to a Performance Period the Performance Goals applicable to each Award and, if and as applicable, minimum, target and maximum levels applicable to each Performance Goal. Awards for any Performance Period may be expressed as a dollar amount or as a percentage of the Participant’s Annual Base Salary. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in connection with specified terminations of employment (for Covered Employees, only terminations due to disability or death), or except as set forth in Section 6(f) hereof, payment in respect of Awards shall be made only if and to the extent the Performance Goals with respect to such Performance Period have been attained.
(b)Special Provisions Regarding Awards. No Participant during any fiscal year of the Company shall be granted more than one Award; however, to the extent the Performance Period under an Award exceeds one year, any Participant may be subject to multiple Awards at any time (where, for example, Awards with three-year Performance Periods are granted in consecutive years). In any event, the maximum amount that may become payable under the 2018 MIP to a Participant who is a Covered Employee for any fiscal year of the Company in respect all Awards whose Performance Period ends with or within such year shall not exceed $9 million.
(c)Time and Form of Payment. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments with respect of Awards granted under this 2018 MIP shall be made, in cash, within a reasonable period (but in any event within 2½ months) after the end of the Performance Period. In the case of Participants who are Covered Employees, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, such payments shall be made only after achievement of the Performance Goals has been certified by the Committee.

6. General Provisions.

(a)Compliance with Legal Requirements. The 2018 MIP and the granting and payment of Awards, and the other obligations of the Company under the 2018 MIP and any Award Agreement or other agreement, shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any regulatory or governmental agency as may be required.
(b)Nontransferability. Awards shall not be transferable by a Participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
(c)No Right To Continued Employment. Nothing in the 2018 MIP or in any Award granted or any Award Agreement or other agreement entered into pursuant hereto shall confer upon any Participant the right to continue in the employ of the Company or to be entitled to any remuneration or benefits not set forth in the 2018 MIP or such Award Agreement or other agreement or to interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate such Participant’s employment.
(d)Withholding Taxes. The Company shall have the right to withhold the amount of any taxes that the Company may be required to withhold before delivery of payment of an Award to the Participant or other person entitled to such payment, or to make such other arrangements for the withholding of taxes that the Company deems satisfactory.
(e)Amendment, Termination and Duration of the 2018 MIP. The Board or the Committee may at any time and from time to time alter, amend, suspend, or terminate the 2018 MIP in whole or in part; provided that no amendment that requires shareholder approval in order for the 2018 MIP to continue to comply with Code Section 162(m) shall be effective unless the same shall be approved by the requisite vote of the shareholders of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment shall affect adversely any of the rights of any Participant, without such Participant’s consent, under any Award theretofore granted under the 2018

96

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix B

MIP. No Awards may be granted under the 2018 MIP after 2022; provided that all payments with respect to Awards previously granted under the 2018 MIP shall be paid out pursuant to the terms of the 2018 MIP.

(f)Change in Control. Unless an employment agreement between the Company and the Participant provides otherwise, and notwithstanding any other provision of the 2018 MIP to the contrary, if, while any Awards remain outstanding under the 2018 MIP a “Change in Control” of Parent (as defined in this Section 6(f)) shall occur, and within 24 months of such Change in Control the Company shall cease to employ the Participant due to termination of employment other than by (i) the Company for Cause, or (ii) the Participant without Good Reason, then any Performance Period outstanding at the time of such Change in Control shall be deemed to have been completed, the maximum level of performance set forth under the respective Performance Goals shall be deemed to have been attained and a pro rata portion (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each Performance Period) of each outstanding Award granted to each Participant for any outstanding Performance Period shall become payable in cash to each Participant. In the event of (i) a liquidation of the Parent, (ii) a reorganization, merger, or consolidation of the Parent as a result of which the outstanding common stock of the Parent is changed into or exchanged for cash or property or securities not of the Parent’s issue, (iii) a sale, exchange, or transfer of all or substantially all of the property of the Parent, or one of its business units, to another person or corporation, (iv) the direct or indirect acquisition of all or substantially all of the outstanding voting shares of the Parent by another person, corporation or other entity, or (v) any other Change in Control (any such event, a “Corporate Transaction”), the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, arrange with the surviving entity, continuing successor, or purchasing corporation or other entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiring Entity”), for the Acquiring Entity to assume the Parent’s rights and obligations under outstanding Awards or substitute Awards. To the extent the Acquiring Entity elects not to assume the Company’s rights and obligations under such outstanding Awards, then any Performance Period outstanding at the time of such Corporate Transaction shall be deemed to have been completed, the maximum level of performance set forth under the respective Performance Goals shall be deemed to have been attained and a pro rata portion (based on the number of full and partial months that have elapsed with respect to each Performance Period) of each outstanding Award granted to each Participant for any outstanding Performance Period shall become payable in cash to each Participant.

For purposes of this paragraph 6(f), a Change in Control of Parent shall occur upon the happening of the earliest to occur of the following:

(i)any “person,” as such term is used in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (1) Parent, or any of its subsidiaries, (2) any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under a benefit plan of Parent or any of its subsidiaries, (3) any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (4) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of Parent in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Stock), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates) representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the combined voting power of Parent’s then outstanding voting securities;
(ii)individuals who, as of May 1, 2017 constitute the Board, and any new director (other than an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of Parent) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by Parent’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof;
(iii)there is consummated a merger or consolidation of Parent or any direct or indirect subsidiary of Parent with any other corporation, other than (A) a merger or consolidation which would result in the “beneficial owners” (as hereinabove defined) of the securities of Parent outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving or parent entity), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of Parent, at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

97

Table of Contents

Appendix B

combined voting power of the securities of Parent or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation, or (B) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of Parent (or similar transaction) in which no “person” (as hereinabove defined), directly or indirectly, acquires more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of Parent’s then outstanding securities (not including any securities acquired directly from Parent or its Affiliates); or

(iv)the shareholders of Parent approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of Parent or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by Parent of all or substantially all of Parent’s assets (or any transaction having a similar effect), other than a sale or disposition by Parent of all or substantially all of Parent’s assets to an entity, at least 75% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by shareholders of Parent in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Parent immediately prior to such sale.

Notwithstanding the foregoing definition, “Change in Control” with respect to any Award shall mean a “Change in Control” as defined in the employment agreement (if any) between the Company and the Participant, if different from the foregoing and applicable to Awards under the Plan.

(g)Participant Rights. No Participant shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the 2018 MIP, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment for Participants. Awards under the 2018 MIP shall be subject to any applicable policies of Parent, including without limitation any policies relating to the recoupment of compensation upon a restatement of financial results.
(h)Unfunded Status of Awards. The 2018 MIP is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the 2018 MIP or any Award shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of an unsecured general creditor of the Company.
(i)Governing Laws. The 2018 MIP and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof.
(j)Effective Date. The 2018 MIP shall take effect upon January 1, 2018, following its adoption by the Board; provided that the 2018 MIP shall be subject to the requisite approval of the shareholders of the Company in order to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code. In the absence of such approval, the 2018 MIP (and any Awards made pursuant to the 2018 MIP with respect to the 2018 fiscal year or thereafter) shall be null and void.
(k)Beneficiary. A Participant may file with the Committee or its designee a written designation of a beneficiary on such form as may be prescribed by the Committee and may, from time to time, amend or revoke such designation. If no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, the executor or administrator of the Participant’s estate shall be deemed to be the grantee’s beneficiary.
(l)Interpretation. The 2018 MIP is designed and intended to comply, to the extent applicable, with Sections 162(m) and 409A of the Code, and all provisions hereof shall be construed in a manner to so comply.

98

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Appendix C

Appendix C – Definition of Non-GAAPNon-U.S. GAAP Measures and Reconciliations to Corresponding U.S. GAAP Measures

The Proxy Statement includes references to the Company’s performance measures, operating earnings, operatingmeasures; adjusted earnings; adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding foreign currency effect, operatingimpact; adjusted revenues on a currency-neutral basis,basis; and operatingadjusted return on equity excluding(“AROE”). (References in this Proxy Statement such as “currency-neutral” or “excluding the impact of foreign currency” are synonymous with “excluding foreign currency effect.impact.”) These measures are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP.GAAP”), but this appendix provides reconciliations to each of the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.

These measures exclude items that the companyCompany believes may obscure the underlying fundamentals and trends in insurance operations because they tend to be driven by general economic conditions and events, or are related to infrequent activities not directly associated with insurance operations. Management uses operatingadjusted earnings and operatingadjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding foreign currency impact, to evaluate the financial performance of Thethe Company’s insurance operations on a consolidated basis, and believes that a presentation of these measures is vitally important to an understanding of the underlying profitability drivers and trends of Aflac’sthe Company’s insurance business.

The Company defines operatingadjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as the profits derived from operations. OperatingThe most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings includes interest cash flows associated with notes payable but excludesare adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside of management’s control, such ascontrol. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from securities transactions, impairments,derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and derivativeoperating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect the Company’s underlying business performance.

The Company believes that amortized hedge costs/income, which are a component of adjusted earnings, measure the periodic currency risk management costs associated with hedging activities; nonrecurring items;a portion of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments and other non-operating are an important component of net investment income. Amortized hedge costs/income (loss) activitiesrepresent costs/income incurred or recognized in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign exchange risks in the company’s Japan segment (costs) or in the Corporate and Other segment (income). These amortized hedge costs/ income are derived from net earnings.the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs

OperatingAdjusted earnings per share (basic or dilutive)diluted) are the operatingadjusted earnings for the period divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or dilutive)diluted) for the period presented. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings per share.

Adjusted return on equity excludes foreign currency impact and is calculated using adjusted earnings excluding the impact of the yen/dollar exchange rate, as reconciled with total U.S. GAAP net earnings, divided by average shareholders’ equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income.

70       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Appendix – Definition of Non-U.S. GAAP Measures and Reconciliations to Corresponding U.S. GAAP Measures

Adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.

Adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.

Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where the functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. As a result, the company views foreign currency translation as a financial reporting issue for Aflac rather than an economic event to the company or shareholders. Because aA significant portion of the company’sCompany’s business is conducted in Japanyen and never converted to dollars but translated in dollars for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, which results in foreign exchangecurrency impacts to earnings, cash flows and book value on a U.S. GAAP basis. Because foreign currency rates are outside of management’s control, Aflacthe Company believes it is important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen intoto U.S. dollars. OperatingAdjusted earnings, operatingadjusted earnings per diluted share “excluding current period foreign currency impact”,impact,” and operatingadjusted revenues on a currency-neutral basis are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates dollar based fluctuations driven solely from currency rate changes.

Operating return on equity excluding foreign currency effect for fiscal year 2016 is calculated using operating earnings excluding yen, as reconciled with total GAAP net earnings. This is divided by average shareholders’ equity, excluding unrealized gains/losses on investment securities and derivatives of $4.8 billion at December 31, 2016; however, the yen-based equity balances beginning and ending are restated at the previous year’s exchange rate to ensure comparability to the prior year.

AFLAC INCORPORATED2017 PROXY STATEMENT

99

Table of Contents

Appendix C

The following table is a reconciliation of items impacting operating earnings, net earnings, operating earnings per diluted share, and net earnings per diluted share to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures for the year ended December 31, 2016.

RECONCILIATION OF NET EARNINGS TO OPERATING EARNINGS

  In Millions Per Diluted Share
  2016 2015 2016 2015
Net earnings $ 2,659 $ 2,533 $ 6.42 $ 5.85
Items impacting net earnings:        
Realized investment (gains) losses:        
Securities transactions and impairments (132) (150) (.32) (.35)
Impact of derivative and hedging activities:        
Hedge costs related to foreign currency investments(1) 186 72 .45 .17
Other derivative and hedging activities(1), (2) 154 23 .37 .05
Other and non-recurring (income) loss 28 266(3) .07 .61
Income tax (benefit) expense on items excluded from operating earnings(1) (83) (74) (.20) (.17)
Operating earnings 2,812 2,670 6.79 6.16
Current period foreign currency impact(4) (141) N/A (.34) N/A
Operating earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact(5) $ 2,671 $ 2,670 $ 6.45 $ 6.16

(1) Prior year amounts have been reclassified to reflect the change in methodology of calculating the hedge costs related to foreign currency investments.

(2) Excludes a gain of $85 in both 2016 and 2015 related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gain when analyzing segment operations.

(3) Includes a loss of $20 in 2015 related to the change in value of yen repatriation received in advance of settlement of certain foreign currency derivatives. This loss was offset by derivative gains included in other derivative and hedging activities.

(4) Prior period foreign currency impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.

(5) Amounts excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates dollar-based fluctuations driven solely fromby currency rate changes.

RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-U.S. GAAP MEASURES(1)

The tables on the following pages provide reconciliations of adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share, each excluding foreign currency impact, adjusted return on equity excluding foreign currency, and adjusted revenues excluding foreign currency, to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

100

AFLAC INCORPORATEDRECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP NET EARNINGS TO ADJUSTED EARNINGS(1)
2017 PROXY STATEMENT(EXCLUDING FOREIGN CURRENCY)


In Millions       Per Diluted Share
Twelve Months Ended December 31,       2019       2018       2019       2018
Net earnings$3,304$2,920$4.43$3.77
Items impacting net earnings:
Realized investment (gains) losses(2),(3),(4),(5)15297.02.38
Other and non-recurring (income) loss175.00.10
Income tax (benefit) expense on items excluded from adjusted earnings(3)(83).00(.11)
Tax reform adjustment(6)(4)18(.01).02
Adjusted earnings3,3143,2264.444.16
Current period foreign currency impact(7)(15)N/A(.02)N/A
Adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact$3,299$3,226$4.42$4.16
(1)Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
(2)Amortized hedge costs of $257 in 2019 and $236 in 2018, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a decrease to net investment income. See “Hedge Costs/Income” discussion below for further information.
(3)Amortized hedge income of $89 in 2019 and $36 in 2018, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as increase to net investment income. See “Hedge Costs/Income” discussion below for further information.
(4)Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(17) in 2019 and an immaterial amount for 2018 have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income.
(5)A gain of $66 in 2019 and $67 in 2018, respectively, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of interest expense.
(6)The impact of Tax Reform was adjusted in 2018 for return-to-provision adjustments, various amended returns filed by the company, and final true-ups of deferred tax liabilities. Further impacts were recorded in 2019 a result of additional guidance released by the IRS.
(7)Prior period foreign currency impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.

2020 Proxy Statement       71


Table of Contents

Appendix – Definition of Non-U.S. GAAP Measures and Reconciliations to Corresponding U.S. GAAP Measures

RECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) TO ADJUSTED ROE(1)
(EXCLUDING FOREIGN CURRENCY)

Twelve Months Ended December 31,       2019       2018
Net earnings - U.S. GAAP ROE(2)12.6%12.2%
Impact of excluding unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(1.0)(1.0)
Impact of excluding unrealized gains (losses) on securities and derivatives3.63.0
Impact of excluding pension liability adjustment(0.1)(0.1)
Impact of excluding AOCI2.51.8
U.S. GAAP ROE - less AOCI15.113.9
Differences between adjusted earnings and net earnings(3)1.5
Adjusted ROE - reported15.215.4
Less: Impact of foreign currency(4)0.1N/A
Adjusted ROE, excluding impact of foreign currency15.115.4
(1)Amounts presented may not foot due to rounding.
(2)U.S. GAAP ROE is calculated by dividing net earnings (annualized) by average shareholders’ equity.
(3)See separate reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings.
(4)Impact of foreign currency is calculated by restating all yen components of the income statement to the weighted average yen rate for the comparable prior year period. The impact is the difference of the restated adjusted earnings compared to reported adjusted earnings. For comparative purposes, only current period income is restated using the weighted average prior period exchange rate, which eliminates the foreign currency impact for the current period. This allows for equal comparison of this financial measure.

RECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP TOTAL REVENUES TO ADJUSTED REVENUES(1)
(EXCLUDING FOREIGN CURRENCY)

Twelve Months Ended December 31,       2019       2018
Total Revenue - U.S. GAAP$22,307$21,758
Add: Total U.S. GAAP Realized Losses135430
Add: Realized capital gain/loss items included in Adjusted Revenue
Amortized hedge costs(168)(200)
Interest cash flows on derivatives associated with investment strategies(17)1
Differences between adjusted revenues and total revenues
Adjusted revenues$22,256$21,988
Less: Impact of foreign currency(2)176N/A
Adjusted revenues, excluding impact of foreign currency$22,080$21,988
(1)Amounts presented may not foot due to rounding.
(2)Impact of foreign currency is calculated by restating all yen components of the income statement to the weighted average yen rate for the comparable prior year period. The impact is the difference of the restated adjusted revenues compared to reported adjusted revenues. For comparative purposes, only current period income is restated using the weighted average prior period exchange rate, which eliminates the foreign currency impact for the current period. This allows for equal comparison of this financial measure.

72       Aflac Incorporated


Table of Contents

Corporate Citizenship

The CompanyAflac Incorporated strongly believes that ethics, corporate citizenship and success go hand in hand. All things being equal, we believe most people prefer doing business with a company that’s also a good corporate citizen. That meansWhether it’s helping families facing childhood cancer, conducting business with ethics and grace, providing opportunity for our workforce or being ever-mindful of our environment, serving the community while helping others also can makeis not only the right thing to do, it makes good business sense. This philosophy is incorporated into oura part of Aflac Incorporated’s daily operations, our culture and our actions in the community. In 2016, our career sales force and employees continued their generous support for theAflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center

The Company has launched a digital ESG hub at esg.aflac.com. The hub is to provides enhanced disclosures of Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, a partnership we initiated in 1995. We are proud that the Aflac Cancer Center was named one ofIncorporated’s environmental and social efforts. These disclosures align with the top 10 pediatric cancer programs inGlobal Reporting Initiative, United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and the United States in 2015 and 2016 byU.S. News and World Report, due in part to its distinction in research.

The Company also has shown a commitment to the environment by striking a balance between effective, efficient operations and responsible environmental stewardship.

To learn more about these achievements and our efforts to be good corporate citizens, please visithttps://www.aflac.com/about-aflac/corporate-citizenship/default.aspx.

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board.

GOVERNANCEWORKPLACE

Named a World’s Most Ethical Company by the Ethisphere Institute for14 consecutive years
Won IDG’s 2020 CSO50 Awards for security projects and initiatives demonstratingoutstanding business valueandthought leadership
Placed #1by Security Magazine’s Security 500rankings in the Insurance/ Reinsurance sector in 2019

In the United States,35%of our key senior leadership team areethnic minorities or women and 66% of our U.S. employees arewomen
Made Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies list
Included in Black Enterprise magazine’s list of the50 Best Companies for Diversityand LATINA Style’slist of50 Best Companies for Latinas to Workfor in the United States
Added to the Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index, which tracks the financial performance of public companies committed to supporting gender equality through policy development, representation and transparency
PHILANTHROPYSUSTAINABILITY

More than17,000Aflac independent sales associates contribute more than$500,000from their commission checks to the Aflac Cancer Center each month.
In 2019, our employees in the United States put in more than16,000 volunteer hours with community and charitable organizations.

More than85% of the buildingsthe Company owns and operates in the United States have earnedEnergy Star certification. Energy Star certified buildings use less energy and contribute fewer greenhouse gas emissions to the environment.
Became thefirst insurance company in the United States to achieve bothISO 50001 Energy Management System and ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems certifications, which help to implement technical and management strategies that significantly cut energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions – and sustain those savings over time.
Aflac Incorporated has reduced its combined Scope 1 and Scope 2 ghg emissions by more than 50% compared to its 2007 base line.




Table of Contents

Corporate Profile

AFLAC JAPAN

In Japan, where we insure one in four households*, 2016 was a year of strengthening relationships with our sales channels and enhancing our product line to ensure we’re continuing to meet the needs of consumers. We saw success in sales of our third sector products, particularly with the product we pioneered — cancer insurance. Results like these help us to maintain our status as the leading provider of both medical and cancer insurance in Japan.

AFLAC U.S.

In the United States, Aflac again earned the distinction of being the number one provider of voluntary insurance at the worksite.** In 2016 Aflac U.S. generated solid results, and we’re encouraged that changes to our career and broker management infrastructure are laying the foundation for expanded long-term sales growth opportunities. We are very proud of our success with One Day Pay, our industry-first initiative that allows us to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. Further highlighting our commitment to customer service, Aflac’s contact centers were recognized by J.D. Power by providing “An Outstanding Customer Service Experience” for the Live Phone Channel.

*Based on the 2016 number of households published by Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
**Source: Eastbridge Consulting Group, Inc. U.S. Worksite/Voluntary Sales Report. Carrier Results for 2015. Avon, CT: April 2016

Aflac Incorporated

1932 Wynnton Road

Columbus, Georgia 31999

aflac.com



Table of Contents

AFLAC INCORPORATED
WORLDWIDE HEADQUARTERS
1932 WYNNTON ROAD
COLUMBUS, GA 31999

(ONLY IF YOU AGREE WITH YOUR VOTING RIGHTS CAN YOU VOTE BY PHONE)

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2020 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29, 2020 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

AFLAC INCORPORATED

WORLDWIDE HEADQUARTERS

1932 WYNNTON ROAD

COLUMBUS, GA 31999

(ONLY IF YOU AGREE WITH YOUR VOTING RIGHTS CAN YOU VOTE BY PHONE)

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2020 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 29, 2020 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.



TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E19133-P86009                      E92578-P34746KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
AFLAC INCORPORATED
 
     THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 4, 5 AND 6, AND EVERY "YEAR" FOR PROPOSAL 3.
 
 The following proposals are being submitted to the Shareholders:
  
     1.to elect 14as Directors of the Company the eleven nominees
named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve until the
next Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected
and qualifiedqualified;
 
         Nominees:For Against Abstain         

                               
Nominees:   ForAgainstAbstain
1a.Daniel P. Amos¨¨¨
 
1b.W. Paul Bowers
1c.Toshihiko Fukuzawa
1d.Thomas J. Kenny
1e.Georgette D. Kiser
1f.Karole F. Lloyd
1g.Nobuchika Mori
1h.Joseph L. Moskowitz
1i.Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH
ForAgainstAbstain
        
1j. Katherine T. Rohrer
 1b.Paul S. Amos II¨¨¨
1c.W. Paul Bowers¨¨¨
1d.Kriss Cloninger III¨¨¨
1e.Toshihiko Fukuzawa¨¨¨
1f.   Elizabeth J. Hudson¨¨¨
1g.Douglas W. Johnson¨¨¨
1h.Robert B. Johnson¨¨¨
1i.Thomas J. Kenny¨¨¨
1j.Charles B. Knapp¨¨¨
1k.Karole F. Lloyd¨¨¨
1l.Joseph L. Moskowitz¨¨¨

For Against Abstain
1m.Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH¨¨¨
1n.    Melvin T. Stith¨¨¨
 
2.to consider the following non-binding advisory proposal:¨¨¨
 
"Resolved, thaton an advisory basis, the shareholders of Aflac Incorporated approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis executive compensationand accompanying tables and accompanying narrative discussion in the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement"
 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE OF EVERY "YEAR".Year  2 Years  3 Years  Abstain

3.      Non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation     ¨          ¨          ¨          ¨     

For Against Abstain
4.      3.to consider and act upon the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 20172020¨¨¨


Sign here as name(s) appear(s) on account. If acting as Attorney, Executor, Trustee or in other representative capacity, please sign name and title.

 
5.to approve the adoption of the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017) ("2017 LTIP") with additional shares authorized under the 2017 LTIP¨¨¨
6.to approve the adoption of the 2018 Management Incentive Plan ("2018 MIP")¨¨¨

Sign here as name(s) appear(s) on account. If acting as Attorney, Executor, Trustee or in other representative capacity, please sign name and title.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date



Table of Contents

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and 2016 Year in Review are available at www.proxyvote.com.

We have been advised that many states are strictly enforcing escheatment laws and requiring shares held in "inactive" accounts to be escheated to the state in which the shareholder was last known to reside. One way you can ensure your account is active is to vote your shares.

Therefore, it is very important that you vote. If you have moved, please provide your new address to Aflac Incorporated: Attn: Shareholder Services, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, GA 31999; by phone 800.227.4756 or by email shareholder@aflac.com.

Please inform us if you have multiple accounts under more than one name.

E19134-P86009

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and 2019 Year in Review are available at www.proxyvote.com.
We have been advised that many states are strictly enforcing escheatment laws and requiring shares held in “inactive” accounts to be escheated to the state in which the shareholder was last known to reside. One way you can ensure your account is active is to vote your shares.
Therefore, it is very important that you vote. If you have moved, please provide your new address to Aflac Incorporated: Attn: Shareholder Services, 1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, GA 31999; by phone 800.227.4756 or by email shareholder@aflac.com.
Please inform us if you have multiple accounts under more than one name.
We continue to monitor developments regarding the coronavirus (COVID-19). In the interest of the health and well-being of our shareholders, we are planning for the possibility that the Annual Meeting may be held solely by means of remote communication. If we make this change, we will announce the decision to do so in advance and provide details on how to participate at investors.aflac.com.





E92579-P34746

AFLAC INCORPORATED


Worldwide Headquarters


1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Daniel P. Amos, Kriss Cloninger III,Frederick J. Crawford, and Paul S. Amos II,J. Matthew Loudermilk, as Proxies or any one of them, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of Common Stock of Aflac Incorporated held of record by the undersigned on February 22, 2017,25, 2020, at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders to be held on Monday, May 1, 2017,4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., or any adjournment thereof.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 4, 5 AND 6, AND EVERY "YEAR" FOR PROPOSAL 3, AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

DESCRIPTION OF VOTING RIGHTS

In accordance with the Company's Articles of Incorporation, shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.10 per share (the "Common Stock") are entitled to one vote per share until they have been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of greater than 48 months prior to the record date of the meeting, at which time they become entitled to 10 votes per share. Where a share is transferred to a transferee by gift, devise, or bequest, or otherwise through the laws of inheritance, descent, or distribution from the estate of the transferor, or by distribution to a beneficiary of shares held in trust for such beneficiary, the transferee is deemed to be the same beneficial owner as the transferor for purposes of determining the number of votes per share. Shares acquired as a direct result of a stock split, stock dividend, or other distribution with respect to existing shares ("dividend shares") are deemed to have been acquired and held continuously from the date on which the shares with regard to which the issued dividend shares were acquired. Shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a stock option are deemed to have been acquired on the date the option was granted.

Shares of Common Stock held in "street" or "nominee" name are presumed to have been held for less than 48 months and are entitled to one vote per shareunless this presumption is rebutted by providing evidence to the contrary to the Board of Directors of the Company.Shareholders desiring to rebut this presumption should complete and execute the affidavit. The Board of Directors reserves the right to require evidence to support the affidavit.

Only if you do not agree with the voting rights shown on the front of this Proxy should you complete the following:

Affidavit

Under the penalties of perjury, I do solemnly swear that I am entitled to the number of votes set forth below because

I agree to provide evidence to support this statement at the request of the Company. Shares @1 Vote/Share= Votes
Sign hereX Shares @10 Votes/Share= Votes
XDate, 2020Total= Votes


Table of Contents


THIS IS A VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM.

You are receiving this voting instruction form because you hold shares in the above Security. You have the right to vote on proposals being presented at the upcoming Annual Meeting to be held on






VOTING INSTRUCTIONS












E92711-P33943
THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. PLEASE USE BLUE OR BLACK INK AND RETURN ONLY THE BOTTOM PORTION.


The Board recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): 1 through 3

1.

to elect as Directors of the Company the eleven nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their successors are dulyelected and qualified;

Nominees:

For

Against

Abstain

1a.Daniel P. Amos
1b.W. Paul Bowers
1c.Toshihiko Fukuzawa
1d.Thomas J. Kenny
1e.Georgette D. Kiser
1f.Karole F. Lloyd
1g.Nobuchika Mori
1h.Joseph L. Moskowitz
1i.Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH
1j.Katherine T. Rohrer
1k.Melvin T. Stith

Yes

No

HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION- Please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household.


Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date

Please check this box if you plan to attend the Meeting and vote these shares in person.


2.

to consider the following non-binding advisory proposal:

ForAgainstAbstain

"Resolved, on an advisory basis, theshareholders of Aflac Incorporated approvethe compensation of the named executiveofficers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and accompanying tables and narrativeinthe Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement"

3.

to consider and act upon the ratification ofthe appointment of KPMG LLP as independentregistered public accounting firm of theCompany for the year ending December 31, 2020

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.




Table of Contents
















E92712-P33943








DESCRIPTION OF VOTING RIGHTS

In accordance with the Company's Articles of Incorporation, shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.10 per share (the "Common Stock") are entitled to one vote per share until they have been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of greater than 48 months prior to therecord date of the meeting, at which time they become entitled to 10 votes per share. Where a share is transferred to a transferee by gift, devise, orbequest, or otherwise through the laws of inheritance, descent, or distribution from the estate of the transferor, or by distribution to a beneficiary of shares held in trust for such beneficiary, the transferee is deemed to be the same beneficial owner as the transferor for purposes of determining thenumber of votes per share. Shares acquired as a direct result of a stock split, stock dividend, or other distribution with respect to existing shares ("dividend shares") are deemed to have been acquired and held continuously from the date on which the shares with regard to which the issued dividendshares were acquired. Shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a stock option are deemed to have been acquired on the date the option was granted.

Sharesof Common Stock held in "street" or "nominee" name are presumed to have been held for less than 48 months and are entitled to one vote pershare unlessthis presumption is rebutted by providing evidence to the contrary to the Board of Directors of the Company.Shareholders desiring to rebutthis presumption should complete and execute the affidavit. The Board of Directors reserves the right to require evidence to support the affidavit.

Affidavit

Under the penalties of perjury, I do solemnly swear that I am entitled to the number of votes set forth below because

I agree to provide evidence to support this statement at the request of the Company.     ________________ Shares @1 Vote/Share=____________Votes Votes
Sign hereX________________ Shares @10 Votes/Share=____________Votes Votes
XDate____________, 2017, 2020Total=____________Votes Votes